• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hi, I'm a new user, but I've been lurking (without an account) for a few years now. Reading a few SCP articles in relatively quick succession (Decibelles' ...Like Clockwork series, Ori's Proposal, Eastward of Eden, and altoid-clef, with a few in between) finally encouraged me to start taking my life into my own hands - and one of the ways I'm doing that is joining this site. I was planning on making my first post a CRT for said verse, but, well, you know what's going on. So, instead, I came to ask permission to comment on the referenced thread, and I guess congratulate you for the work you've done on the wiki - not just you, of course.

Reasoning for commenting on said the thread (do I need this part? I'm adding it anyway): Who is He? was deleted - as Bambu points out it's AI generated; and such content is banned on that wiki. A Journey Through the Afterlife was also deleted, but I don't know why - it's not showing up on the deletions thread, unless I'm being an idiot. The deletions thread also serves as a good counterexample for those who claim there's no oversight or whatever - it was only created on the 18th of March, but it has 8 pages full of deletions. BAROQUE was clearly written - at least in part - to demonstrate that the Department of Unreality was not, in fact, Tier 0. And indeed, it shouldn't be; WOG states that SCP-7909 - the article that makes the Department big 0 - was intended to take place in a different continuity from "regular" Unreality. As such, it is not featured on the Unreality hub, which only houses articles consistent with each other - thus, if by some miracle SCP stuff doesn't get removed we should probably only use articles on that hub. Consider it from Fishish's perspective; some guy writes an article that goes against the core concepts of the Department you helped create - it explains unreality, and gives the Dept. members (other than Alex). (Remember the Department's members don't exist - so they aren't there.) Then another guy starts asking how powerful Alex is - whilst completely misunderstanding Alex and Unreality. Then you discover - either via simply searching for the Department of Unreality on some web browser, investigating why this guy was interested in how powerful Alex Thorley was, or something else - that some other guys had made this thing, claiming that Unreality was this really powerful thing - because of that first guy's article - whilst misnaming Alex, and depending on when Fishish read it, misgendering Alex too. With this in mind a reaction like BAROQUE makes perfect sense, at least to me. I have a lot more to say on this matter, but since I've only slept like 6 hours in the past 3 days, I'm really f-ing tired, so night night, I guess.
Sir_Ovens
Sir_Ovens
I think most of these points have been said and the thread is more or less concluded but if you wanna add something go ahead you have my permission.
Some_sentient_water
Thanks. Sorry it took so long to respond; life happened.
Hello, I hope I'm not annoying you, but I noticed you know some japanese so, do you think you could translate the following please?
bUQOkCU.jpeg

加速のための関節などいくらでも増やせる。
百でも千でも、なんぼでも。

It's only the last 2 panels, the first one is unimportant.
Hello, I hope I'm not annoying you but, do you think you could translate the following please?
bUQOkCU.jpeg

加速のための関節などいくらでも増やせる。
百でも千でも、なんぼでも。

It's only the last 2 panels, the first one is unimportant.
Could you evaluate this? It needs only 1 more staff vote.

Could you evaluate this? It needs only 1 more staff vote.

Sorry to bother you, but I have a question: What is the Tier of the Inaccessible cardinals and Berkeley cardinals under the new system?
Hello! if you have time, can you please check these out?

Sorry to bother you, but the evaluation of moderators is really necessary in this crt, not only for its approval but also because an impasse was reached due to apparently not having standards defining what qualifies as "limited".
I have a question. This character resists being sucked into the Black Hole. Does a calculation need to be made for this LS feat or can it be added directly to the profile? If it can be added, what LS Tier does resisting being pulled by the Black Hole give?
Sorry for editing the Pacific Rim pages. I thought that I was allowed to make the changes now
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Oh!

You didn't link the CRT, so it had appeared as though they were baseless. Given the formatting being weird (no commas and whatnot) I had taken this to mean that you didn't know our policies.

I may still want to discuss this, since the kilogram stuff seems... very very strange, at best, but I didn't realize you'd done this. In the future, when the edit prompts you to explain what you did, it is our policy to link to the related CRT.
1000TonsofFun
1000TonsofFun
Oh ok. Thank you, I didn’t realise you were supposed to link the CRT in the edits.
Where can I read this Broly comic you mentioned here? Are there any feats?
  • Like
Reactions: Phsccarvalho
Phsccarvalho
Phsccarvalho
I mentioned it here, but I don't know if it has much to the powerscaling question
Hi, could you please give your input here? It's just a simple calc application.
Hello. can you check this out ?
Hello. can you check this out ?
Could you evaluate this? Need just 1 more vote

Could you evaluate this? Need just 1 more vote

Could you evaluate this? Need just 1 more vote

Hello, glass, I was having a bit of a confusion at what rating to use for a certain thing, so the question :

There is a thing called "Soul"[as a whole], which has 3 layers, "Ego", encompassed by "Core", and that than encompassed by "Soul"[the Layer that's actually called Soul], and all of this is made of information[type 2]

  • if you destroy the Soul[the actual soul layer], its stated that a being "ceases to exist" and "disappear" and "their existence collapses", "reduced to nonexistence" but they can still reincarnate, basically, they can resurrect after existence erasure of this level, because their core still remains, as long as that remains, they can reincarnate
  • yet if you destroy a "core", they won't be able to resurrect, its true death, no resurrection or reincarnation

does that make a "Core" Nonexistent [Aspect type 4{information]?
Theglassman12
Theglassman12
No since it’s not damaged, let alone erased whatsoever. It would only be nonexistent if it was already erased in the first place.
Astral_Trinity439
Astral_Trinity439
I see, than how would we distinguish between the info type 2 of core and the info type 2 of soul? Like if a unique character could regen from even a core, would his HGR still be the same as characters that regened from soul only? [in this case both are info type 2 so would would be HGR]
Do we just give it a "Layered" or "Enhanced" or something?
Theglassman12
Theglassman12
That doesn’t really sound like enhanced regen since that doesn’t make any sense without it going the higher tier of regen. If there’s still information left then that just means all the information is still there, so they wouldn’t have high godly since they still have that remaining and it didn’t get destroyed only for them to regenerate it.
Hi, could you please give your input on this? It's a simple calc application for an old feat.
Can you unlock Tail's profile so I can put this matchup on his page
Hello! if you have time, can you please check these out?

Can you unlock Tail's profile so I can add this versus thread?
If you have some time, could you comment on this, please?
Hey elizhaa, can u take a look at this thread?
Can you lock this?
Back
Top