• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Is the Milky Way the wiki's standard for galaxy level?
  • Solar System level: The star system known as the Solar System.
  • Multi-Solar System level:Instead of doubling the value of Solar System level, the distance between two such systems needs to be accounted for as well. The calculation for energy required to destroy two solar systems was done, with the following assumptions:
    • Distance between them as the minimum distance between Sun and the next closest star, the Alpha Centauri.
    • A spherical blast, strong enough to obliterate the contents of both solar systems at the same time.
    • Hence, the value obtained is the energy required to destroy two solar systems at a realistic distance.
  • Galaxy level: The Milky Waygalaxy.
    • Galaxies in fiction tend to be destroyed completely, not dissociated. Hence, it is far more logical to index a common occurrence of compete obliteration instead of an obscure one like dissociation.
    • We have a different interpretation regarding black holes. Simply put, we disagree with the premise of utilization of black holes for energy outputs, primarily because black holes rarely follow any scientific logic whatsoever. To know more, continue to read here.
  • Multi-Galaxy level:Instead of doubling the value of Galaxy level, the distance between two galaxies needs to be accounted for as well. The calculation for energy required to destroy two galaxies was done with the assumptions:
    • Distance between them as the minimum distance between Milky Way Galaxy and the next closest similar-sized galaxy, the Andromeda galaxy.
    • A spherical blast, strong enough to obliterate the contents of both galaxies at the same time.
    • Hence, the value obtained is the energy required to destroy two galaxies at a realistic distance.
Multi-Solar is technically dwarf galaxy. We don't have such a tier because its presumably just something utterly uncommon for a tier.
 
Is the Milky Way the wiki's standard for galaxy level? Cause technically it's a somewhat large galaxy, at least compared to the smaller ones. Some galaxies aren't even 10k light years. I'm surprised we don't have tiers for dwarf galaxy level and large galaxy level, on second though.
si,eso es lo que hizo otra wiki
 
Wait until the rules are spelled out. For all we know, it could disappear next chapter.

Either way, Saitama hasn't demonstrated acausality.
well, the fact that he did the zero-punch is definitely limited acausality, since he was able to exist twice for a short period of time (hence the limited)
 
well, the fact that he did the zero-punch is definitely limited acausality, since he was able to exist twice for a short period of time (hence the limited)
or it's just the mechanic of the time travel where the person time travelling exists for a few seconds before merging with the past version
 
well, the fact that he did the zero-punch is definitely limited acausality, since he was able to exist twice for a short period of time (hence the limited)
That honestly depends on the mechanics of the time travel being used. If it is normal to have a short time where a time traveler can exist twice, then that isn't really a feat for Saitama. It would only be a curious detail about his time travel.
 
the acausality is quite blatantly acknowledged, it is literally stated that he ended the fight without punching him, which is a direct result of acausality
you shouldn't downplay just because your headcanon says everybody can do it. Maybe it will change in the future but for now your scenario isn't really based on anything at all
 
the acausality is quite blatantly acknowledged, it is literally stated that he ended the fight without punching him, which is a direct result of acausality
you shouldn't downplay just because your headcanon says everybody can do it. Maybe it will change in the future but for now your scenario isn't really based on anything at all
that's make sense
 
the acausality is quite blatantly acknowledged, it is literally stated that he ended the fight without punching him, which is a direct result of acausality
you shouldn't downplay just because your headcanon says everybody can do it. Maybe it will change in the future but for now your scenario isn't really based on anything at all
Technically the Saitama from the future punched him though the Saitama from the present didn't. It's precisely because it might change in the future that I wouldn't be fine with giving Saitama an ability based on something that hasn't really been explained properly and has only been shown in the newest chapter that has only recently been revealed and translated.
 
Do we consider Saitama more skilled or a better martial artist than Garou now?
he maybe seems like he has the ability to be? Seems weird considering the thing with Suiryu was showing he didn't really get Martial Arts at all. There's also the fact he's faster iirc, so that helps him. But either way, he wouldn't use any of it. He copied one of Garou's moves just to mock him seemingly (which was also just a karate chop), and that was it. He didn't do anything else with martial arts, he just did his standard "Overwhelm with strength and speed" thing
 
Unquantifiable, but my head canon is every punch squared his power.

if so, then it would mean that his power is made to the power of 2 every time he punches.
I approximately counted more than 3 or 4 punches:
so,is 16 to power of the base state of saitama:
it will be like this:
4.3E+517 joule
with that logic, goku would be super dead,and you would have to use a calculation to calculate how much energy is needed to destroy a dimension(I think it would be 10 or 11 dimensional)
 
Unquantificable, but with the growth rate always increasing with each punch he takes.
I theorize that every time the enemy reaches his level, saitama moves away a bunch of levels.
if the enemy is 100 times stronger, saitama will be 10,000 times stronger, if the enemy is 10,000 times stronger, saitama will be 1,000,000 times stronger
practically this:
saitama:1
saitama(increase level 1):100
enemie:10000
saitama(increase level 2):1,000,000
enemie:100,000,000
saitama(increase level 3):1,000,000,000,000
saitama(increase level 4):1E+24
 
We literally have a graph of his power.
The problem is, it doesn't tell us how much it multiplies, it just shows us the growth.
It's like the energy bars in some series, they show us how it is, but they don't tell us the increase (practically something useless)unless you ask murata about that
 
I could make a calculation, more or less this.
1.5
1.5x1.5
2.25x2.25
5x5
25x25
625x625.
no matter how i interpreted this,later in databook,the are gonna stated something like(every increase is 100 times more powerful than the previos increase)so everything goes to the trash.
 
I’m kinda pissed that Saitama became even more godly. It feels redundant that suddenly Saitama is this master martial artist who can replicate techniques easily, even though there was next to no build-up on this. The series heavily implies he’s just an average joe with nothing but power to back him up. It doesn’t really make much sense that Saitama could be skilled at copying techniques when he’s got no training. Even if breaking his limiter gave him enhanced senses and resistances, I don’t see how that would translate to fighting ability. At least Garou trained with Bang for a few years to hone his technique. This just feels like a cop-out that ONE and Murata added to move the plot forward without giving it much thought.
 
Last edited:
The problem is, it doesn't tell us how much it multiplies, it just shows us the growth.
It's like the energy bars in some series, they show us how it is, but they don't tell us the increase (practically something useless)unless you ask murata about that
it literally has incriments of squares showing he got 16 times stronger since the serious punch squared
 
I’m kinda pissed that Saitama became even more godly. It feels like a cop-out that suddenly Saitama is this master martial artist who can replicate techniques easily, even though there was next to no build-up on this. The series heavily implies he’s just an average joe with nothing but power to back him up. It doesn’t really make much sense that Saitama could be skilled at copying techniques when he’s got no training. Even if his training gave him enhanced senses and resistances, I don’t see how that would translate to fighting ability. At least Garou trained with Bang for a few years to hone his technique. This just feels like a cop-out that ONE and Murata added to move the plot forward without giving it much thought.
like how many people had this problem and that I had to see it, wait, here is a list practically everyone but saitama keeps beating goku, if we use the increase he has as a real increase, it would mean that even if goku is millions of times more powerful , saitama will be billions of times more powerful than goku instantly because he will instantly overcome the enemy
 
Back
Top