Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Fight to your heart's content in your favorite world and time period, and then destroy it in a heap and move on to another world."Well heroes still has it thankfully. And what was the shin budokai one originally?
Can you give me the japanese text"Fight to your heart's content in your favorite world and time period, and then destroy it in a heap and move on to another world."
This is a machine translation so it's probably not 100% accurate. Though the Kanji for a word like "endless" isn't there
And making it an exception while other verses are stuck to 2-B? This heavily contradicts our standards and makes the wiki looking like biased towards the verseAt this point I think that "2-B, possibly 2-A" for Heroes' characters might be the best option, but for now I will stay neutral and see other arguments.
It's-At this point I think that "2-B, possibly 2-A" for Heroes' characters might be the best option, but for now I will stay neutral and see other arguments.
According to OxfordEndless literally just means "so much that it doesn't seem to have an end", a bit like countless means "so much that it's impossibile to count". If we want to go from synonyms we'd make any countless timelines 2-A and that's obviously not the case.
And we always apply the second meaning for low end without further context.According to Oxford
Endless means having or seeming to have no end or limit.
There is an Explanation on who Demigra is in XenoverseEverything you just said was unfathomably incorrect and blatantly disregards everything that has been brought up in the thread to this point.
Can you give me the japanese text
My point was that we could give a possibly rating just from the implications that Heroes cosmology mirrors XVI personally think we should just give a flat 2-B, because we have only given that to other Verses with Endless Cosmologies and Heroes doesn't have any actual proof that its Cosmology is the same as Heroes. We would just be going off assumption because they share similar attributes, which is not something a proper Indexing Site that strives on accuracy should do.
This is not evidence even if said explanation doesn't exist. This is an assumption, which this Wiki should never use. Give actual statements that tell of a connection, otherwise, we are to treat them as completely separate Cosmologies.There is an Explanation on who Demigra is in Xenoverse
Their isn't in Heroes
He just shows up and they kinda expect you to know who he is already
If I'm wrong then find the explanation in heroes that explains who Demigra is
If by our standards endless cosmologies are 2-B, than I agree that Heroes' characters should be just 2-B.I personally think we should just give a flat 2-B, because we have only given that to other Verses with Endless Cosmologies and Heroes doesn't have any actual proof that its Cosmology is the same as Heroes. We would just be going off assumption because they share similar attributes, which is not something a proper Indexing Site that strives on accuracy should do.
They absolutely do explain who Demigra is, half the point of his debut story is to introduce him.There is an Explanation on who Demigra is in Xenoverse
Their isn't in Heroes
He just shows up and they kinda expect you to know who he is already
If I'm wrong then find the explanation in heroes that explains who Demigra is
This seems like a good solution, given the uncertainty with "endless".
BruhhhhhhWhy are we discussing "endless" when the statements we have don't have such word?
Context that DBH lacks. Plus AKM and Everything already pointed this outAre you certain? I thought that endless can mean infinite depending on the context.
I thought all of them would be at very least Low 2-C because upscaling from DBS charasEveryone else (which isn't many) will probably be somewhere in Tier 3.
Anyone who could qualify for that would already scale to Trunks, and thus be 2-C. I'm talking people like base Mira and Towa, early Xeno Bardock and Kid Buu.I thought all of them would be at very least Low 2-C because upscaling from DBS charas
Please explain further.Why are we discussing "endless" when the statements we have don't have such word?
Anyway, if there is indeed no mention of endless in the original Japanese text, I trust Dominodalek's sense of judgement.So this is what we currently have: everyone who scales to Xeno Trunks (who in turn scales to Past Demigra after absorbing Tokitoki) will be 2-C. Everyone who scales to TPU Mechikabura will be 2-B. Everyone else (which isn't many) will probably be somewhere in Tier 3.
Okay. Never mind then. That is just 2-B.The quote says countless instead of endless.
Wouldn't they be 2-B, since Tokitoki's responsible for the creation of all timelines and has restored the entire Multiverse on occasion?(who in turn scales to Past Demigra after absorbing Tokitoki) will be 2-C
Is there any way to argue that Mechikabura's 2-B feat was done with hax?Everyone who scales to TPU Mechikabura will be 2-B.
I think you're joking here but anyway...He gets his TPU form from the same black hole, so he actually gets boosted in power in the arcade. Basically the time he absorbed is what powers him up. He gets all the power from those timelinesWouldn't they be 2-B, since Tokitoki's responsible for the creation of all timelines and has restored the entire Multiverse on occasion?
Is there any way to argue that Mechikabura's 2-B feat was done with hax?
Although we do need clarification if having complete control over all space-time counts as AP which would obviously make Toki Toki 2-B in baseAs for TokiToki, we have some problems
He has 1 2-B statement , which however falls under stabilization feats
His True Form has a 2-B creation feat.
And in base he's comparable to DogiDogi, who is stated to be able to destroy all 12 universes. Which is 2-C