- 1,092
- 199
Its still basically a multi continental nuke with city level range.The wiki doesn't go by destructive capacity, it goes by energy.
I personally don't think TTM can destroy a city with one punch, but it's our system.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its still basically a multi continental nuke with city level range.The wiki doesn't go by destructive capacity, it goes by energy.
I personally don't think TTM can destroy a city with one punch, but it's our system.
from multiple shots of earth(too lazy to find them and also if im not tripping) we can see another continent on the other side of earth which seems to be taking up a large portion. going by irl earths water to land ratio, opm earth seems to have a more balanced ratio rather than a 70/30 irl earth ratio.Anyways
I've recently binged OPM, I don't see much saying it can have a different sized planet
Even the thing is called earth. That's a slap in the face
Tanktop Master."TTM"?
Pretty much. Weaker people can crack continents, use mountains as punching bags, split cloud masses, etc. So it's just fiction.Its still basically a multi continental nuke with city level range.
You're misunderstanding.from multiple shots of earth(too lazy to find them and also if im not tripping) we can see another continent on the other side of earth which seems to be taking up a large portion. going by irl earths water to land ratio, opm earth seems to have a more balanced ratio rather than a 70/30 irl earth ratio.
ik, not saying its enough but from deduction skills opm earth=/=irl earth simply because of land and water ratios.You're misunderstanding.
That follows like.. . what 2 criteria? That isn't enough
Tank Top Master"TTM"?
I'm not even doing much for Naruto and One Piece and in the case of One Piece I'm not even on the Supporters list and I still think that you are not arguing in an even remotely serious or well-constructed manner. One-Punch Man has a lot of popularity and this thread alone is proof of that.Bye wankers, I'm going home. Keep sucking Naruto and Luffy's penis all you want, bye
Saitama can destroy uy scuti with a finger and mfs here talking about earth lmfao
"I'm too incredulous that this is the level of their feats!!!!... What, if I have any tangible evidence to suggest this rating is incorrect?... N..No, but HIGH 6-A OP, DUDE!"CSRC is now star level, per data book
EDIT: idk about Naruto but One Piece absolutely is wanked to hell. OP Earth is not any bigger than ours, so multi-continental for Big Mom or Kaido? Seriously?
I stand on thisyou'll be humbled there
Had to be Brazilian. As a Brazilian myself, stop embarrassing our people.Eu não falei sobre este momento específico, mas tudo bem.
Just like any other site, more so with discord debating servers, lol. It aint limited to vsbw.The wank excessive, lack of openness to constructive criticism and rule difference for less famous series is what makes VSBW be ridiculed on many battle forums, simply no one takes seriously
But I'm fine with it, I only enter here to see the links when comes out new chapter of OPM
have you even seen uni+ naruto and low multi scaling, just wondering.It's the kind of wank that puts Kaguya in High 4-C, that that makes the other forums laugh at this, very sad since the beginning of the wiki had a great proposal
Are you on mobile?Did the wiki stop working for everyone or just me?
thats impossible. you cannot destroy brazil. Brazil is > shadow realm, which is beyond the tiering system.If he can destroy Brazil it's already more than enough
I’m on mobile, and I haven’t experienced anything in the past hour or so I’ve been here.Are you on mobile?
Take into account each of these Islands is more or less the size of australiaIn that case, you should be addressing the people that originally started discussing Bleach etc. in this thread. As for OP I've seen no legitimate justification considering continents broken up and rearranged into millions of islands is about equivalent to the OP world when calculating traveling speeds of the Straw Hats.
Possibility. Might also just be Genos being brought back without any consequences, I think those are the two most likely outcomes. Genos actually being perma-dead is extremely unlikely.I wonder....if Genos gets revived.....will it even be the same Genos at this point.....maybe a Genos with his memory wiped clean but Saitama still accepts him?
tbf we didn't expect Genos to die eitherPossibility. Might also just be Genos being brought back without any consequences, I think those are the two most likely outcomes. Genos actually being perma-dead is extremely unlikely.
YepAre you on mobile?
Yes I've been having the exact same issue, I have to open incognito as well. Must be overload or somethingThe wiki hasn't been working for me on mobile for some reason. I figured it might be a personal issue because it does work when I go on incognito mode. Donno.
with the ratio being different and everything you can't even put a standard size on it tho. so its technically "?" in size.OPM's earth could be half covered in land masses and it wouldn't be larger than Earth. Irl Earth is 70% covered in water, so even if OPM's earth was 50/50, the size of Earth wouldn't change, just how much land there is compared to irl. There's a lot of room on a planet. So yeah, no one sane would ever argue that OPM earth is the exact same as irl Earth, the layout of landmasses is clearly different. But like I said, OPM earth's land to water ratio could be flipped and the actual size of earth wouldn't change.
yeah but ur under the assumption that irl earth=opm earth, with no real basis.I can, because again, Earth has a whopping 70% of its surface that could be filled up by new landmasses and still remain the exact same size as a planet. It wouldn't matter if OPM's Earth was covered in 99% land and 1% water, the actual size of the planet would have no reason to be different, because irl Earth could also be 99% covered in land and not change in overall size.
The basis is that it's called Earth. That's kinda all that's needed.yeah but ur under the assumption that irl earth=opm earth, with no real basis.
name fallacy behavior(forgot what the actual fallacy is called)The basis is that it's called Earth. That's kinda all that's needed.
well if we're speaking scientifically the earth would be different in volume/mass so technically it would be different from irl earth even if it was by .000001%.That doesn't apply here. It's called Earth, and Earth could fit the requirements for the different ratio of landmass to ocean shown in OPM, therefor it is assumed to be Earth sized until suitable evidence of the contrary.
yeah but saying its fallacy fallacy isn't disproving my point, it's irrelevant. no need to get so worked up if someone throws a fallacy at u.Also if you really wanted to go the "but fallacy" route, I can just turn around and say "fallacy fallacy", where an argument having a fallacy doesn't disprove its point