- 15,332
- 7,563
Equally for the sixth time, nobody here is arguing for a strict rule.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We already have a standard.Kaltias said:No one is arguing for a rule Matt.
We are arguing for a standard
You're arguing for a standard that affects the implementation of rules, and the results are virtually indistinguishable.Kepekley23 said:Equally for the sixth time, nobody here is arguing for a strict rule.
Yet we're not arguing large differences in AP, we're arguing for an exact line where it turns into a one-shot, something you would need evidence that you lack to prove and would need more substance than a vacuous opinion.Kepekley23 said:> Again, using the absolute extremes to make your point.
It's effectively the same argument. You recognize it's, in no kind words, BS that a Tier 6 can't one shot a Tier 8, but it's effectively the same as saying a 50-ton 8-B shouldn't be able to one-shot a 5-ton High 8-C.
First rule of the Versus Threads Rules is not creating stomp matches, whose definition this would effect. It doesn't take large leaps in logic to see the consequences of this.ProfessorLord said:Uhh Dargoo?
Breaking the rules can get you warnings or banned.
Not following the guidelines for battles can get it moved to the fund and game board. It slightly crosses with the rules in the sense that not posting stomps is a guideline, but other than that they are very different.
That's pretty much what I was saying tbh.Dragonmasterxyz said:Overall, there is no need for a rule. A standard is an option that is useful. But the standard is not the rule and should be flexible to allow exceptions to it.
Not with that attitude you can't. You quitter. ovoKaltias said:But you can't do step 2 without step 1
ThisDMUA said:It's a general idea for the range, not an exact science.
This is what I call "paying too much attention to detail." This is fiction not irl, Problems occur when you try to go 100% off feats and stuff. Personally I dislike the whole "this character is 30 megatons". Like this character is exactly this many tons. It doesn't look right relying on a calculation and saying something like "this character is exactly this strong" debating this with someone outside the wiki they are gunna look at you like you crazy. I learned my lesson from that.Kaltias said:If you take an attack thousands of times above your dura without being turned into a blood stain it's PIS.
When did I make a stomp match?Kepekley23 said:@Assalt
Not really, other than Sans. Reporting for stomp matches was always a thing, but it was never ban worthy anyway.
This is beautifulRavenSupreme said:AP is an important factor but simply point our finger at a mere difference factor of X to completely negate the entire debate is not always a solution. It may be when virtually no participant of the thread has any form of hax or other means to affect the opponent in any way and we are pitting two characters against each other who have no other ability outside their AP.
In addition a gap of 2-5 times for the most part still is within the same tier, meaning both participants are in the general ballpark.
And when people are in the general ballpark we then further look at how they get their scaling. Was it an utmost casual attack when they performed the feat? Was it a special technique? Was it a general punch? A last resort? If they withstood a certain AP value, have they withstood so without any form of damage? Have they merely survived? Were they bruised? Heavily injured?
Simply saying: Oh this guy is 40 X and the other is 200X all arguments are redundant is not applicable for the most part due to these reasons. Someone who can at max withstand 200X is not automatically completely immune to any attack below that threshold. Someone who can dish out 200X with specific moves does not automatically get that scaling for each and every of his bread and butter moves.
I havent gone into detail with hax, which completely shake up the entire thing even further, once, because they often ignore general durability rules and second because in a match without knowledge and IC rules even someone who gets the 200X can quickly fall to a 40X character who uses hax the other has no defense about. One might as well turn the tide and say: character with 40X has a specific hax move which the other, who has 200X, cant defend against - lets call it a stomp.
VSbattles are not a numbers comparison. They are debates where we ponder each individuals characteristic, physical/magical prowess (usually by referring to calcs), special abilities and synergies against each other and in the end decide on a more likely winner.
Doing anything else completely negates the reason for the existance of the vsbattles subsection.