- 15,772
- 5,684
Keep in mind, BASE Asta was able to reflect attacks that he reflected himself, amping their power.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First, if Asta uses Black Divider, he one-shots but doesn't stomp since both can use their High 6-C weapons, Asta just uses it before her.AnonymousBlank said:7 votes that happened before anything was brought up for the other character don't mean anything though.
People can't even agree on what he uses as one person says he switches to Divider if he needs it while another says he starts with it from the get go which is an AP stomp. If he doesn't, he won't be able to draw Divider when they are in cqc as Saber massively outskills (fights Archer Cu, Lancelot, Herc etc), would have x4 AP after ditching her armor the first time he negs it (if she doesn't cop on when he negs IA like Diarmuid did) and x6 speed which definitely counters his IA and AD. If does, she still maintains her speed and skill advantage so getting hit is gonna be grazes at best which get regened as his regen neg mechanics is something she already regened from without issue.
This will be hard. This match just reminded me how long Nasuverse matches are.Milly Rocking Bandit said:Yup. We can do more BC vs Fate matches.
I don't think its work that way, its still counted if they still not see the counter argument is enough to debunk their reasoning, i honestly don't see how Saber win this at best she can just Stall Asta until she ran out of Mana while Asta pretty sure have stamina advantage, AP advantage, speed AMP (speed AMP is not equalized unless its makes him blitz His opponent) and Anti-Magic, Magic Resistance in fate maybe can have power null attribute but its only work on Magic while Asta doesnt even have Magic.Schnee One said:Previous votes don't count if they are given acounter argument and zero response
But the reasoning was provided by voters who kept responding afterwards
So no, the reasoning is valid until they have no counter argument