Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never agreed/disagreed/neuter with the thread in any form or shape.
Does not matter, her stance is notwithstanding valid. You can't simply invalidate a staff member's vote because they did not confirm their stance twice. She is an administrator, and she reached her own conclusion and provided input.I was gonna add them but I realized they wrote that before Phoenks responded. I would like to ask for an additional confirmation about their current opinion
These arguments didn't even originate from the episode as well, its just that the episodes popularity (lets face it GF threads aren't common) caused the thread to be created, and stryum already said that they were going to make a CRT alreadyI… don’t think anybody from this thread has a direct connection to the DB team lol. Some of the arguments from this are just based on what the recent episode said but the thread has no connection to the Death Battle team.
The logic is extremely flawed, it doesn't matter what supernatural geniuses in fiction can do, Ford is Ford, if it isn't proven that he can put the power of the portal over space into the power other machines can do with attacks & their durability then you would be assuming that happens for no reason. You can't assume that they can transfer the AP of the things they do like that just because they're supernatural geniuses and because it's fiction, you are literally inventing what they do based on what other characters have done in fiction.I disagree with the logic here for the Shacktron.
The materials needed to make something don't translate to how powerful the end result is when you are working with Extraordinary Geniuses.
People like Iron Man, Doctor Doom, and many other supernatural geniuses in fiction can make cosmic tiered weaponry and machinery with seemingly basic items at times. So this isn't a good argument in my opinion.
No, shaking that would be High 3-A since it's infinite in size. Likewise destroying it would be High 3-A. That's 1 infinity, 2-A would be all points in time across infinite universes and the space between them, the shaking is 1 far smaller thing that happens in the present.To shake the realm at all would be 2-A, as well. Since how could shockwaves reach anywhere in a 2-A realm without 2-A range?
Ford doesn't need to have 2-A extrasensory perception to feel this at the edge.
I disagree hard on those being "personal judgments", I go with what makes the most sense.All in all, the arguments you and Efi are making seem to be personal judgments on feats that are vague enough to be taken in multiple different ways.
That's a completely unreasonable thing to say, you don't know that, you made up that, the context doesn't leave it as something implied yet you bring it up anyway. The context is narration of Ford's adventures as he lives them, every now & then saying how new info from the future makes him re-think things he lived, but he comments on that, and here even says "There was no time to question why" in regards to that.I don't think Ford actually needed Enhanced Senses to realize that the Nightmare Realm shook, lad made the Portal and should know its capacities, thats why he immediately connected the dots that the portal was reactivated, no?
If I were to say something like this myself, I would be able to back it up. I expect as much from you when you have time.I think you're purposely leaving out stuff just to fit your narrative tbf
When a foe was ramming the Shacktron and forcing it back it got moved a little, if not harmed when hitting the ruins of a house. It's an anti-feat given that it has the LS to toss the monster it was fighting to the distance (At full power), but it's an insanely bigger anti-feat when saying that it dealt with a Bill at full power.And I am explaining why your reasoning for saying it isn't is weak.
I am agreeing with 2-A Shacktron.
I will reiterate that the materials something is made with have nothing to do with how powerful the end result is when dealing with supernatural engineers.
Aside from how that makes you feel, can you get deeper into why that is?There's no reason to assume that it didn't affect the entire multiverse just because he couldn't sense the entire multiverse in my eyes.
Ford is an extraordinary genius and almost always a reputable source.
I dislike the notion that "he can't sense it so he can't prove it"
It's like discarding any statement of someone having affected a multiverse from anyone who doesn't have 2-A sensory abilities. Just rubs me the wrong way personally.
Oh so you meant scaling Bill's everything to the rift. Normally, it would be pretty good that everything is gone with Bill defeated. However, we also know that his realm was getting into ours little by little over time as Bill tried to do that, this are opposite notions that disallow Bill's every punch, kick and energy beams to scale to the fact that the rift would one day destroy the universe.It's a result of Bill's presence and it goes away when Bill is gone.
1. Ford is a reputable source and there's no reason to think he's a liar here or just exaggerating. In like every case on the wiki we take people's word for things like this.
2. Time Baby referring to the multiverse is hardly a bad assumption when we know that the rip through dimensions occured in other universes as well. As supporting evidence it favors the 2-A side a decent bit.
This is a terrible argument, reply to my bigger version of why I disagree with it. How are this 2 points not the same? Saying it's a "rip through dimensions" is new; no, it's not, it just allowed rips/portals to be made, why are you overselling it like that? If it was through dimensions with its effects in other universes then those other universes would have the same leftover weirdness the town of Gravity Falls had, which they don't, we just have portals into them because the leftover weirdness are random powers happening, among them portals.4. Weirdmaggedon had affects in other universes even after Bill was defeated. Supporting it being an at least multiversal affect on reality. Which supports our overall claim.
That was before Bill grew them in size.Bill one shot Time Baby who scared all his minions (His minions being able to fight Shacktron, 2-A scaling)
I understand that the Nightmare Realm was accepted here as 2-A for being an infinite 4-dimensional structure.No, shaking that would be High 3-A since it's infinite in size
The same portal which shook the 2-A realm? I think it has more than just that.
Plus we do use engine scaling (context).
What do you think about haxWith how big the thread is, it would be better if comments like that come as a reply the biggest argument done against them.
Fair, since we also know Bill and his Henchman actually overastimated Time Baby (After bill kills him in the background his face is like “Holy shit! He died?”)That was before Bill grew them in size.
No, it's not on profiles or blogs accepted per a CRT.I understand that the Nightmare Realm was accepted here as 2-A for being an infinite 4-dimensional structure.
When the universe is affected, it needs to be proven that it goes as in "all of time from its start to its end".Anyway, if we ignore that, the rift should be Low 2-C since it was going to destroy the universe
From this commentand the fact that the rift disappeared with Bill's death is evidence that he was keeping it open.
Oh so you meant scaling Bill's everything to the rift. Normally, it would be pretty good that everything is gone with Bill defeated. However, we also know that his realm was getting into ours little by little over time as Bill tried to do that, this are opposite notions that disallow Bill's every punch, kick and energy beams to scale to the fact that the rift would one day destroy the universe.
Yes, like many things with Bill we can assume "he wasn't even trying and that's why X", but we're not making the character, what we see is what we got, and so that's the best Bill can pull his world into ours.
See other comments above about that.The portal should also be Low 2-C, since the rift is a portal just like the original and if I remember correctly, the rift originated from the portal.
The Shacktron was powered by the portal, so it should still be Low 2-C if 2-A is debunked. I'm pretty sure it's been accepted here several times to scale something from the engine that powers it.
Edit: Example:
I disagree with a lot, but we need to focus on this first. The Resistance to Power Null seemed ok to me, but the scale is on the level of a random totem pole, which is far weaker than Bill.What do you think about hax
We can not conclude that the Shacktron is being fed the power of infinite universes all at once, instead of taking in a constant, unspecified flow of energy that we should judge, on a whim. This is same as saying that a device powered by the sun must be star level without seeing proof. As a matter of fact it's worse because here the assumption is in the order of infinite universes.Shacktron can harm those that can harm it, and since if it didn't have the Durability to take being powered by... well infinity, it'd just destroy itself...
What is infinity divided by 999999999999?We can not conclude that the Shacktron is being fed the power of infinite universes all at once, instead of taking in a constant, unspecified flow of energy that we should judge, on a whim. This is same as saying that a device powered by the sun must be star level without seeing proof. As a matter of fact it's worse because here the assumption is in the order of infinite universes.
The thing is that (As I remember) the portal wasn't even supposed to do that, it was just supposed to open and allow someone to pass through it. It's something it did simply as a side effect of opening itself, and if they created a machine that uses the portal as an engine to power it, I don't see why I shouldn't be escalating to the power of something the portal does so casually. Especially when that kind of thing is accepted here repeatedly, not just the example I gave but there are more, examples like Sonic characters scaling to Low 4-C for defeating characters powered by the Chaos Emeralds, an Iron Man key scaling to 8-C+ because his arc reactor produces 8 gigajoules per second, and another key of Iron Man scaling to Low 7-B due to the power of his arc reactor even though his armor is simply metal.Good for that verse. But that doesn't mean that the standard assumption is that
- there are 0 inefficiencies in the mechanical components of a machine and its engine so that they both get the same power.
- That a machine made to do A (open a portal) can translate the power of that into B (powering up a robot).
- It's not even the general power it has when opening a portal, it's just what that did in the Nightmare Realm. Our universe wasn't moved.
- That this goes this durability as well for its metal & wooden surface. It's just a big robot made out of everything, it's tough because it's made tough, not because the portal powers its stats.
What-Our universe wasn't moved.
I mean how much Ford knew of the nightmare realm before this moment is up in the air, but yeah this sounds at least somewhat correct.I don't think Ford actually needed Enhanced Senses to realize that the Nightmare Realm shook, lad made the Portal and should know its capacities, thats why he immediately connected the dots that the portal was reactivated, no?
Non sequitur. Any value can be taken out of infinity instead of necessarily taking a lesser yet still infinite value out of it every time. That's why showings of the one employing any given source need to be evaluated instead of assuming the high end. Especially when this high end is endless infinities higher.What is infinity divided by 999999999999?
infinity.
Bill Cipher at it againDid someone change the name of the crt?
With Iron Man it makes sense as it's an actual engine and he can shoot a beam from it his armor can take. Otherwise, you can't assume anything used to take power from it to power something else is the same as a engine or a power source that gives off the same power as the best stat they have. Yes, a real engine may do that ( ...with no 0 inefficiencies in the mechanical components of a machine and its engine so that they both get the same power... ), but you don't know that's the same in when simply seeing "something being used to power something else", that information is way too little, it's nothing. It needs to be proven that they get to have all of its power. All the other issues still remain.The thing is that (As I remember) the portal wasn't even supposed to do that, it was just supposed to open and allow someone to pass through it. It's something it did simply as a side effect of opening itself, and if they created a machine that uses the portal as an engine to power it, I don't see why I shouldn't be escalating to the power of something the portal does so casually. Especially when that kind of thing is accepted here repeatedly, not just the example I gave but there are more, examples like Sonic characters scaling to Low 4-C for defeating characters powered by the Chaos Emeralds, an Iron Man key scaling to 8-C+ because his arc reactor produces 8 gigajoules per second, and another key of Iron Man scaling to Low 7-B due to the power of his arc reactor even though his armor is simply metal.
What-
(Yes, I know that you can't see the entire universe shaking, but it shows that the opening of the portal causes that type of thing)
I looked back at it. Dipper says that based on this on the journals, which may very well refer to Bill's weirdmageddon, as Ford depicts depicts it in the same way (Earth splits in 2, a crack on the ground with fire in it). I think it is very clear that the vagueness of how the writing didn't say that the portal would do that was used as a writing tool to mislead to the fact that it was actually Bill's power what would destroy the universe. Thing is, it doesn't matter, even if it was the portal Shacktron would still not scale to that for all the reasons given above. It would mean that I was wrong on a bit of what I said during that argument.“Our universe was not affected” while Dipper says it could destroy the entire universeYes I know he is a kid but he is listed as gifted in these supernatural stuff iirc
I had pinged Elizhaa at the first page, but now a summary may be in order.Someone should ping Ant and @Elizhaa they support Gravity Falls.
Being powered by a chaos emerald is not remotely comparable to reusing some unknown parts of a machine to create another machine. The arc reactor is also not remotely comparable since that’s a very clear cut “Iron Man is using the same power source for both”.Especially when that kind of thing is accepted here repeatedly, not just the example I gave but there are more, examples like Sonic characters scaling to Low 4-C for defeating characters powered by the Chaos Emeralds, an Iron Man key scaling to 8-C+ because his arc reactor produces 8 gigajoules per second, and another key of Iron Man scaling to Low 7-B due to the power of his arc reactor even though his armor is simply metal.
But you’re arguing that the end result scales to the materials that they were pulled from; actually even worse, that they scale to another machine that they pulled from. There’s nothing to ‘scale’ here, to give the Shacktron a tier based off material would require something FAR more specific than “we reused some of its parts for a power source”. The 'scaling' for the Shacktron here is so incredibly vague that it wouldn't even work for a possibly rating. I don't think even Death Battle would give the Shacktron 2-A based off 'portal scaling'I will reiterate that the materials something is made with have nothing to do with how powerful the end result is when dealing with supernatural engineers.
But who said it's being powered by infinity? Again, you're acting as if the scan for the Shacktron said it was 'powered by the portal' when it was 'we cannibalized some of the portals [wholly unspecified] parts to create a power source'. This is too vague to be used.Shacktron can harm those that can harm it, and since if it didn't have the Durability to take being powered by... well infinity, it'd just destroy itself...
But who said it's being powered by infinity? Again, you're acting as if the scan for the Shacktron said it was 'powered by the portal' when it was 'we cannibalized some of the portals [wholly unspecified] parts to create a power source'. This is too vague to be used.Shacktron can harm those that can harm it, and since if it didn't have the Durability to take being powered by... well infinity, it'd just destroy itself...
...You mean the Rift?It's a result of Bill's presence and it goes away when Bill is gone.
But said rips only occurred after the fact in a handful of universes, not the entirety of the multiverse? And when Blendin recalls the scenario, he said that Bill only 'destroyed the universe'. And that 'this dimension' is the subject of the sentence...etc etc. There's a lot more evidence he was referring to only Dimension 46, and there's none that points towards 2-A.2. Time Baby referring to the multiverse is hardly a bad assumption when we know that the rip through dimensions occured in other universes as well. As supporting evidence it favors the 2-A side a decent bit.
1. I'm more sympathetic to the idea.1. Ford is a reputable source and there's no reason to think he's a liar here or just exaggerating. In like every case on the wiki we take people's word for things like this.
2. Time Baby referring to the multiverse is hardly a bad assumption when we know that the rip through dimensions occured in other universes as well. As supporting evidence it favors the 2-A side a decent bit.
3. Time Baby refers to it as "your" rip in the dimension when speaking to Bill, so I don't think it's just the Nightmare Realm seeping in.
4. Weirdmaggedon had affects in other universes even after Bill was defeated. Supporting it being an at least multiversal affect on reality. Which supports our overall claim.
5. You have not provided a valid reason to not scale Shacktron.
6. Being a threat to the multiverse that also potentially erases dimensions just by being there for too long. Yes, being a threat to a 2-A cosmology in fact supports him being 2-A.
I feel like Bill only being 3-A is just...very weird in the shows plot.I'll also apologize if I come off a bit arrogant, but 2-A Bill is pretty patently a lot of assumptions stacked on top of each other. At best this would be a Possibly rating, but I don't think it's "Possible", I think it's just "Unlikely". We don't index profiles according to their highest potential strength, we index them to a reasonable standard, and a lot of the assumptions behind 2-A Bill are extrapolating things to their highest possible degree (the Shacktron had some portal parts so it must be 2-A! The portal shook the Nightmare Realm, so the Rift must equal the portal, and Bill powers some of the Rift, which makes Bill 2-A!), which doesn't really feel fit for the wiki.
The rift is a portal, and it was also literally created from the original portal.The Interdimensional Portal and the Interdimensional Rift are not the same thing. Bill's power/presence has nothing to do with the Portal, which is where the shaking feat actually comes from.
Blendin recalls the scenario, he said that Bill only 'destroyed the universe'
What that guy said.Blendin was simply... wrong here. Because he only said "Bill used my body to time travel and destroy the universe!", with the latter being false because the universe was never destroyed to begin with. I just don't understand how did it even accepted lol.
Many characters here scale to the engines/objects that power them even though it's not demonstrated what you said. You're just being picky with Bill and not seeing the most obvious and logical thing in the world, the portal produces a level of energy capable of shaking the universe/an infinite realm simply by activating (and it should be comparable to the rift, since the rift originated from the portal), if a machine is being powered by that, it must scale to that energy, or the machine would explode from not being able to handle that energy. You are saying that the Shacktron has a motor that when activated produces 3-A/Low 2-C/2-A energy but it only has it there as decoration.With Iron Man it makes sense as it's an actual engine and he can shoot a beam from it his armor can take. Otherwise, you can't assume anything used to take power from it to power something else is the same as a engine or a power source that gives off the same power as the best stat they have. Yes, a real engine may do that ( ...with no 0 inefficiencies in the mechanical components of a machine and its engine so that they both get the same power... ), but you don't know that's the same in when simply seeing "something being used to power something else", that information is way too little, it's nothing. It needs to be proven that they get to have all of its power. All the other issues still remain.
Personally think we got enough for a Low 2-C rating, 2-A though not unless we give him every last benefit of the doubt and all the highest ends available, in spit of many reasons to believe otherwise and his showings not being even close to it. Making it worse, many of Bill's own statements often refer to an individual world instead of many, let alone an infinity of them. The reasons to believe he is a threat to one at a time thanks to his immortality and powers far outweigh reasons to believe that instead he is a threat of immediate collapse to all.
Once again, in the absence of conclusive evidence and doubt, the safe end is what stays.
Things can be powered by higher sources without scaling to their full potential, especially in fiction. Androids in DBZ aren't given High 3-A because they have an unlimited energy source in their core. He-Man is powered by Castle Grayskull but we don't give him the highest rating it has based on that statement and nothing else. For accurate indexing, we can and should not ignore a character's displays with a power source to look only at what the source is stated do with all of its output released at once, or we step deep into the territory of extrapolating. And the Shacktron has all of nothing to show on a scale that would make me think 2-A. Either no one in the show has or no one has posted it yet.Many characters here scale to the engines/objects that power them even though it's not demonstrated what you said. You're just being picky with Bill and not seeing the most obvious and logical thing in the world, the portal produces a level of energy capable of shaking the universe/an infinite realm simply by activating (and it should be comparable to the rift, since the rift originated from the portal), if a machine is being powered by that, it must scale to that energy, or the machine would explode from not being able to handle that energy. You are saying that the Shacktron has a motor that when activated produces 3-A/Low 2-C/2-A energy but it only has it there as decoration.
I agree whole-heartedly with the Low 2-C, at leastUnless styrm and phoenks ever returnl think low 2-c is best, maybe a possibly rating for 2-A
BasedJust saying, I'm in the Low 2-C, possibly 2-A boat lol