• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

World of Darkness revisions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Udlmaster said:
Oops I forgot to address these.

Quote 1: That's not what it says. The exact words are "defy conventional dimensional physics".

Quote 2: This is like really basic Tier 2 text, which God is already well beyond.

Quote 3: This, however, does seem like solid support for these realms being infinitely above/transcendent of the previous one. That's not to say it's 1-A, but it could help to support slightly higher Tier 1 ratings.

Quote 4: Transdimensional has never meant something is beyond dimensional without proper context.

Quote 5: Hyperdimensional definitely isn't 1-A unless the source material explicitly says otherwise.

Quote 6: That also does not seem to be what this says. It says that Ethers encompass partial states of material and metaphysical reality, but the purest Ether is only metaphysical.

Quote 7: Not really any sort of feat when taking the actual text of the prior quote into account.
 
So why exactly is the the string stuff dismissed? Aren't other franchises rated as High 1-C based off of string theory?
 
ZacharyGrossman273 said:
Only Homestuck, and even that has been questioned in the past
And even now, that rating is only a "likely", and may be changed later when I or someone with more free time and focuses combs through the comic, agai.
 
So does "1-C (Created X dimensions), possibly higher" acceptabke then? Or are we just doing 1-C
 
Fair point, although I think more context is needed for the Plato statement. Is predating creation not a 1-A feat? Existing before all concepts were formed? I thought there were characters that were 1-A for that.
 
I don't think predating creation in of itself confirms a 1-A rating. If it does then there's likely dozens of verses that would get a 1-A upgrade.
 
I'm not arguing for 1-A, I'm just say there is arguments for it.

And for the final time.

High 1-C doesn't come from Superstring theory.

Stop using it as a argument for non-High 1-C
 
Udlmaster said:
I'm not arguing for 1-A, I'm just say there is arguments for it.
And for the final time.

High 1-C doesn't come from Superstring theory.

Stop using it as a argument for non-High 1-C
To be honest, these statement in the OP states Superstring theory for High 1-C

"The Tapestry scales anywhere from Low 1-C (6-D) to upwards of High 1-C (11-D) with the introduction of Superstring theory, which echos the metaphor for the Tapestry, which is beyond words and even understanding.."
 
Nedge1000 said:
To be honest, these statement in the OP states Superstring theory for High 1-C

"The Tapestry scales anywhere from Low 1-C (6-D) to upwards of High 1-C (11-D) with the introduction of Superstring theory, which echos the metaphor for the Tapestry, which is beyond words and even understanding.."
That was an addition statement, not the full argument, I've said it 3 times after that, even showing how Azzy scaled the High Umbra is 11-D
 
Also, to be fair:

Someone creating the Concept where 11-D things can even exist =/= Small 11-D Planck Length fields.
 
So, if we low ball and say only a region is transcendant over the other.

Then there's 11-D with just the Low, Mid and High Umbra.
 
What are the conclusions so far?
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
11D isn't being accepted I think.
Like I said, it's stated the realms are transcendant, so, if we just go with an extreme low ball and say it only applies to the Regions, Low, Mid and High Umbra, that's still 11-D.
 
Just explain the scaling chain in a simplified format. Is it 8D chessboard -> Low Umbra -> Mid Umbra -> High Umbra = 11-D or something
 
Qawsedf234 said:
Just explain the scaling chain in a simplified format. Is it 8D chessboard -> Low Umbra -> Mid Umbra -> High Umbra = 11-D or something
Pretty much:

The Tellurian
 
If they're dimensionally transcendent then sure, I don't see why 11-D couldn't apply.
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
This is literally a graph you made on paint, that's not evidence of anything.
1. Photoshop.

2. I've never claimed it was a offical piece.

3. Yes, it is evidence of this, if you want, I'll throw the 100 pages at you where it states all of this.

I even went over this in my Respect blog, like, seriously, go to my Respect blog I covered most of it there.
 
Also, no one has addressed my point where the Sons of Ether created Quantum physics, which would mean that they have created the very idea of 11th dimensional Superstring theory as a concept.
 
So then, shall I go on to work on the Mage profile and we can sort out God in the mean time.
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
People don't trust you with the pages, Udl.
Literally has nothing to do with it.

Are you going to adress me or make ad-homimum attacks?

Because you just seem like you're dismissing my claims because: "Untrustworthy"
 
Just repost both the 8D quote and the three layers being transcendent above it.
 
Well the quotes makes sense I guess. If it's that controversial at least 8D, likely/possibly 11D is an alternative imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top