• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Could you check this when you can?
You and me one one one !!!! arghhh
asta vs ben with master control 5-C
Hey Astral, I wonder if the Animator in Family Guy could have Paraconsistent Physiology Type 1? Because their transcendence encompasses existence and non-existence (The Void) in verse.
Hello, can you please comment in this thread:
Screenshot-2026-06-13-220217.png

im going insane
Kachon123
Kachon123
I guess that line from Murata can be used as added support then (just in case Saitama did put enough effort). We already rate Tatsumaki as having better speed than Geryu so her blitzing her own rock throw should be valid?
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
Like, to justify the calc as scaling off her own rocks' speed? She blitzed them so clearly it wasn't her max speed, I don't think Saitama's statement would necessarily extend to that.
Kachon123
Kachon123
I'm saying that Tatsumaki's > Geryu statement would apply to the tornado rocks due to Saitama's reactions to the both of them. Saitama's reaction to Geryu as opposed to Tatsumaki could also support him hitting away the rock at sub-light speed
Would you like to vote here?
Rusty can you please check the "volumetric destruction" part of the first calc of this thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/chainsaw-man-minor-calc-fixes.192098/

@ElJoaki5 tagged you a few days ago alongside a few other CGMs but you didnt came, its only about violent fragmentation being used over fragmentation for Oregon Sword compression, Eljoaki5 wasn't sure so he wanted some other CGMs to give their opinion
TheRustyOne
TheRustyOne
I have so many problems with many of those calcs that it actually annoys me.

I don't want to start an argument, nor do I care enough to try. I'm already stressed enough, so I'd rather not have people yell at me.

Ask someone else.
Breadbear83
Breadbear83
I didn't say about needing the 5 calcs (all are evaluated, some accepted some rejected(, just the Oregon calc in the violent fragmentation part if you could check I
But I can find another CGM then, sorry If I annoyed you
I just need one more check here on the mach 1 cap please
could you check this when you are available?
Hello, if you can, could you look at this CRT?
Hello, if you can, could you look at this CRT?

Hey Maverick. hope your well. I know you won't know this verse, but due to it being new & not well known, revisions for it aren't getting any traction here so far. Whenever you have a moment, I was hoping if you could please give your thoughts on this thread I made.
Can you please evaluate this thread? Its about downgrade from Tier 1

Can you please evaluate this thread:

Can you please evaluate this reaction feat, and potentially this AP feat?
Pls help me Agnaa

Hello Elizhaa, I'd appreciate your input on this small thread.
Idk if you can evaluate calc's (but I've asked all CGM atp), but would you be able to evaluate this "somewhat controversial" feat? I feel obligated to also show the two other versions (1 and 2) and having this feat evaluated it would be appreciated!
Idk if you can evaluate calc's (but I've asked all CGM atp), but would you be able to evaluate this "somewhat controversial" feat? I feel obligated to also show the two other versions (1 and 2) and having this feat evaluated it would be appreciated!
Hello, if you can, could you look at this CRT?
Back
Top