Also using those kind of images don’t prove much, the moon has been shown being even closer than that in Ben 10 from that perspective.
No moon is 238,900 miles away from earth but this close.
Then it’s not 238,900 miles away. Rather simple.
Or that is just the way they have it, do you want them to show it incredibly far to where we either don’t see it on screen with the planet or barely see it on screen? I don’t see how that would constitute the Moon being closer to Earth than in real life, when it just the way they represent it.
That makes zero sense
We aren’t on that yet, but I would say yes, as he stated it was 6 times bigger, while he compared it to Ganymede
No, here you have an exoplanet and are arguing shorter than Earth-Moon orbit, it's not the same.
This is how they draw stuff, you can’t say it isn’t as far away as in real life, because of how it is drawn
It is definitely not in the background and that is how it is drawn. You can also clearly tell it isn’t in the background
I’m just displaying how they have celestial bodies drawn together, since Galvan Prime has been shown to be at least this distance, if not further. There is nothing to actually suggest that it isn’t the same distance in real life, you’re just stretching things at this point.
It is literally common sense to tell that it isn’t in the background. Like you can clearly tell it isn’t in the background. You can even see it curved, if you actually look. Especially with how the Earth looks, you can tell it isn’t in the background.
You also keep on bring up how this stuff should actually look, when obviously they don’t have everything to scale or perspective as perfectly as it can be. It is pretty unreasonable to try and downplay a verse like that, especially when the logic behind it is faulty.
You’re showing it from AF, not a great way to prove your point. The Moon I showed was from OV, which is when we see Galvan B. Like I said you’re really stretching it.
The only one doing the circular reasoning is you, showing the same things that have already been debunked like Galvan B looking how the Moon does here, all I did was show that the showing of the Moon has always been like that consistently similar to Galvan B, it would only be a good comparison of showing the distances if it was the same series, if you're going to be comparing the distances the way you did. Also of course the distance has been shown differently between series have you not watched the show, that is what happens when a new crew comes. Stop bringing irrelevant things in this that are in no way similar to what we are discussing, if you don't have any actual evidence of the distance not being at least the same as the Moon is from the Earth is, just concede. I've also never said that it is the artist mistake and no one said the animators made an oopsie, they just have the celestial bodies drawn like that, get over it, no need to be childish and get pressed over this. Also how is this an excuse, it is just common sense.
Yeah lol, not many people are giving any input.
By that logic Incursion home planet should also not be compared to Earth.
I downgraded Eatle in one of my replies (sorry Cookie).
No because there’s a 4 times multiplier between them while with Kevin only 2 times or less (because HB is a strong mid-tier). This does mean OV Heatblast can fight against AF Vilgax for a decent amount of time, which is supported by his other scaling.
Actually his Ray of Rouleau which can blow apart AF DH’s crystals stomped Ultimos, heck you could argue his ray would stomp AF DH since we scale his crystals’ dura to his own dura (not that that makes a lot of sense). Then Vilgax punched Ultimos into the ground to finish him, which is where the at least comes from. I’m not saying Armored Kevin = AF Vilgax, I’m saying he downscales but can still hurt him.
We have a lot to go through, doing everything individually would literally take months.
I mean, this only works if we cherrypick examples of the Moon/Earth being drawn unrealistically close from space (which I think there's 1 or 2 from Omniverse), however we're kind of forgetting the optics of the planet/moon viewed from each other's surface. When viewed from the Moon, Earth is far, far more distant than Galvan is viewed from Galvan B, and the same is roughly consistent vice versa. While you can give me a few examples of bad optics for the Earth/Moon at best, every single example of Galvan Prime and Galvan B portrayed visually in the show have them far closer.
There have been many bad optics of the Moon more consistently throughout all the series, including Omniverse (which is when we see Galvan B for the first time), and if you’re going to be comparing the optics the way you are, you have to take it from the same series. Like the Moon viewed from Earth here or the Moon viewed in space here, Galvan B has been drawn further than that if not at least the same as it. I don’t see how anything shown debunks Duncan’s tweet about the distance. We’ve also never seen the Earth viewed from the Moon in Omniverse and both of your images that you showed are the same one.
It wasn’t really a special interaction, this was just the only time we seen Gravattack increase his gravity that much, and it was when he captured a Time Beast and tried to slow it down with his gravity, which could only be accomplished by becoming a black hole/creating one. Nothing really says he would constantly need a Time Beast to do it again. As he could still increase his gravity to that level.
I was targetting every time Galvan Prime and/or B appeared in the continuity:
It was, Rook specifically says this happened because of the interaction of Gravattack’s gravity powers and the Time Beast’s time powers.
