- 11,387
- 19,984
He just said he didn't insult your english skills, but i have the scans
Agree with the upgrade Fra.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He just said he didn't insult your english skills, but i have the scans
noPossibly.
He just said he didn't insult your english skills, but i have the scans
The best we can say is "hyperbole", we've been through these things so many times that I've lost count.It's just so laughably [Redacted for attacking the credibility of Deagonx] that he tries to say he didn't make multiple insults to me such as calling my arguments Temper tantrums and such.
You can critique my conduct here sure, but Deagon's attempts to minimize any culpability he has for the shitstorm that happened here is just intellectually [Redacted for attacking the credibility of Deagonx].
Because some people lack reading comprehension to be frank. Non staff are allowed to comment there so long as it has relevant information, which mine does but whatever.@LordGinSama i see you are getting a Delete Crush GG in RVT, comments were restored but deleted again.
Not gonna fuss about it since people can see that's just an abuse of power on a certain thread mod's end.
As Deagonx said,
"Non staff are allowed to comment here for the purposes of making a report, responding to one, or providing clarifying information or context. It isn't allowed for non staff to interject simply to offer their opinion on an ongoing RVR matter."
I will leave these scans here for context.
All you did was post screenshots of the discussion I linked in the original report. So, yes.Bruh they erased my post providing context
Are mods having beefImagine deleting Duedate's comment as well.
"Your post was in the thread Rule Violation Reports was deleted: Reason: You disagreed with me "Imagine deleting Duedate's comment as well.
This is such an abuse of power. Posting scans relevant to a discussion is adding context.All you did was post screenshots of the discussion I linked in the original report. So, yes.
I posted screenshots of things you omitted when you said thisAll you did was post screenshots of the discussion I linked in the original report. So, yes.
RespectfullyI'll also clarify for others, I didn't say this. The discussion revolved around explaining the difference between two words, and I said "I don't want to be your English teacher" with regard to continually explaining what the word meant. Not "you don't know English."
Your opinion on the report isn't relevant information.Non staff are allowed to comment there so long as it has relevant information, which mine does but whatever.
It's redundant to what was already posted in the thread.Posting scans relevant to a discussion is adding context.
That's completely relevant information.Your opinion on the report isn't relevant information.
Dude, be careful; you are going to get reported next.That's completely relevant information.
It's literal immaturity at it's finest Deagonx. If you have a consistent problem with a user then the best and easiest solution is to avoid them. Simple as that, but I suppose that'd be asking too much from you.
No it isn't, you aren't a member of staff.That's completely relevant information.
Arcker is free to refrain from responding to me if he feels inclined. If he does choose to engage with me he simply has to ensure he does so whilst abiding with the rules, and then there's no issue.If you have a consistent problem with a user then the best and easiest solution is to avoid them.
Nothing I said was reportable.Dude, be careful; you are going to get reported next.
Cool and you aren't an Administrator yet you have a habit of enforcing things as if you are. Once the comment was restored by a staff member, you deleted them again. So I suppose the only staff member that decides if a comment is relevant or irrelevant is you now? Is that the implication?No it isn't, you aren't a member of staff.
It's not just him, that's the issue. It's the both of you. Just saying it's annoying to see a CRT and instead of arguments it's just you and him beefing.Arcker is free to refrain from responding to me if he feels inclined. If he does choose to engage with me he simply has to ensure he does so whilst abiding with the rules, and then there's no issue.
No. I asked three admins privately who affirmed by decision. Crab, Agnaa, and Mav.Cool and you aren't an Administrator yet you have a habit of enforcing things as if you are. Once the comment was restored by a staff member, you deleted them again. So I suppose the only staff member that decides if a comment is relevant or irrelevant is you now? Is that the implication?
No. I asked three admins privately who affirmed by decision. Crab, Agnaa, and Mav.
That would have to go through HR.Someone remind me that Garrixian's suggestion was a warning to both parties, why only arcker has the warning added?
For your review;
When is Ichigo going to become the Hokage? So tired of waitingCan yall hop off the general thread if yall wanna debate about RVR stuff do it on a message wall ffs
I was about to say the same thing but a lot less nice, the matter has been concluded in the RVR, it doesn’t need to be continued here. Take it to your walls if you really want to keep debating, but stop clogging this thread with it.Can yall hop off the general thread if yall wanna debate about RVR stuff do it on a message wall ffs
Someone remind me that Garrixian's suggestion was a warning to both parties, why only arcker has the warning added?
When he finds the One PieceWhen is Ichigo going to become the Hokage? So tired of waiting
And becomes the Wizard King frWhen he finds the One Piece
Let's get back to relevant stuff: Aizen is portrayed as Jesus, and Yhwach is portrayed as the antichrist.Can yall hop off the general thread if yall wanna debate about RVR stuff do it on a message wall ffs
What is HR?Because staff member = go talk to HR
The guys you talk to when you want to report a staff member.What is HR?