and the dimensions the author says are not high D. To me they seem like pocket sizes in the Universe. What else could it mean to say that they are elements in the universe?
Nah, I think they are legit mathematical Dimensions.
I don't think it applies to pocket dimensions, the dimensions here are mathematical dimensions.
Pocket sizes? Why do you bring up pocket sizes?
Bah, you didn't even read the Low 1-A explanation, didn't you? Even higher than that are still bound by levels of infinities, those Author's statement without further context is just baseline Low 1-A.
That shit is only on Low 1-A.
I think this is what the author was talking about in his answer to the question. "Dimensions are elements in the universe, some universes exist, some don't". it makes me think that the author is talking about pocket dimensons. It seems to me that he misunderstood the dimensons in the question asked and mentioned pocket dimensons.
Considering he uses "次元" it's more likely to be mathematical dimensions.
Instant Death is a verse that use the concept of higher dimensional continuum (Higher universe) that encompass, and embed lower dimensional universe as smaller part of itself with even higher dimensional continuum encompassing and embedding this universe, and so on.
vsbattles.fandom.com
"Such a set of various universes" is refering to this hierarchy of higher universes, in that no matter how many "higher dimension" is stacked against it, it will never reach Yogiri. Hence, I propose that the author knows he is refering to mathematical dimension.
Yeah, Low 1-A for me.
Fair to you.
The FAQ makes it pretty clear that it isn't Low 1A, but 1A
Where? Low 1-A is still on 1-A spectrum.
Did you mean this?
He did not misunderstand anything, rather you misunderstood it.
It doesn't say Low 1A. It says 1A. You're making shit up
My knowledge of Japanese is not very high, but the nature of the explanation seems to me to refer to the pocket dimensons, why would he use the phrase "some universes have it, some don't" for the mathematical dimension?
Really ?you are so smart huh
What about this?
I'm just gonna breakdown the three pieces of evidence in the OP and how I interpret them.
Low 1-A is still on the spectrum of 1-A.
No? They're two different tiers. Otherwise, you'd also be saying that High 1A is also on the spectre, despite the fact that the FAQ outright makes a distinction between the two
Ask Plank or Ultima.
And read Abaddon post above.
There is nothing in the answer that says you are guaranteed to reach tier 1-A, it only says generalizes to tier highe than 1-A.
It said "tiers". There are only two tiers higher than 1A: High 1A and 0. Taking this into account, it also means that Low 1A is also a separate thing as Low 1A, 1A, and High 1A are all part of the "Outerverse" section. So this argument still doesn't work either way.
1-A transcend aleph-2, not being on it. That Low 1-A. And the fact that the FAQ are still being revised.
1A is aleph 2...
That's the description for 1A
There's the description for Low 1A
Those are the literal definition of transcend bruh.
Who two?
The other one staff doesn't agree on 1-A, he agreed on Low 1-A.
Yeah so?
