• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Could you give this CRT a quick check please?

excuse me, can you evaluate this crt?
Hello
I replied to you in the thread, but I'm afraid that my notification will get lost among a bunch of others, so I decided to write to you on the wall againI tried to formulate exactly what changes in the AP policy I want to make. You can say in the thread what you think specifically on this point, because the LS issue is already being resolved.
Regarding V5's use of amalgam replacing Disciplines such as Vicissitude and Dementation, could that perhaps speak to what Disciplines the respective Antediluvians fully mastered? While I dislike the idea from a gameplay perspective, it does seem as though it carries some lore implications regarding how those unique Disciplines came to be.
Udlmaster
Udlmaster
I thought about that, but I've decided for the most part to ignore v5 and focus on 20th for now.

The only exception I make to this rule is Malekai, who's special Discipline being a mix of Dementation and Chimerstry, and this was stated in ToJ.
hey mind giving an input here at your feee time? It’ll be really appreciated. Thanks
Hi Qawsedf, I have a question about High-Godly Regeneration
High-Godly: The ability to regenerate after the erasure of body, mind, soul, and at least one other fundamental aspect of a character's existence. Such an aspect could be their place in the narrative, their history, their information (Type 2), their concept, et cetera. For any aspect to qualify, destruction of that aspect must cause erasure of the character in some form and it must be shown that the character cannot exist without that fundamental aspect existing as well; in addition it must not be something that would ordinarily be restored by regenerating body, mind, or soul. As such, type 3 concepts must be evaluated with care and aspects which are not sufficiently expanded upon to make a judgement will not to qualify.
What exactly does the above-mentioned "Their History" mean? Does it mean that a character who can be regenerated after being erased from the present and the past will have High-Godly?
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Their history means that the person was erased throughout time. So it's as if they never existed in tbe first place.
  • Like
Reactions: Aolphl
Could you evaluate this please?

Could you eval this thread when you have time please?

Could you help me with this?
Could I get your input on this CRT?
Could I get your input on this CRT?
Hello, mind giving input here?

Hey, I had a simple question.

If a character goes at incredible speeds to the point of being able to blitz a character, but for this speed, they mention that they didn't run but instead just kicked off the ground very hard and dove towards that person, will KE of that person during the feat be usable in that case?
RoggerReggor
RoggerReggor
Thanks for the reply.

The character mentioned that he kicked the ground when blitzing off other character. The calc which gets the speed itself doesn't use calc stacking, but the character outright mentions that he did kick the ground. I didn't get what you meant by "direct", does that mean that the character itself states a speed of the feat (like basically saying "I went at 50 meters per second."?

This is the feat, and this is the calc of the feat.
Flashlight237
Flashlight237
By "direct", I mean the speed value of the character they blitzed had their speed value either directly stated or shown in the series.
RoggerReggor
RoggerReggor
I see, thanks for the help, once again.
Could you check this thread? It's a fairly evident one. Thank you! 🙏

If you have some time, could you review this?
Happy woman days 🥳 🎉 🎂
Dereck03
Dereck03
:pepeesoacial~1:
If you have some time, could you review this?

Despite the name, it is a Regular Show calculation, lol

Could you evaluate it? It will be used in a Verse-wide revision
Hi, hope you're doing well!

If you could please check out this CRT, I would greatly appreciate it:


Best,
Can you evaluate this please?

Can you take a look at this when you get a time?
Back
Top