• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts


can this thread be reopen?
1. it didnt even reach the disagreement limit to be closed and
2. I had a grandtotal of 10 minutes to create a counterargument before closure, which is not enough
DarkGrath
DarkGrath
Out of respect to your case, I've decided to take a thorough look through the thread, including the scene in which the feat occurs and your arguments regarding it.

Nothing about this is tier 1. Even if we take the scene itself as valid canonicity, filing a bug report to ask the developer to make a new ending is manifestly just a 4th wall break. We don't scale characters off of scenes like this, and this was clearly established on the thread itself. Unless you have genuinely novel input to provide regarding the feat, I would suggest this topic is dropped.
BasedNecoScaler69
BasedNecoScaler69
DarkGrath
Out of respect to your case, I've decided to take a thorough look through the thread, including the scene in which the feat occurs and your arguments regarding it.

Nothing about this is tier 1. Even if we take the scene itself as valid canonicity, filing a bug report to ask the developer to make a new ending is manifestly just a 4th wall break. We don't scale characters off of scenes like this, and this was clearly established on the thread itself. Unless you have genuinely novel input to provide regarding the feat, I would suggest this topic is dropped.
valid concern, except there is no developer-like character in Ciel-sensei. Neco arc says "I" have to get this patched stat. Developers can file their own bug reports that they encounter to fix later. Ciel even says if you want to make a choice that leans towards arcueid, thats fine, but i cant guarantee what happens to the town afterward. Neco instantly goes to try and choose arcueid, implying no gap of time at all.
DarkGrath
DarkGrath
With all due respect, my message wall is not a debate platform. My investigation of the thread, the sources, and the arguments for and against the change were not done with the intention to continue this debate here - it was to express the fact that I will not be reopening the thread, as it was closed for manifestly valid reasons.

If you believe that there is genuinely more to discuss, and that there are novel arguments which were not made on the original thread, you are allowed to make a new thread to express these arguments. Making multiple threads on the same refuted topic can constitute a rule violation, but this is almost exclusively enforced in cases of users essentially quoting their last arguments verbatim - if you have new information to provide that wasn't on the original thread, no trouble of this sort should occur.
I noticed you liked horror stuff, I think I would like that
Eseseso
Eseseso

Just needs 1 more staff.
Eseseso
Eseseso

Just needs 1 more staff.
Hola bro. Me preguntaba si tu podrias dar tu opinion aqui, por favor.
Apex_Predator_GX
Apex_Predator_GX
Dame una pagina donde hayas comentado varias veces y yo me encargo de darte likes
Dereck03
Dereck03
image.png
Apex_Predator_GX
Umm, i told him about his unban report and he said he can do conversation if we do a gc, like u me and you here my
discord :- twilight_op

Plz send me req so that I can add u to gc ?
If u can do this it would be great help
DarkGrath
DarkGrath
Understood. I have sent you a friend request on Discord.
I made the crt of the controversial abilities of causality and nullification of power from that crt of Woody.

I need you to ping the staff members who voted for these skills or skills that replace them, like @Lonkitt preferring Technology Manipulation over Limited Power Nullification.

In this case, I think it was you, Lonkitt, Andy and probably DDM (but the poor guy doesn't understand what's happening to this day)

This is for them to confirm their previous votes.
Hello. Do you still want people to not send you messages on here? If so, sorry for the inconvenience.
  • Like
Reactions: LuffyRuffy46307
Lonkitt
Lonkitt
Feel free
pineappleman
pineappleman
Could you check out my thread if you have the time? Thanks.
Sorry to bother, but could you check the explosion part of this calc you already evaluated? Recently I was doing again the math to see something but noticed that when doing the formula
941.19560439^3*((27136*1.37895 bars+8649)^(1/2)/13568-93/13568)^2
I get 67 Kilotons instead of the 35.46 Kilotons that I originally got then, so I want to see if I'm making some mistake now or if I did a mistake then, and in case of the later correct the calculation.
Flashlight237
Flashlight237
Yeah, I went and checked and I got 67007.77324 tons of TNT. So yeah, I messed up on that part.
Expectro2000xxx
Expectro2000xxx
Well, to begin with it was my fault for making the mistake and don't notice I don't even know what I did to get like half the result. Already corrected the calculation.
About your propasal in the TR thread, I assume that the requirements would not only apply to create crts but also make calculation or edit the profiles right? As those are also part of the problem that made thing reach this point.

Asking here instead of the thread as it's staff only.
First_Witch
First_Witch
That would be correct, although now that you mention it, monitoring that on the wiki itself might be a bit more annoying considering how archaic Fandom is.
Hi hi,

may I have permission to repost what was deleted in the TR deletion thread
DarkGrath
DarkGrath
Yes, you may. Do be sure to note that I gave you permission to avoid further confusion.
Back
Top