Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Link the thread where btw? I'm new to such stuff :CNinja'ed. But yeah. @SuperSonicTL make sure to always link the thread where the changes got accepted.
Link the thread where btw? I'm new to such stuff :C
He's been tagged already. In any case, if it was relying on a second CRT, the edits should be undone.
Just to clarify, my CRT thread didn't exactly rely on that specific general revision at all. My reasoning was solid and stood independently of any vague structure containing a universe or something like that. In fact, I provided one of the clearest examples of a 2A to L1C rating transition and I was the one who pushed for that general revision thread the hardest by constantly urging mods to look into it. Even the OP of that thread didn't show as much dedication to keeping it active. There is a reason why soo many upvotes was given to it that led me to apply it & there was a mod in itself who agreed to close it.yea the thread brought into question how tier 2 standards work so the staff thread was made to clarify things
Weird... Is it some kind of thing only mods could see through? @TWILIGHT-OP @StrymULTRAI tried and in the history section of the page it doesn't show that I put the cat link (of dmc ones) in describe what you changed section. What i do to show?
No.Weird... Is it some kind of thing only mods could see through? @TWILIGHT-OP @StrymULTRA
Blatant troll. Maybe a ban is needed.Someone changed Gojo's rating to High 1-A
Was about to report the guy for vandalizing the Ultra pagesSomeone changed Gojo's rating to High 1-A
I'm feeling something like a ~1 month editing ban, or a ~1 week overall ban, for this.09Kayson09: 9
- Changing a profile without a CRT: 7 (First Warning, Second Warning, Third Warning, Fourth Warning, Fifth Warning, Sixth Warning, Seventh Warning)
- Improperly formatted edit: 2 (First Warning, Second Warning)
I don't appreciate having this thread applied behind my back. Deagon and I still had issues with the revision that have yet to be addressed.Just to clarify, my CRT thread didn't exactly rely on that specific general revision at all. My reasoning was solid and stood independently of any vague structure containing a universe or something like that. In fact, I provided one of the clearest examples of a 2A to L1C rating transition and I was the one who pushed for that general revision thread the hardest by constantly urging mods to look into it. Even the OP of that thread didn't show as much dedication to keeping it active. There is a reason why soo many upvotes was given to it that led me to apply it & there was a mod in itself who agreed to close it.
If this is still a concern for you, I'd suggest getting that thread wrapped up first. My CRT thread was finalized fairly and on time. Of course, you're welcome to start a new thread to challenge it based on whatever arguments that one might present but leaving that unresolved thread to linger indefinitely feels counterproductive and reflects poorly on the wiki's policy as far as I'm concerned.
I'll keep that in mind but if this is anything of an indication, I feel we must resolve that general revision thread first, Sir. Ovens.I don't appreciate having this thread applied behind my back. Deagon and I still had issues with the revision that have yet to be addressed.
Not only is the proposal in itself an issue, but it also leads to a standard change that requires another thread to address. Please ping or DM us in the future if you wish to move forward with a revision with opposition next time.
Given the warnings, I'd be inclined to extend the overall ban duration from one week, but I don't feel it a case worth debating about. I think it's easier to apply an overall ban than to track an editing ban, so I cast my vote for the overall ban- I'll accept one week.@09Kayson09 Has made many edits without permission, often ones of a low-quality nature, and hasn't shaped up despite many warnings.
I'm feeling something like a ~1 month editing ban, or a ~1 week overall ban, for this.
Gave them instructionsYeah... Reporting Zedji for creating a completely new page without permission, Oh they also vandalized These two profiles.
History of user.
Found this user posting a low-quality profile, going back through their message wall I've found all these warnings for them going back 4 years, with similar issues still remaining.JustANormalLemon: 14
- Categories in userspace: 1 (First Warning)
- Creating low-quality profiles: 6 (First Warning, Second Warning, Third Warning, Fourth Warning, Fifth Warning, Sixth Warning)
- Improperly formatted edit: 7 (First Warning, Second Warning, Third Warning, Fourth Warning, Fifth Warning, Sixth Warning, Seventh Warning)
He did vandalise some other profiles 2 days ago, and I gave him instructions too, but looks likes he either ignored it or didn't saw it.
I had collaborated with him in making the profile of David the Davidian from the Battle for Dream Island series almost two years ago, and that profile wasn't reported for being too bad, so if you get to the point where you'd require him to be assisted by another user to spiffy profiles he develops, I recommend myself. As long as I'm not expected to research extensively about fictions I'm unfamiliar with, I'd be fine with helping him more.The warnings are spread out quite a bit. Still, one cannot sustain warnings forever. Proper "punishment" is beyond the scope of these offenses- bad edits are a poor reason to ban someone. But, perhaps an editing ban, or if the issue continues, a situation like BigSmoke may be advisable, where new pages and edits have to be passed along to another user to approve them.
@JustANormalLemon You. You really need to do better in creating profiles that fit our general wiki policies- at this point you really ought to be familiar with them. It's a trivial offense but it adds to the cleanup labor of the wiki. If you've got anything to say on the matter, I'd like to hear it.
Left them a warning.
Left him a warning.This guy's been changing Urashiki's speed without a proper CRT. I reverted it
Deleted, but I think that request would belong more in this thread.
HandledHi. I'd like to report this guy here. He had made 12 edits, each one of them being some sort of vandalism, from many different verses.