Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, you're just lying here, you explicitly made the claim it was figurative and I quoted it in a previous message. The fact you couldn't prove that is what I was initially arguing/joking about. You didn't initially make a possibly claim, you made a certain one, then retreated to this argument when I refuted it.Okay, if you aren't making that claim then I suppose we have no disagreement? My stance was simply that the evidence was insufficient. I needn't prove the alternative in order to take that stance, that's not how burden of proof works.
Irony, thy name is man. Accusing someone of the very thing you are doing is an interesting approach, to be sure.I still have a problem with your.... less than honest debate tactics that were on full display here.
Again, you're just lying here, you explicitly made the claim it was figurative and I quoted it in a previous message. The fact you couldn't prove that is what I was initially arguing/joking about. You didn't initially make a possibly claim, you made a certain one, then retreated to this argument when I refuted it.
This is the dishonesty I pointed out. See Motte and Bailey tactics.
I needn't prove it was flowery language (although it certainly seemed that way to me and others I spoke to, given Gerard's manner of speaking), the absence of evidence of it being literal is itself a sufficient reason to remove the ability
Deagon. This is a claim. I'm not sure if you're aware of that.I needn't prove it was flowery language (although it certainly seemed that way to me and others I spoke to, given Gerard's manner of speaking)
I am, but I think a misunderstanding of English grammar has led you to believe a different claim was made than what I actually said.Deagon. This is a claim. I'm not sure if you're aware of that.
this is probably because you spoke to people who aleady typically agree with you(although it certainly seemed that way to me and others I spoke to, given Gerard's manner of speaking)
Dude you can't accuse me of that and then think this is an intelligent argument.I am, but I think a misunderstanding of English grammar has led you to believe a different claim was made than what I actually said.
Try to identify the difference between these two statements:
1. That statement is figurative.
2. That statement seemed figurative to me.
No this is ridiculous.I suppose you could claim both have a burden of proof, but if you are demanding proof for statement 2, you're basically asking me to prove my internal mind state of having that impression. The second statement doesn't incur a burden of proof that it is figurative. It's really odd that you would claim that.
You really think we'll get to the Askin and Gerard fights in cour 3?We have to wait for Cour 3 to adapt Gerard scenes
F.These statements express the exact same claim.
Probably. Though those people were staff members, so thats kinda how it works.this is probably because you spoke to people who aleady typically agree with you
Concession accepted Ig.
maybe? we dont know since cour 3 and 4 are gonna have a lot of OG materialYou really think we'll get to the Askin and Gerard fights in cour 3?
Writing headcanon, lol.Concession accepted Ig.
I don't think it's typical to ask someone to prove that something seemed a certain way to them. Usually you just sort of take them on their word that they had that impression, but yeah if your whole point was "you can't prove you had that impression" beyond me just telling you, then sure I guess we agree?You make some ridiculous claim that you can't justify.
what it all boils down to.
Writing headcanon, lol.
Dude, you just don't understand how claims work. Stop debating Semantics when you don't understand how words work.There comes a point where someone takes a stance so ridiculous it warrants little further discussion. In this case, the notion that describing an impression is the same as making a positive claim and incurs the same level of proof is egregious enough that I don't see how any progress could be made, you could only reach that conclusion if you were choosing to be unreasonable.
Uh yes tf? You claim you believe something and I ask why you believe it.I don't think it's typical to ask someone to prove that something seemed a certain way to them. Usually you just sort of take them on their word that they had that impression, but yeah if your whole point was "you can't prove you had that impression" beyond me just telling you, then sure I guess we agree?
Possibly.You really think we'll get to the Askin and Gerard fights in cour 3?
Why would Japanese grammar align 100% with English grammar?I am, but I think a misunderstanding of English grammar has led you to believe a different claim was made than what I actually said.
Let me join you
Right, hence the issue. If you are not able to understand the difference between "is" and "seems" then there's not much else we can do here. It's an incredible simple thing that could only be rejected by someone choosing to be unreasonable. Amplified further by the really silly claim about "conceding." Sorry, I'd prefer not to serve as your English teacher. The fact that your stance has boiled down to "claiming to have an impression of a thing is the same as claiming that your impression is correct" is sufficient for me.Both statements express the claim it's figurative, and that claim needs to be defended. You're making a positive claim in both, and you fail to show a distinction between the statements.
Sure, and I'm happy to explain why I got that impression (which I did above), but an impression is not a positive claim, it's a sensory experience. Perhaps this is just a vocabulary issue?The fact you have an impression isn't in dispute, i'm asking you why you hold that impression, which is perfectly reasonable to ask.
My point about grammar isn't about the scans from Bleach, it is about Arcker's misunderstanding of my words which were written in English.Why would Japanese grammar align 100% with English grammar?
"We love casting spells"
What do you think having an impression something is true means?Right, hence the issue. If you are not able to understand the difference between "is" and "seems" then there's not much else we can do here. It's an incredible simple thing that could only be rejected by someone choosing to be unreasonable. Amplified further by the really silly claim about "conceding." Sorry, I'd prefer not to serve as your English teacher.
I'm asking you to justify why you hold the impression. I can ask you to justify your beliefs.The fact that your stance has boiled down to "claiming to have an impression of a thing is the same as claiming that your impression is correct" is sufficient for me
Thank you for conceding I am correct.Sure, and I'm happy to explain why I got that impression (which I did above), but an impression is not a positive claim, it's a sensory experience. Perhaps this is just a vocabulary issue?
Never made a claim against this.impression - an effect produced in the mind by a stimulus; sensation: he gave the impression of wanting to help
seem - give the impression or sensation of being something or having a particular quality: he seemed upset.
Having an impression is a sensory experience, it's how something appears to be in your mind, but not everything is as it seems and the term implies a high level of subjectivity and uncertainty. Again, this is very simple English. It's really odd to need to explain this.
No need to ask, I provided the definition:What do you think having an impression something is true means?
It means that the sky appears to be green to you. It is not a claim that the sky is green, it is a claim of how it looks. For instance, if one had some sort of ocular disorder which cause the sky to look green to them, then it would be true that the sky seems green to them. It would not be true that the sky is green. An statement about one's impression is not a statement about objective reality, it is about one's sensory experience.What does it mean to say that "It seems to be the case the sky is green?" Is that a claim that cannot be asked to be justified? You can't ask someone to justify their beliefs if it's an impression?
Hopefully that is helpful to improving your understanding. Most of the rest of your comment oscillates between an overt temper tantrum and you claiming certain things were concessions to feel better, so I don't think they deserve a substantive response from me.
I'm holding English class, ig.
True we don't want to have anything that will cause issues as MAPPAHonestly if they can find a way to utilize AI such that it lightens the load on the animators, that could potentially be huge for the work environment of animators.
Bro, what, are you kidding? Did you really ask that question?So when are we getting Tier 0 Bleach ?