• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

[No title]

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thebluedash

VS Battles
Joke Battles
Retired
1,446
301
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Kkapoios/Saitama_Splits_the_Atmosphere

First off, the calc is fine, I have no problems with it. We shouldn't, however use the high end. It's an assumed timeframe based on nothing much really and we normally do low end/mid end for these type of things. . So low end/mid end result = Continent level.


Also why are we using likely for Saitama's planet rating? It's a statement from a book. "Possibly" is the word to use here.
 
Boros' ultimate attack was also measured at Multi-Continent level, though. By ChaosTheory, that is.
 
In the anime as Saitama punches Boro's attack there is a quick zoom out showing the moments just before Boro's fires his attack, immediately we see the attack is dispersed right as it appears on screen.
 
@Aqua using anime timeframes is not allowed

@Ever oh that works, now i feel dumb.

EDIT: Don't agree anymore. Read my newest comment.

Anyways seriously know can someone change likely to possibly. So I can just close this?
 
I getting some sleep, but anyway we are using the manga feat as Chaos based his calc on the manga version and the offical guidebook statement of Boro's most powerful attack being planet level as well.
 
Actually...No.. Boros's calc was based on a statement. Thus can't be used as a "certain" rating. It can only be used as a likely. So still Saitama downgrades.
 
Starkiller215 said:
I getting some sleep, but anyway we are using the manga feat as Chaos based his calc on the manga version and the offical guidebook statement of Boro's most powerful attack being planet level as well.
Statements, statements... Cannot be used as the 100% for sure rating.
 
@Theblue As much as we not gonna ignore that, there is the fact Saitama didn't show his true full power in that fight as Boros mentioned and stated that he have not yet draw his true "fangs" as in Saitama being stronger than Boros when in his Serious mode.
 
I'm not sure if you're new here, but let me give some info just in case. Being casual does not get you a better tiering than what you have shown. Nor do statement feats for the most part. It'll give you a "likely" or a "possibly". But nothing more.
 
@Theblue I not new to it as I am aware of that, but he was petty serious when he went against Boros later on in the fight. In fact he even said "Serious Series" or whatever it was again in that case
 
Uhh what's the point of showing me this? The result of the calc was continent level. A statement does not relate to a calc. I honestly don't think you're understanding the words I'm typing : / .
 
@Theblue We are going by the offical statements and the fact you mention him being "casual" when he was casual at first in his fight against Boros. In any case there is also this scan:
IMG 0174
 
Thebluedash said:
@Aqua using anime timeframes is not allowed
@Ever oh that works, now i feel dumb.

EDIT: Don't agree anymore. Read my newest comment.

Anyways seriously know can someone change likely to possibly. So I can just close this?

Where on this site does it say anime timeframes aren't allowed?


Im not being accusatory, Im geniunely curious, I couldnt find it. I'm for now assuming you're right but would like some source as solid proof.
 
Starkiller215 said:
@Theblue We are going by the offical statements and the fact you mention him being "casual" when he was casual at first in his fight against Boros. In any case there is also this scan:
IMG 0174
What are you trying to prove here? I honestly don't get it. Mind explaining in an understandable manner? Cause at the moment, your arguments has nothing to do with mine.
 
From what I see, Blue is arguing about the AP result from the calc, not how easy the blast was to counter
 
@Thebluedash

So, what ratings do you currently wish to change Saitama's and Boros' statistics to?
 
@Theblue Because of the fact we can not just automatically assume it can not be planet level due to not hitting the surface of the Earth and how much damage it could truly cause if the move hit the ground hence the likely part. I disagree on trying to assume at the fact we never get the chance of see a powerful move being use against Saitama at its fullest effect and out of desperate measures as well. There is also the thing he could have being weakened during the later parts of the fight.
 
So then the best source is the anime since it is secondary canon due it if I remember correctly being overlooked by ONE himself and gives us an actual viewable timeframe.
 
Antvasima said:
@Thebluedash
So, what ratings do you currently wish to change Saitama's and Boros' statistics to?
Both mid end and low end are Continent level, so the rating I would recommend is "At least Continent level, possibly at least Planet level" (Saitama). Boros = "At least Continent level, possibly Planet level"
 
Reppuzan said:

Actually at 18 seconds in or so we see a FAR zoom out, if you look you can see the flash of light and there is NO beam or anything else, this indicates tha the flash is Boros charging up and then immediately after we see the beam appear on screen and is split immediately as wellm this zoomed out shot is a small flashback to right before Saitama's punch makes contact....this would actually give the timeframe of a second or so.
 
Hmmmm at this point if we using the secondary canon anime which it will be questionable to even do so as there are many differences between the manga and the anime series to the point I can point it out quite obviously by posting the links for each episode.
 
Starkiller what are you talking about? We're not talking about using the anime, I'm clearly saying not to use it.


EDIT: Nvm I gotcha replying to Aqua.
 
Starkiller215 said:
Hmmmm at this point if we using the secondary canon anime which it will be questionable to even do so as there are many differences between the manga and the anime series to the point I can point it out quite obviously by posting the links for each episode.

would say since the manga gives us no real timeframe, and that this scene in the anime does not do anything that cotradicts the manga's version I argue it can be allowed to be used as a source for the timeframe of the event.
 
@Theblue Probably me being tired at this point as I feel like I misread a lot of stuff hence the misunderstanding. It is a good idea to relax and rest for me here.
 
and even if we can use it. It won't matter in the slighest. As Repp has nicely stated for us. It's 8-10 seconds, which is still the downgrade.
 
Thebluedash said:
and even if we can use it. It won't matter in the slighest. As Repp has nicely stated for us. It's 8-10 seconds, which is still the downgrade.

its not 8-10 seconds at 18 seconds into the video we see the attack actually is within the timeframe of 1 second or so. Note the zoomedout shot, its goes by fairly quickly.
 
Assumed timeframe > Anime timeframe. I'm just replying to Aqua. Anyways, it doesn't matter what we use. It's a downgrade either way.
 
What are you arguing for is my question? Assumed timeframes are a thing here, you can't argue that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top