- 8,675
- 5,560
Another 5,000 done today.
Hopefully I can finish this up by Monday. No promises.
Hopefully I can finish this up by Monday. No promises.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@PromesteinOkay.
If you go here to ask for help from Kirkburn (place "Question for Kirkburn:" in the title of the request message) and link to my post here to show that I sent you, you should probably be able to receive help and information swifter if you ask for it.
@Elizhaa @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @Shadowbokunohero @Crazylatin77 @Jvando @Zaratthustra @Just_a_Random_Butler @ElixirBlue @Tllmbrg @Nehz_XZX @Dereck03I think this might also hit Lifting Strength but I suppose that's not the biggest deal, not many people have Galactic or Universal LS
Thank you for helping out. It is very appreciated.Sure I'll.
Sure, I'll keep that in mind while doing wiki work.Would you all be willing to keep an eye out for inaccurately named lifting strength ratings in the areas mentioned above please?
Dang, thank you for your hard work.
Obligatory not staff but, for intelligence and stamina at least, I feel like those should not have bold markers, since unlike Tier, AP, Speed, Dura, and LS, Stamina and Intelligence do not really have concrete "levels" with defined boundaries, and putting those in bold would draw attention away from the explanation/context part of the Stamina and Intelligence sections, which should be prioritized over any actual label tacked onto it.I left a Discord message to you earlier regarding if it is realistically possible to add bold text markers to all of our current standard values for Intelligence, Stamina, and Range statistics as well, for the sake of consistency in our wiki, but there is obviously no hurry at all if it is realistically possible and you are willing to do so. Please enjoy the holidays as much as possible. ️
Yes, and Stamina ratings are still often listed as just "High" or "Very High", for example, but the automated changes would only affect the ratings that have been accurately worded (although recurrently not with the first letters capitalised). We would have to handle the rest gradually afterwards, which is perfectly fine as I perceive it.Range changes will prolly be the hardest to deal with, since that one is so wildly varied. The main stuff not involving meter/kilometer values like "Standard melee range", "Extended melee range" or "Planetary" range and the like would be effortless to pull off, but anything not that will be a bitch to handle.
Haven't Stamina ratings completely ditched those entirely?Yes, and Stamina ratings are still often listed as just "High" or "Very High", for example, but the automated changes would only affect the ratings that have been accurately worded (although recurrently not with the first letters capitalised). We would have to handle the rest gradually afterwards, which is perfectly fine as I perceive it.
Unlike the term "Dozens of Kilometers" or "Very High", "Several Meters" is actually a term on the Range page, so if you see one, don't convert it into something else. Unless you see "Several meters", then convert it into "Several Meters" so it follows proper capitalization.Also there's practical reasons like how people don't follow the labels for Intelligence, Stamina, and Range anywhere near as closely as for AP, Speed, LS, Dura, etc- so catching all the "Dozens of kilometers", "Several meters", "Very High", and other ones are gonna have to be done manually.
Bump.Progress report: Butler has already finished as much as practically possible, and while it's likely there's still some stuff remaining, it's impractical to demand perfection when our queries are so flawed, and I believe the remnants are insubstantial enough to consider this project completed. Should we close this thread?
I am fine with if we close this thread if @Just_a_Random_Butler agrees.Progress report: Butler has already finished as much as practically possible, and while it's likely there's still some stuff remaining, it's impractical to demand perfection when our queries are so flawed, and I believe the remnants are insubstantial enough to consider this project completed. Should we close this thread?
I am fine with its closure.I am fine with if we close this thread if @Just_a_Random_Butler agrees.