- 10,116
- 11,488
...so it has a purpose.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Yet Another Scribblenauts CRT. (Finally some good resistances)
- Thread starter ShionAH
- Start date
-
- Tags
- maxwell scribblenauts
- 10,116
- 11,488
What stonewalling? Literally just explaining why I can understand Eficiente's argument.
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,037
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #43
You can reset it normally too. You can also die by norma- wait do you really thing people use that to reset the levels? It has no purpose other than to apply logic of “X adjectives = X maxwell”
The argument makes no sense though? The adjectives that kill you have no purpose other than to show you can effect yourself with your own powers. Which proves this CRT. Plus when you add the sleeping adjective you still get the effect with the animation and all that but Maxwell…is fine showing he has literal resistance to it
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,037
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #44
@LephyrTheRevanchist What you think about this:
I also believe maxwell needs the density manipulation with the "liftable" "heavy" "light" adjectives
I also believe maxwell needs the density manipulation with the "liftable" "heavy" "light" adjectives
- 10,116
- 11,488
That's your extrapolation.
- 15,441
- 5,031
Most people would use their common sense to conclude that he isn't affecting himself with his own powers, since that's so common, since he has little to no powers otherwise & resistances like that would be odd and since other powers from that powerful magic book can affect him. Other logic you use is too black and while on whether there is a purpose or not and if he can affect himself or not.
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,037
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #48
With that logic Maxwell would be a lunatic that kills himself for fun. He cannot control which ones effect him because the adjectives are right there on his text
Whataboutism
You cannot disagree with something because its “odd”
We go off by feats not our own thoughts on the game, Maxwell is not effected by some number of haxes but are effected by some other which is proof that he cannot choose which ones effect him which means he has resistance to ones that dont effect him. Especially sleep hax and petrification hax prove this.
@Eficiente Are you disagreeing with the CRT for any particular reason other then your own thought and opinion on the proposal?
Last edited:
- 15,441
- 5,031
Maxwell would be a lunatic that kills himself for fun if that was canon, it's not canon, it's something the players do for them to get a benefit.
You keep putting up excuses to deflect how I use rationality and allowing yourself to believe this nonsense, examples of how things that happen in games aren't 1 for 1 aren't Whataboutism, they are showing the limitations of that type of media and how not everything shown there is literal, something being “odd” can mean that another interpretation that isn't odd is more rational, so yes, one can disagree with something because its “odd”. We do go off by feats and we do also go off our own thoughts on games, because if everything was literal there would be all kinds of anti-feats and feats not intended happening, because that's not how games are built.
You keep putting up excuses to deflect how I use rationality and allowing yourself to believe this nonsense, examples of how things that happen in games aren't 1 for 1 aren't Whataboutism, they are showing the limitations of that type of media and how not everything shown there is literal, something being “odd” can mean that another interpretation that isn't odd is more rational, so yes, one can disagree with something because its “odd”. We do go off by feats and we do also go off our own thoughts on games, because if everything was literal there would be all kinds of anti-feats and feats not intended happening, because that's not how games are built.
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,037
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #50
With this logic nothing is actually canon. The player can just be AFK the whole game. This is not a good way to prove this feat wrong
“Maxwell doesnt effect himself with his powers on purpose/doesnt because its how the notebook works” is your arguement am I correct?
Well how do you explain the sleep hax which actually make effects on Maxwell but he resists the sleeping part, what about the petrification hax? It literally turns him into stone showing it works but Maxwell still moves. What about the EE and Death hax that both work and kill Maxwell? Why is this so hard to see?
- 15,441
- 5,031
Again, you are thinking this too extremely and in a black & white sort of way, the player killing the main character to reset things not being canon doesn't = that nothing is actually canon due to that being the logic used, that's insane. It just means that that one thing isn't canon because it would be crazy for Maxwell to kill himself but it makes perfect sense for a gameplay perspective. It's all an accumulation of things.
A 3rd staff would be nice, yeah.
A 3rd staff would be nice, yeah.
- 10,116
- 11,488
@DarkDragonMedeus @Firestorm808 @Damage3245 @LordGriffin1000
sorry y'all are my go-tos for these kind of things
- 31,372
- 34,119
Looks good to me.
- 10,116
- 11,488
I would prefer another one, just in case. Since we have one disagree, one neutral, and one agree.
- 10,116
- 11,488
My guy.
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,037
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #62
You can call @Propellus @Elizhaa or @Hop_Hoppington-Hoppenhiemer
They all are scribblenauts supporters
- 10,116
- 11,488
- 12,039
- 5,415
maxwell being affected by those abilities by doing it himself would destroy the whole purpose of the game in the first place
- 12,039
- 5,415
coz why tf would maxwell do that to himself??? YOU, the player are making him do this for gameplay purposes
- 15,441
- 5,031
@DarkDragonMedeus @Propellus Have you read my argument against this?
- 8,344
- 8,831
I have witnessed your arguments, but it just doesn't seem convincing enough to me
- 10,116
- 11,488
Why can't you follow simple things like waiting? Jesus christ.
Bendynoah10
He/Him- 669
- 145
i think you gotta wait longer but idk
- 10,116
- 11,488
That's not the problem. This has been opened for a few weeks. But Eficiente wants to make sure Medeus properly read everything, which is pretty reasonable.
- 8,344
- 8,831
I see, but still
