- 9,982
- 10,819
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Anos is Back, and so are Maou Gakuin Downgrades
- Thread starter Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
- Start date
- Status
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
- Thread starter
- #242
That's only for accepting threads, not rejecting them. The discussion rules also note you shouldn't make an upgrade for a previously rejected topic so :v
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
Dude... It's just like the concepts inside people in GoW are Type 1 just because they're governing them... No that's definitely Type 3. If you have a problem, talk to DT or tag a staff. Controlling the reality of a person/structure is not the same as Controlling an entire plane of reality
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
This is for Tier 1. 2 staff is sufficient for such hax revisions.
Godsatoshi23
He/Him- 884
- 921
No, iirc that thread didn't got concluded because supporters decided to close it .
Last edited:
- 18,393
- 14,323
It needs ya, I still don't know where she got the idea that it was rejected till now.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
- Thread starter
- #247
- 5,483
- 3,550
And the thread is about rejecting.
So to get the rejection to be accepted you need 3 votes? Or am I wrong?
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 16,839
- 12,523
It wasn't rejected either. It was closed. Fuji should read the thread properly
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
At least 3 for Tier 1, but 2 staff is usually sufficient for hax revisions like this.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
- Thread starter
- #252
You are wrong, yes. Because the standards about staff input only apply to accepting threads, rather than rejecting them. We have similar standards for the grace period (where a thread can be closed less than 48 hours after posting if it's overwhelmingly rejected).
That thread went on for several days and was never accepted, and had more disagreements than agreements. This isn't complicated.
Glass and Planck disagreed, Dereck agreed. That is 2 to 1. It was rejected.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 16,839
- 12,523
This thread has 1 agree and no Disagree from staff which was created after the thread you linked yeah crazy how you tried to brush it off.
Edit: My bad Glass Disagreed with no reason so couldn't see his disagreement.
Last edited:
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
But there's nothing to discuss about it. 2 staff were refusing, that's basically enough.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
The_Pink_God
She/Her- 2,641
- 731
CAN WE ******* FOCUS ON THIS CRT PLEASE!?
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
- Thread starter
- #257
I'd rather we get the obvious rule violation out of the way first, seeing as MG supporters are lying about staff votes and applying upgrades that were entirely rejected.
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,762
- 15,171
Then why don't you go back to the RVR thread and sort that out?
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 16,839
- 12,523
I would rather consider the opinion of the guy(staff) who explains better and disagrees instead of saying I disagree because I am a staff.
Darth literally explained why it is type 1 concepts and glass was literally shot down and he himself started still arguing with Tatsumi because he couldn't actually give a refute properly great.
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,762
- 15,171
Are y'all really saying staff votes don't matter because you don't want them to matter 
Godsatoshi23
He/Him- 884
- 921
Are you talking about your source downgrade thread?
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 16,839
- 12,523
I am talking about staff only no one else. Darth is a staff who agreed with CM type 1 source with proper explanation and glass Disagree without a reasonAre y'all really saying staff votes don't matter because you don't want them to matter
- 9,982
- 10,819
Based isn't it?Are y'all really saying staff votes don't matter because you don't want them to matter
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
Elde, the problem was that not only Glass, Planck also disagreed. Which makes downgrade sense to me, especially after the statements made by DT.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 16,839
- 12,523
Plank wasn't even participated in second thread. It was glass and Darth only and Glass didn't give a reason where Darth did.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/upgra...type-1-concept-again-pt-2.151092/post-5583677
Godsatoshi23
He/Him- 884
- 921
You really have to read DT statements clearly about what he said regarding CM
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
- Thread starter
- #268
Which is still a disagreement, so RIP.
That, and the two type 1 upgrades which were never accepted.
Godsatoshi23
He/Him- 884
- 921
About your thread it was based on that the source doesn't gover all of reality but seeing that was not necessary in our standards, doesn't it make it invalid ? Or we can still consider something which is not even in our standards requirements?
As I saw leaving Dark every one agreed because it doesn't govern all of reality and so what tatsumi used right now doesn't got rejected at all (atleast logically) also dark said it can be type 2 . if source can govern all the things within its influence (which it does) and he explained clearly.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
- Thread starter
- #270
Which... doesn't change the fact that all of that logic was attempted, and explicitly rejected multiple times.
- 5,483
- 3,550
Brooo just indirectly cause rvr clutter
Also ya'll keep arguing about voted this voted that. Instead of addressing the whole crux. Of the argument. Anything accepted can be changed just because it got changed once doesn't mean it is now infallible and should be taken as immutable truth. Jfc instead of arguing back and forth and baiting each other to admit things that at best will only give you a slap on the wrist you guys should just call out more staff than overly relying on the same staff from the last crt. Clearly there is an impasse and as such more votes to properly weigh in is required.
Rushing this whole 3 votes this 3 votes that is only inciting further threads like this to be made.
Finalize your argument and compile it in one post and do not argue back just answer what is the contention once and if they replied with the same argument leave it as that.
Then call staff to evaluate and if they ask for more info then provide
Godsatoshi23
He/Him- 884
- 921
So your logic is greater than what our wiki standards consider?
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
- Thread starter
- #273
It's not my logic though, it's the logic of the staff members. You know, the ones who decide what gets accepted.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
No, in order to be Type 2/1, it must include or affect the entire plane of reality. It is only Type 3 if it only affects the reality of the structure or person to which it is attached.
Godsatoshi23
He/Him- 884
- 921
Well, I know but now you know that the logic was wrong and instead of reporting someone, don't you think it should be more wise to correct it or don't use it at all because the reason are completely different now.
Godsatoshi23
He/Him- 884
- 921
No, DT said individual concept can also be type 1/2.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
It could be. But for this, it must be able to affect the all entire plane of reality. It is not Type 1/2 if it only affects the reality of the person it is attached to.
- 9,982
- 10,819
Type 1 concepts are specifically independent of reality, so dunno why it matters, besides, reality can be anything. It doesn't have any specific definition.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
- Thread starter
- #279
If the logic was wrong then why did staff overwhelmingly agree with it?
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Status
