STRONGEST One-Punch Man Discussion Thread!

[Theendzero13]

it will probrably need a CGD thread to even see if the 700 million C can be used , since that method would affect a ton of verses

 

[UeTa]

Well, it is 5-B, but barely above baseline.

Oh, nevermind y'all are talking about that.

The difference between my calculation and this one is that they're using the exact heat you need to melt each element. (Like, pt. 6 of my calc')

So you only have temperature ranging between 3414 °C, 5778 °C, 2100 °C. Etc, etc.

When the Pt.5 of my calc' use 784 million °C for the whole Surface and Atmosphere.
(something they didn't take into account)

 

[XVII]

https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/917231044019757086/969036164201840650/page_0.png
Shame that a good cover page is wasted by the contents of the chapters. The feeling the cover gives off fits Garou and the atmosphere of Garou before he emerges from the ground not the current Garou and the text just feels fake deep as if there is still nuance to what Garou wants to be.

the cover looks like garou is... you know... sluuuurp

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Definition of Scorch:


Definition of Incinerate:


Same thing, huh-

This. I think using the incineration end is a bit ehhhhhhhhhh

 

[Cryo123]

Definition of Scorch:


Definition of Incinerate:


Same thing, huh-

Synonym: "A word or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word or phrase in the same language, for example shut is a synonym of close"
They by definition mean almost the exact same thing. It's not me calling them synonyms, it's the actual dictionary.

 

[LordTracer]

They by definition mean almost the exact same thing.

Bruh, burning something to ashes is objectively not “almost the exact same” as burning a surface to change its color and texture.

 

[Cryo123]

Bruh, burning something to ashes is objectively not “almost the exact same” as burning a surface to change its color and texture.

Argue with the Oxford Dictionary then, I don't know what to tell you.

 

[LordTracer]

And why would I do that? They’re objectively not the same thing, you seem to be the only one that thinks they are.

 

[Cryo123]

And why would I do that? They’re objectively not the same thing

They don't have to be the exact same thing, the point is they're very similar. There's no reason for it to affect the calc.

you seem to be the only one that thinks they are.

Yeah me and everyone who made/uses the dictionary.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

They don't have to be the exact same thing, the point is they're very similar. There's no reason for it to affect the calc.

But they're different things. The statement explicitly states scorching, so we'll use scorching for the calc. It's that simple.

everyone

Who exactly? Mind giving examples of who thinks the same as the same as you?

 

[LordTracer]

They don't have to be the exact same thing, the point is they're very similar. There's no reason for it to affect the calc.

Being similar =/= having the same effects. When their effects are fundamentally different, there is absolutely a reason for it to affect which end is chosen.

 

[Cryo123]

Who exactly? Mind giving examples of who thinks the same as the same as you?

Bro you cut my comment to make it look like I said everyone. That doesn't even earn a rebutal.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Bro you cut my comment to make it look like I said everyone. That doesn't even earn a rebutal.

Because that's the part I wanna focus on? NO ONE I know thinks they're synonyms.

 

[Cryo123]

Because that's the part I wanna focus on?

But that inherently changes the meaning of what I'm saying, so at that point it's lying to make a point.

NO ONE I know thinks they're synonyms.

How about the 200 specialists and 120 scholars who keep the f*cking thing updated

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

How about the 200 specialists and 120 scholars who keep the f*cking thing updated

You linked me a website. Not a source. Show me where they say scorch and incinerate are the same thing.

But that inherently changes the meaning of what I'm saying, so at that point it's lying to make a point.

You stated: "Yeah me and everyone who made/uses the dictionary." I focused on the "everyone" part because that's where I wanted to focus on. Where am I lying?

 

[Kachon123]

The statement explicitly states scorching, so we'll use scorching for the calc. It's that simple.

The new translation says scorch or incinerate, which is why there are ends for both.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

The new translation says scorch or incinerate, which is why there are ends for both.

Can I see it? The blog only shows the scan but not the translation. And I only remember it being translated to Scorching by Qawsedf

 

[UeTa]

You linked me a website. Not a source. Show me where they say scorch and incinerate are the same thing.


You stated: "Yeah me and everyone who made/uses the dictionary." I focused on the "everyone" part because that's where I wanted to focus on. Where am I lying?

Me, when I want doing a funny, ha ha calculation about a fictional character and start making people doubt the definition of words in the English language (+I'm French):

https://media.**********.net/attachments/541765574422822922/970864741411061800/unknown.png
Joke aside, It seems nobody read the entire thing or noticed that the "Incinerate" Ends don't use any melting calculations. Only specific heat. (Just like the scorching Ends)

The definition of "Incinerate" was only used to support Boros statement about being able to vaporize bones. But even if we will still use the scorching statements I could still apply it since CSRC should technically have a temperature equivalent to or greater than Boros's weaker energy blast.

Which works with the exact same principle as CSRC :

Energy blast : "I've released a vast amount of energy from within my body... Not a single bone will be left from any small fry touching it!"
Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon : "I'll release all of my energy to blow away you and the planet surface!"

He just release the energy within his body at his opponent in both case. So I take them as the same for these Ends.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

The definition of "Incinerate" was only used to support Boros statement about being able to vaporize bones. But even if we will still use the scorching statements I could still apply it since CSRC should technically have a temperature equivalent to greater than Boros's weaker energy blast.

Which works with the exact same principle as CSRC :

Energy blast : "I've released a vast amount of energy from within my body... Not a single bone will be left from any small fry touching it!"
Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon : "I'll release all of my energy to blow away you and the planet surface!"

He just release the energy within his body at his opponent in both case. So I take them as the same for these Ends.

I take it that's the reason for incinerating?

 

[UeTa]

Also for furtherproof, here some pictures of the "Incineration" caused by Released Boros energy blast to his spaceship.

https://media.**********.net/attachments/541765574422822922/970875925170384906/unknown.png-Big, BIG fireball

https://media.**********.net/attachments/541765574422822922/970875411972124682/unknown.png - Molted metal in the background

https://media.**********.net/attachments/541765574422822922/970875741900259398/p_40.png?width=470&height=675 - After the ball of extinguished, the place was still a little molten/ignited. (You can see ashes in the air)
https://media.**********.net/attachments/541765574422822922/970875503701553183/unknown.png -You can see chared pieces of metal rising as Boros power-up

https://media.**********.net/attachments/541765574422822922/970875578876047410/unknown.png - A view of the crater

 

[UeTa]

I take it that's the reason for incinerating?

Pretty much

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Ah so the databook scan says scorching going Qawsedf's translations and the manga scans show incinerating. Aight

 

[UeTa]

Ah so the databook scan says scorching going Qawsedf's translations and the manga scans show incinerating. Aight

Aaaah, I see I see.

 

[Tural2004]

so the databook scan says scorching going Qawsedf's translations

Well, as far as I know, scorching is just a more accurate translation but incinerating is also correct. There should be no problem with using incineration.

 

[Tural2004]

Btw after seeing the exact definition of "scorching" and "incinerating", am I the only one who thinks incineration makes much more sense for CSRC?

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

I feel going off just manga scans, it looks more incinerating than scorching, but the calc guys may say otherwise I dunno.

 

[Kachon123]

Incinerating seems way more accurate. That's what his energy is consistently shown to do in the manga, regardless of what the databook says. Especially since scorching can be a byproduct of incineration.

 

[XVII]

man i just want tier 5 boros, is that too much to ask?

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

man i just want tier 5 boros, is that too much to ask?

Who needs female dogs when you have the homies

 

[Maverick_Zero_X]

https://media.**********.net/attachments/852867462680281141/970928444831588362/IMG_5405.jpg

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

https://media.**********.net/attachments/852867462680281141/970928444831588362/IMG_5405.jpg

Bro that looks ******* sick

 

[Cryo123]

You linked me a website. Not a source. Show me where they say scorch and incinerate are the same thing.

Firstly, I was trying to show you that many scholars are responsible for the dictionary. I never thought them being synonyms was in question, so here's the Thesaurus so you can stop saying they're not synonyms.

You stated: "Yeah me and everyone who made/uses the dictionary." I focused on the "everyone" part because that's where I wanted to focus on. Where am I lying?

If I say everyone in a group/demographic does something, it's different from saying everyone does something. You are actively misrepresenting my statements. Even if it wasn't lying by omission, it's just an asshole thing to do.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Firstly, I was trying to show you that many scholars are responsible for the dictionary. I never thought them being synonyms was in question, so here's the Thesaurus so you can stop saying they're not synonyms.

In every other website I can find, they mean different things. And even on the same website you link, they list the meanings as different things.

If I say everyone in a group/demographic does something, it's different from saying everyone does something. You are actively misrepresenting my statements. Even if it wasn't lying by omission, it's just an asshole thing to do.

What did I misrepresent? I asked who was this everyone you were referring to and quoted the "everyone" section of your question.

 

[Cryo123]

What did I misrepresent? I asked who was this everyone you were referring to and quoted the "everyone" section of your question.

I didn't say everyone. I said everyone who wrote the dictionary. Then I linked an article saying that 320 qualified individuals worked on it, so you know god damn well I answered who the "everyone" was.

In every other website I can find, they mean different things. And even on the same website you link, they list the meanings as different things.

Synonyms can have slightly different definitions. They are just very similar.

 

[chosen]

https://vsbattles.com/threads/garou-downgrade.135658/

I was asked to

 

[Cryo123]

https://vsbattles.com/threads/garou-downgrade.135658/

I was asked to

Sometimes, just saying no is the best option lmao.

 

[Maverick_Zero_X]

Garou obliterating Platinum S and splitting Sage Centipede in half are just skill feats

Wut

 

[Magmag]

Wut

Garou got omnipotent skill negation ig

 

[Superscharbe]

https://media.**********.net/attachments/852867462680281141/970928444831588362/IMG_5405.jpg

Boros>Garou

 

[Tural2004]

Boros>Garou

Indeed