Fallen_Angelicx
He/Him- 3,051
- 577
Writing part 2 rn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The second key says "same as before," implying he has the same weaknesses as his first keyEntitled this;
Bolded point is the weakness they're referring to. Quotations around the | separate the keys which is pretty common across the wiki especially for outdated pages or pages with old edits.... Madara Uchiha's page out of the many has this for example. This means that it ain't strange to have separations and I'm sure Shion has 1000+ wiki edits to know this.
It says that as a way to say they're fighting in the same body. Shinpei has his weakness and Ryuunosuke has his. It's split into keys and they're different people but they're under the same body. It was removed recently anyway upon me speaking with mods about it. It isn't supposed to incline with them both having the same weaknessThe second key says "same as before," implying he has the same weaknesses as his first key
"Same as before" objectively does imply having the same weaknesses. If there are certain weaknesses that aren't the same from one key to another, that should be noted. As it stands, it's clear where the confusion on this point in particular came fromIt says that as a way to say they're fighting in the same body. Shinpei has his weakness and Ryuunosuke has his. It's split into keys and they're different people but they're under the same body. It was removed recently anyway upon me speaking with mods about it. It isn't supposed to incline with them both having the same weakness
This point makes sense and I understand their perspective now, despite it being misinformation. It didn't change anything in the course of the discussion however, since it's been argued that Ryuunosuke could just knock Sans out;"Same as before" objectively does imply having the same weaknesses. If there are certain weaknesses that aren't the same from one key to another, that should be noted. As it stands, it's clear where the confusion on this point in particular came from
And even tho my point here is valid, if u wanna bring up the "its profile thoo" bs then it still doesn't stop ryuunosuke from knocking sans unconscious which he'd easily be able to do.
These points ofc were ignored by Shion and the others. I'm getting the match removed from the profiles in Versus Match Removal Thread as it's filled with a lot of misconceptions and is just a stomp. @Catbowtie goes indepth on that in his post in the San's vs Ryuunosuke thread.Why won't he kill him? What's stopping him from knocking him out too? All this happens before Sans even thinks of speaking because ryuunosuks is pulling his amplification even if it harms him
Thx for stopping by. Appreciate it CloverYeah, I admittedly don't have much of a stake in the rest, I just wanted to clear up that bit of info
I briefly just added the thread since I got the proper votes needed for one specific Hax. But I could ask Glassman for his input again to completely shut down that argument once and for all. Sorry for the Multi Posting tho, I'll do otherwise in the future.This is a log of text to look at, but I would have to strongly suggest avoid multi-posting on the RVR and to give staff time to evaluate. But since Glassman and Spaceman were in the content revision, they could comment on what their stance was one what they accepted.
What do you mean, it's a sock? I've been in contact with Fuji on discord, and she is equally confused as to why some random account decided to dm her and ask to continue revisions.Off topic to above, but this user was reportedly a sock of Mad Dog of Fujiwura; all the more reason to keep her permabanned. And be on the lookout she may attempt more socks in the future.
Hmmm, I will assume someone decided to report that account in private as noted in DDM’s wording on the matter.What do you mean, it's a sock? I've been in contact with Fuji on discord, and she is equally confused as to why some random account decided to dm her and ask to continue revisions.
Did you even do an IP check? You guys kind of just banned a random user who was just curious about revisions.
What other proof is there besides this person commenting on Fuji's page, I'd like to see it before make such bold claims.
reportedly
I won't disagree that it is really REALLY sus for this account to comment on Fuji's page first thing, but I think it's important to understand VSBW's reach within the at wide powerscaling community. Many people have talked about the GoW revisions and even planned Touhou ones, and I'm sure talks have reached far outside our bubble (hell I've seen Touhou youtubers who don't even powerscale make videos on it and mention Fuji because of her involvement).Hmmm, I will assume someone decided to report that account in private as noted in DDM’s wording on the matter.
That part should been addressed as he was probably informed by someone else regarding that account.
Regardless, I do think it was premature to ban a new user permanently, but outside of that, it is odd a new user does seem to have some knowledge of the Wiki and Forum, but likely out of observations.
Anyway, that is all I have to say regarding this part.
Our forum directly registered the @Liviticus account as being a sockpuppet of Fujiwara.What do you mean, it's a sock? I've been in contact with Fuji on discord, and she is equally confused as to why some random account decided to dm her and ask to continue revisions.
Did you even do an IP check? You guys kind of just banned a random user who was just curious about revisions.
What other proof is there besides this person commenting on Fuji's page, I'd like to see it before make such bold claims.
The forum? I don't quite get what that means, is it like an IP check or just something else.Our forum directly registered the @Liviticus account as being a sockpuppet of Fujiwara.
Well, I believe I've given enough evidence to at least suggest that this isn't a sock. Fuji maintains her innocence in having no clue who this is, but she's stated that even when she was not banned, she used a VPN (something I know that some sock detectors on other forum sites and places can give false positives on).XenForo's automatically registers if somebody is a sockpuppet account in multiple ways.
What are you five years old? People say mean shit on the internet. Grow a pair.@DarkDragonMedeus are there reprocusions For calling someone schizophrenic?
If that's the case then the ban is warranted, yeah.Our forum directly registered the @Liviticus account as being a sockpuppet of Fujiwara.
If Fuji is using a VPN is probably what cause the issue as chances are, they could been using the same IP addresses by coincidence or something.stated that even when she was not banned, she used a VPN (
No, it isn't speculative. The new account apparently interacted with Fujiwara's account, and our forum strongly registered it as being a sockpuppet. It is an extremely clear case, so please stop interfering here.Well, I believe I've given enough evidence to at least suggest that this isn't a sock. Fuji maintains her innocence in having no clue who this is, but she's stated that even when she was not banned, she used a VPN (something I know that some sock detectors on other forum sites and places can give false positives on).
I'd appreciate it if this could be further looked into, for both users sakes, as this all seems speculative at best.
Calling somebody schizophrenic is rude, but usually not bannable, but that is not a valid reason for yourself to be even more rude.What are you five years old? People say mean shit on the internet. Grow a pair.
Sorry about thatCalling somebody schizophrenic is rude, but usually not bannable, but that is not a valid reason for yourself to be even more rude.
A fair point, but I have considered the other possibility that the new User does have a native IP address as they might not necessarily used a VPN as it does depend on the country they live in and all that.The fact that the first thing the user did was message Fuji already makes it very suspicious, especially given the subject, if they are using the same VPN, then that kinda is just fumbling the bag.
Our system is literally programmed to detect if any pending accounts have the same Email Address and or IP Address as other users on forum; and better yet if they happened to be banned users. In this case, it was confirmed. Also, them interacting with themselves on Message Walls doesn't confirm them being different people; ZaStando has done that plenty of times, as has Sera Ex and VenomElite. In fact, plenty of staff members do something similar offsite and screenshot themselves using multiple Discord accounts and talk to themselves just to prove people can just make use of multiple accounts to pretend to be multiple people.Well, I believe I've given enough evidence to at least suggest that this isn't a sock. Fuji maintains her innocence in having no clue who this is, but she's stated that even when she was not banned, she used a VPN (something I know that some sock detectors on other forum sites and places can give false positives on).
I'd appreciate it if this could be further looked into, for both users sakes, as this all seems speculative at best.
Well, personally I do not think it seems harmful if other members are allowed to post Fujiwara's most important remaining God of War revisions, if they improve the reliability of the information in our wiki.However, I was alerted off-site in the midst of this situation to the fact that Fujiwara used this to get someone to proxy for her, which is an obvious misuse of this. So I've adjusted the block setting.