Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why did you say this? ^Andytrenom said:Also FRA needs to be put in a coffin and buried alive, where it can die a slow and horrible death.
True. Especially (say) it is pretty hard to think of 7 distinct valid reasons to say Shriek wins "during training" Saitama.Andytrenom said:I forgot that saying something in a jokey manner doesn't always mean you aren't giving your actual opinion in a discussion
I greatly avoid using FRAs in a debate and don't appreciate it when my own threads become nothing more than an FRA spam.
But that being said, I realize that an FRA is technically just agreeing with someone else's arguments and even if it is misused frequently, that doesn't mean the concept itself should be banned.
So yeah, this thread is not meant to remove FRAs and I apologize for not keeping this in mind when I made my comments about the topic.Assaltwaffle said:That's a whole 'nother can of worms that can be covered later. This thread shouldn't start on that issue.
Genius.Sound of Infinity said:About the FRA thing, if people are just blindly FRA-ing? Simple! Don't count their votes.
Problem. Those votes are technically valid as long as the arguments they're FRA-ing are. Only do this if arguments have been completely debunked.Sound of Infinity said:About the FRA thing, if people are just blindly FRA-ing? Simple! Don't count their votes.
I don't think blind FRAs are legit votes. If people FRA, they will have to actually know what they're doing.The Wright Way said:Problem. Those votes are technically valid as long as the arguments they're FRA-ing are. Only do this if arguments have been completely debunked.Sound of Infinity said:About the FRA thing, if people are just blindly FRA-ing? Simple! Don't count their votes.
This is acceptable, for example ^PsychoWarper said:The only reason I use FRA is because my arguments/reasoning has already been stated, though I do understand the argument for quoting the person you are FRAing (unless its a wall of text).
My thoughts.CoreOfimBalance(COB) said:imo threads should be left open too once the vote is done just in case someone wants to add their two cents, BUT if the next posts are off-topic or irrelevant it should be considered for closing.
Well not exactly as this is not fully accepted yet, i mean the changes haven't been applied yet. So it's ok.Calaca Vs said:Oh shut. I just added a match before reading this thread. It was unanimous so... should I remove it until the 24hs?