- 11,539
- 10,953
Did the wiki stop working for everyone or just me?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you on mobile?Did the wiki stop working for everyone or just me?
thats impossible. you cannot destroy brazil. Brazil is > shadow realm, which is beyond the tiering system.If he can destroy Brazil it's already more than enough
I’m on mobile, and I haven’t experienced anything in the past hour or so I’ve been here.Are you on mobile?
Take into account each of these Islands is more or less the size of australiaIn that case, you should be addressing the people that originally started discussing Bleach etc. in this thread. As for OP I've seen no legitimate justification considering continents broken up and rearranged into millions of islands is about equivalent to the OP world when calculating traveling speeds of the Straw Hats.
Possibility. Might also just be Genos being brought back without any consequences, I think those are the two most likely outcomes. Genos actually being perma-dead is extremely unlikely.I wonder....if Genos gets revived.....will it even be the same Genos at this point.....maybe a Genos with his memory wiped clean but Saitama still accepts him?
tbf we didn't expect Genos to die eitherPossibility. Might also just be Genos being brought back without any consequences, I think those are the two most likely outcomes. Genos actually being perma-dead is extremely unlikely.
YepAre you on mobile?
Yes I've been having the exact same issue, I have to open incognito as well. Must be overload or somethingThe wiki hasn't been working for me on mobile for some reason. I figured it might be a personal issue because it does work when I go on incognito mode. Donno.
with the ratio being different and everything you can't even put a standard size on it tho. so its technically "?" in size.OPM's earth could be half covered in land masses and it wouldn't be larger than Earth. Irl Earth is 70% covered in water, so even if OPM's earth was 50/50, the size of Earth wouldn't change, just how much land there is compared to irl. There's a lot of room on a planet. So yeah, no one sane would ever argue that OPM earth is the exact same as irl Earth, the layout of landmasses is clearly different. But like I said, OPM earth's land to water ratio could be flipped and the actual size of earth wouldn't change.
yeah but ur under the assumption that irl earth=opm earth, with no real basis.I can, because again, Earth has a whopping 70% of its surface that could be filled up by new landmasses and still remain the exact same size as a planet. It wouldn't matter if OPM's Earth was covered in 99% land and 1% water, the actual size of the planet would have no reason to be different, because irl Earth could also be 99% covered in land and not change in overall size.
The basis is that it's called Earth. That's kinda all that's needed.yeah but ur under the assumption that irl earth=opm earth, with no real basis.
name fallacy behavior(forgot what the actual fallacy is called)The basis is that it's called Earth. That's kinda all that's needed.
well if we're speaking scientifically the earth would be different in volume/mass so technically it would be different from irl earth even if it was by .000001%.That doesn't apply here. It's called Earth, and Earth could fit the requirements for the different ratio of landmass to ocean shown in OPM, therefor it is assumed to be Earth sized until suitable evidence of the contrary.
yeah but saying its fallacy fallacy isn't disproving my point, it's irrelevant. no need to get so worked up if someone throws a fallacy at u.Also if you really wanted to go the "but fallacy" route, I can just turn around and say "fallacy fallacy", where an argument having a fallacy doesn't disprove its point
It's called occam's razor. It's your burden of proof to provide evidence that the earth is any different from real life.yeah but ur under the assumption that irl earth=opm earth, with no real basis.
well i mean u said...Idk what in my post could be construed as getting worked up, just stating that the fallacy didn't really work here when it's the standards for planet size discussion, and that throwing a fallacy out doesn't always mean anything and doesn't always disprove the point
which is naming fallacy...which is what i replied to.The basis is that it's called Earth. That's kinda all that's needed.
which reinforces the fallacy.That doesn't apply here. It's called Earth
so yes. at the end of the day ur point only revolves around fallacies.I can just turn around and say "fallacy fallacy"
Specifically a different size, but yeah. The layout of OPM's Earth is clearly different, but since irl Earth could support that and be unchanged in size, that itself wouldn't be evidenceIt's called occam's razor. It's your burden of proof to provide evidence that the earth is any different from real life.
i did.It's called occam's razor. It's your burden of proof to provide evidence that the earth is any different from real life.
It's really just the standards of the whole different planet size discussion. The name fallacy just doesn't apply here. It's called Earth, and Earth has the size to support a different landmass ratio, therefor it is assumed it is the size of irl Earth until more evidence would be acquired. Even planets where the name is different are assumed to be Earth sized, it just so happens OPM's is still called Earth, so that assumption is even more reinforcedso yes. at the end of the day ur point only revolves around fallacies.
well yes if we're using standards set by vsbw any planet remains earth sized by default unless there is outstanding evidence to support a different size. but ur reasoning was it being called earth and the ratio's not mattering. which is irrelevant information.It's really just the standards of the whole different planet size discussion. The name fallacy just doesn't apply here. It's called Earth, and Earth has the size to support a different landmass ratio, therefor it is assumed it is the size of irl Earth until more evidence would be acquired. Even planets where the name is different are assumed to be Earth sized, it just so happens OPM's is still called Earth, so that assumption is even more reinforced
no psykos wont scale.in the future, if tatsumaki's get new better feats, psykorochi wont scale to that, right?
they scale to the range destroyed by the punch iirc, if you meant the speedCan Saitama and Garou scale the shock wave that threw them to Jupiter's moon?
pretty sure that wouldn't be anywhere near tier 5, let alone 4Can Saitama and Garou scale the shock wave that threw them to Jupiter's moon?
he meant speedpretty sure that wouldn't be anywhere near tier 5, let alone 4
At least FTLgarou and saitama are currently mftl+ IIRC
yes, I meant speed.they scale to the range destroyed by the punch iirc, if you meant the speed
then no, not for anything but attack speed of how fast the shockwaves from their punches travels yeahhe meant speed
no lol, are you crazy?At least FTL
If that calc gets accepted, yupgarou and saitama are currently mftl+ IIRC
nah, we scale boros from his kick toothen no, not for anything but attack speed of how fast the shockwaves from their punches travels yeah