- 3,294
- 1,289
That was the point of contention.Planck69 said:That sounds ridiculous honestly. Several verses on the wiki would get resistance to soul-hax if just not mentioning souls is enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was the point of contention.Planck69 said:That sounds ridiculous honestly. Several verses on the wiki would get resistance to soul-hax if just not mentioning souls is enough.
I mean tbh, I'm in the camp of people who belive that if souls are never mentioned in-verse, then we shouldn't assume they exist.Planck69 said:That sounds ridiculous honestly. Several verses on the wiki would get resistance to soul-hax if just not mentioning souls is enough. Hell, I don't even know why we assume this for the real world and not for verses established in a representation of it, not as though they arbitrarily gain souls considering what they're based on.
Yeah, this would make sense if not by the fact that an entire verse would have immunity to soul hax just because souls aren't mentioned.YungManzi said:I mean tbh, I'm in the camp of people who belive that if souls are never mentioned in-verse, then we shouldn't assume they exist.
This opinion of mine tripples when talking about non-magical verses, which I believe prototype falls under.
Virus's aren't even considered living things biologically. So there's that as well.
They are once they infect someone so yes.TheCrimsonEbonyCrawlingChaos said:It's debatable if Viruses are "living".
I've been here a while Earl. You don't have to tell me how we treat things.Firephoenixearl said:It's not an "arbitrary weakness". It's what's called "a default assumption".
No Limits Fallacies are about the limits of abilities. For instance, Saitama hasn't been shown to struggle with any of his opponents, but that doesn't make him unbeatable, it just means we assume his limit to be around the strongest opponent he's beaten. That's more of an argument from ignorance.YungManzi said:@XDragnoir
It's not a NLF. In order for it to be NLF there would need to be a commonality in play. Based on logical thought experiments.
For example: "Minds are never mentioned, so minds don't exist, threrefore this character cannot be mind controlled."
Oh really? That's awkward. I knew what you said was a joke but I saw you mention soul crush in the Recent Wiki Activity and figured somebody was complaining about it as is usually the case. I guess I was a bit too quick to post. Apologies.Planck69 said:Who brought up Bleach? Or any problem regarding it being passive? My post was mostly a joke.
I don't know if mind hax would work on Alex, it is still based in the Assasin being a blank, which doesn't mean much for a completely soulless being. I am pretty sure that he resists mind hax already and isn't vulnerable to blanks like Ahriman (since he was brought up before.) Phasing won't help too much since he will need to enter reality to cause harm to Alex and skill won't get around Alex's hax.GyroNutz said:Outside of the soul hax and power null, Culexus has passive mind fuckery, an immense amount of skill and he can phase in and out of reality.
So? Psykers have a specific weakness to blanks. I don't see how this applies to someone immune to the side effects of Blanks.Planck69 said:Ahriman can resist mind-hax from other psykers with planetary mind-hax and he got mind-****** pretty hard by a blank.