• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

So seems like other than Acasuality Negation, you didn't actually create a proper CRT to make the majority of those applications. Yeah, reverting your edits; learn how to apply a CRT properly by only putting up content that's actually been accepted and reviewed.
 
No linked CRT
 
Last edited:
No linked CRT
Edit seems to be done by good faith
 
No linked CRT
Left them a message.
Edit seems to be done by good faith
Still need a crt I believe, he's changing their statistics.
 
Ngl, do we have a guideline on how to attrach CRT or mention what things the edit gonna add/change/remove??. Cause while we have a small box in the bottom in editing mode for these things, many people do not know what it does or often missed it. Even me who have joined the site for a long time realized its purpose way later, many of my edits in early days do not mention CRT or what i'm going to change when editing the profile
 
Ngl, do we have a guideline on how to attrach CRT or mention what things the edit gonna add/change/remove??. Cause while we have a small box in the bottom in editing mode for these things, many people do not know what it does or often missed it. Even me who have joined the site for a long time realized its purpose way later, many of my edits in early days do not mention CRT or what i'm going to change when editing the profile
Yes we have:
When applying content revisions to our wiki pages, it is required that you always provide links to the discussion threads in the external forum wherein they were accepted by the wiki staff within the edit summary boxes. It greatly helps to avoid misunderstandings when the staff are patrolling edits, as they might mistake the changes for vandalism otherwise.
Reading the rules is important
 
There is also the following page, which our staff members keep linking to in welcome messages to new members in our wiki. 🙏

 
 
Wrong thread. Should go to profile deletion thread
 
Garrixian handled it. 🙏❤️
 
No CRT
 
No CRT
Couldn't find a crt for all the changes they made, so, reverted and warned.
 
Not sure if this counts or not but idk enough about the verse to give an answer.
Ability addition no CRT
 
Last edited:
Not sure if this counts or not but idk enough about the verse to give an answer.
I did some research and she is indeed trans, though, we're never really that specific when indexing genders of trans characters so I'll undo the edit.
Ability addition no CRT
This was rather very straightforward and obvious addition, I personally think it can be kept. Though, I can't say about other staffs here.
 
Yo.


Page was changed without a CRT. A... lot of times, actually. Granted, I do agree with a majority of 'em. Idk. Maybe contact the user and ask them to make a proper CRT?
 
I did some research and she is indeed trans, though, we're never really that specific when indexing genders of trans characters so I'll undo the edit.
We made a rule to not mention it in character gender sections. This contradicts Fandom's own practices, so I am not sure if it was a good idea, but our rules are currently what they are. 🙏
This was rather very straightforward and obvious addition, I personally think it can be kept. Though, I can't say about other staffs here.
Yes, it can be kept. Thank you for helping out. 🙏❤️
 
Yo.


Page was changed without a CRT. A... lot of times, actually. Granted, I do agree with a majority of 'em. Idk. Maybe contact the user and ask them to make a proper CRT?
Well, the changes seem self-evident, so I think that they can likely remain, but yes, it is best if you create a content revision thread, @Dragopentling .
 
We made a rule to not mention it in character gender sections. This contradicts Fandom's own practices, so I am not sure if it was a good idea, but our rules are currently what they are. 🙏
Oh, yeah, right, it is a rule and has been said in our editing rules section. I'll warn that user about it.
 
Well, the changes seem self-evident, so I think that they can likely remain, but yes, it is best if you create a content revision thread, @Dragopentling .
Tbf it was updating to Fanta's current calcs blog.

But if any further info comes in that may require another major calc or tier change then yea I'll make one, or Fanta can. I think the current revision should stay because it's already been a long while since the accepted calcs.
 
Last edited:
Reporting @Overlord_Darkness for publishing an unsolicited edit disguised as a CRT application:


No one in this CRT accepted CM Type 1.

 


This is a fan character, from a mod IN A game. And already exists in the FCOC wiki. And has poor formatting


 
Conceptual Manipulation was added to the article of the First Spinjitsu Master by @REX9097



Which apparently was from this CRT:


However, it should be noted that Firestorm has objectified and LordGriffin also said that CM1 was iffy.

Not to mention the entire reason why CM 1 was even added, seemingly was because of the unapproved CM 1 addition to the Overlord's profile.

Also, this was performed by @Lloydblitzed which has no CRT linked.


Also, this, also performed by @Lloydblitzed where it only had a single approval from DDM that literally included CM Type 1:

Okay, another shitshow by @Overlord_Darkness here.

 
Last edited:
No one in this CRT accepted CM Type 1.

If I remember correctly, CM Type 1 CRT wasn't made by me in the first place and all of staff members were neutral about CM Type 1 (non one for Disagree).


Okay, another shitshow by @Overlord_Darkness here.
This is basically redacting AE Type 1 as article claims: I need to write why he has this ability (specify what Overlord is) and, basically, AE Type 1 is because he is Concept of Evil (which is why he gained it in the CRT which upgraded it from Type 2 to Type 1). Any problem?


Reporting @Overlord_Darkness for publishing an unsolicited edit disguised as a CRT application:
Basically added scans which were used in the CRT about CM.
 
If I remember correctly, CM Type 1 CRT wasn't made by me in the first place and all of staff members were neutral about CM Type 1 (non one for Disagree).
Yeah, not approved.
This is basically redacting AE Type 1 as article claims: I need to write why he has this ability (specify what Overlord is) and, basically, AE Type 1 is because he is Concept of Evil (which is why he gained it in the CRT which upgraded it from Type 2 to Type 1). Any problem?
The article description only said the Overlord was darkness and evil, with no mentions of concepts or anything remotely similar. You seem like you do not understand our standards on abstract existence; being an abstract entity does not automatically qualify you to be a concept -- it needs direct evidence supporting it.
Basically added scans which were used in the CRT about CM.
An unapproved ability.
 
The article description only said the Overlord was darkness and evil, with no mentions of concepts or anything remotely similar. You seem like you do not understand our standards on abstract existence; being an abstract entity does not automatically qualify you to be a concept -- it needs direct evidence supporting it.
Anyway you can check this thread which explains why Overlord is the concept of evil (maybe staff members will finally take part in it). All of scans there.


Yeah, not approved.
If none of them were disagree nor agree doesn't it mean it can be added tho? If not, then my bad.
 
Which apparently was from this CRT:


However, it should be noted that Firestorm has objectified and LordGriffin also said that CM1 was iffy.
Iffy =/= disagree
Not to mention the entire reason why CM 1 was even added, seemingly was because of the unapproved CM 1 addition to the Overlord's profile.
Wasn't CM litterally accepted in the Tier 1 thread?
Also, this was performed by @Lloydblitzed which has no CRT linked.

I just added an ability he scale to due to having FSM powers listed on his profile. I don't see why I would need a CRT for that kind of precision. And I didn't know it wasn't accepted either. Just saw it on his profile


Edit: Actually no, we had 2 approvals on the matter, with 2 neutral, which means it was accepted as the neutral votes are meaningless
 
Last edited:
Wasn't CM litterally accepted in the Tier 1 thread?
Link that tier 1 thread and we'll see. Not to mention the tier 1 thread wasn't linked when CM was applied.
I just added an ability he scale to due to having FSM powers listed on his profile. I don't see why I would need a CRT for that kind of precision. And I didn't know it wasn't accepted either. Just saw it on his profile
I mean, hax doesn't scale like AP so it isn't as straightforward as you might think.
Edit: Actually no, we had 2 approvals on the matter, with 2 neutral, which means it was accepted as the neutral votes are meaningless
Firestorm clearly expressed disagreement, and DDM's last message on that thread was questioning the arguments for Type 1 CM. Anyways, it appears that both of you are rather clueless so I'll excuse y'all (can't say about other staff members), I hope none of you will be called out here again. If y'all want CM Type 1 to be applied back to the pages then properly get the ability accepted.
 

A few vandalisms on the profile
 
Freaky and weird name. I'd say permaban.
 
Back
Top