• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Updating our wiki's striking strength naming conventions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
He/Him
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
164,976
71,705
Last edited:
Sure, yeah, should be an easy fix. We should preferably start with the Striking Strength page first.
 
Sure, I would be fine with it. I've been curious, why do we use "Class" for Striking Strength but "level" for AP and Durability?
Because we unwisely only did a partial revision from Polar-kun's old very bad striking strength system, but now we have the chance to fix that.
 
Sure, yeah, should be an easy fix. We should preferably start with the Striking Strength page first.
Yes, agreed, but we need a strong go-ahead from our staff here first, given that this is a very significant change.
 
Would that make DontTalk the grandpa and me his senile tag-along then?
 
Heh. I suppose that I will have to take that as a compliment. 😅
 
I am fine with what the OP says here and what agreed there.

Although personally I am planning on giving a new definition to the striking strength to differentiate it from the attack potency - but this will be in another thread.
 
So this means "Class" turns to "level"?

I mean I suppose that's fine, it would take some getting used to, but it's overall a harmless change
 
This is fine with me, makes it easier to make profile pages and fix it when new users make mistakes.
 
Sure, will take some time to get used to it for us but it's more intuitive, which is good for new users.
 
Not really an important change, but as the naming conventions are extremely similar I don't think it'll cause problems. Go nuts.
 
Well, Promestein has helped us our A LOT over the years with very crucial tasks that would not have been handled otherwise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top