Blast needed help to divert the blast by manipulating the vectors. I don't care about any Inverse Square Law calc bullshit I care about what is clearly visible, he didn't tank the blast he reacted and diverted it with his friends.
I don't care about your calc which begins with the uncertain assumption that he actually tanked a portion of the damage. I care about the feats. And Garou's best feats when he fought Blast was the GRB.
No he wasn't. The first page which you linked only shows Blast opening the portal before they hit each other SPECIFICALLY to divert the blast.
What is blud waffling about
What? He's literally right next to them, and the panel shows him being sent flying back. He was inside of the circle/portal/gate thing, but ends up outside of it.
I honestly think the high-end is the most accurate out of all of these lol. The only other one that makes sense is the low end but obviously that's incredibly downplayed. The mid end could work, but I doubt people will accept Garou's reaction speed being that without claiming it's calc stacking somehow
Yeah the blast was contained by his barrier / gate thing. It doesn't matter that he was close because he stopped it from expanding.
Yeah thinking about it, High End or Low End seems the most likely. Mid End might be dismissed as calc stacking.
I don't understand what you mean by this? Why does this mean he doesn't scale to it.
I am not going to add this to the CRT as it seems way more debatable than everything else on there and I personally want this to be a simple and quick upgrade to get the profiles back in shape.
When were they called light structures for Saitama and Garou during this fight?
It doesn't matter that he's pushed back because he wasn't hit by anything! The explosion is contained there, he's just being pushed away by the knockback of trying to contain it, which is failing until he receives help.
5-A, likely High 4-C it is then. Because I don't care all that much.
Isn't calc stacking only work if you use other calc?
This fine.
What's wrong with the shockwave end. Seems just as legit to me.
Because we know that the timeframe is less than Garou and PS' timer due to it being stated to be faster.
Yes, they're visually identical. So why can't the timeframe be less here as well?
I mean, both Bug-Eaten and Kira ignore durability
I mean, Saitama literally flicks the ******* air in any direction, doesn't even matter, and they die instantly. Stupidest matches on the entire profile.
The ratt loss is funny actually, also it had nothing to do with Saitama’s AP due to it being haxed so it would just be the same
If Saitama hits the air in their direction, they die. Also, the Rat literally has to pierce skin to induce that biological effect. It's incredibly dumb.
Doesn't Saitama tend to just let his opponent do whatever in a fight and only attack when the opponent becomes a danger or when he becomes annoyed?
I think the argument was along the lines of it being selective intangibility or contact based instead of needing to actually damage or something
This is such a weird assumption people make regarding Saitama. Against monsters, he usually attacks. And under SBA there is no reason for him to let himself get damaged.
Based on SBA he would know who is opponent is and would be willing to kill it. Also, the part about it being contact based is bullshit.
Saitama hardly ever kills monsters before they hit him tho
He does it most of the time though. He only lets the monster hit him first if the monster hypes himself up as a strong fighter or specifically asks for a fight.
