So in what category is it superior? Also max power isn't the kaioken. The fact kaioken could boost stats was something new at that point. Max power was just roshi using his full ki and his body accomodating it. Also there is this image.
It's superior in AP and DC, to the
REGULAR KAMEHAMEHA, not the moon booming one
And this image states what exactly full power is which as we said is him using his whole ki.
What does this do for the point at all
The point is that that isn't his regular power level at all. That can't be his power level for his regular scrawny form
I find it perfect that you mention Frieza here because well... Frieza has a form that functions exactly the same, literally just being his body accommodating to 100% of his power
Yeah, and it
RAISES HIS POWER LEVEL
Frieza has 3 main power levels stated, his most suppressed (530,000), his 2nd most suppressed (1,000,000), his full power (120,000,000).
What he's trying to say is that the Frieza who is in his full power would technically be the 530,000 power level one
CloverDragon03 is making way more sense here, and I'm genuinely baffled by the use of AOE fallacy as an argument for the Tri-Beam scaling below the Full Power Kamehameha.
To be fair.
The Tribeam is the prime example of AOE=/=AP. It's a localized **** you beam that effects, almost exclusively, what is in the POV of Tien's hand gesture, whether that be here, against Cell, or in Super.
Not saying I agree or disagree, but bringing up the attack's AOE ain't it.
WHAT THE ****
Did none of you not read the damn argument at all?
They say that the tri beam has more DC and AP than the kamehameha
The DC of the Tri-Beam was enough to destroy an arena
The DC of the average Kamehameha barely breaks through walls and makes tiny explosions
The DC of the
strongest kamehameha is enough to boom the moon
Him saying the AP and the DC of the Tri-Beam is superior to the Kamehameha is referencing the average Kamehameha and not the full power one
The DC of the technique is
supporting the fact that him saying "the AP and the DC of the Tri-Beam > the Kamehameha" does not mean "the AP and the DC of the Tri-Beam > the
STRONGEST kamehameha", but "the AP and the DC of the Tri-Beam > the average Kamehamehas we've seen throughout the series"
None of you guys are reading the ******* argument and it's actually really annoying
What the hell is so hard to understand about "him saying the AP and DC of this technique is superior to the Kamehameha, but showing to be superior to the average but inferior to the strongest one, means it's stronger than the average one and weaker than the strongest"