• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Universe level CRT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cause an explosion wouldn't be the only way to destroy all the celestial bodies in the universe and there are other methods, such as the shockwaves from the clashes between two characters.
Technically there isn't such a thing as conventional explosions and shockwaves in space due to lack of air to propagate it.


Thats why when nukes explode in Vaccum of space its called EMP not bomb.....cuz ots all Electromagnetic Radiations.

:v
 
Looks ok to me
Thank you for the evaluation.
Should 'For example' be placed before 'via an omnidirectional explosion'?

'Cause an explosion wouldn't be the only way to destroy all the celestial bodies in the universe and there are other methods, such as the shockwaves from the clashes between two characters.
Technically there isn't such a thing as conventional explosions and shockwaves in space due to lack of air to propagate it.


Thats why when nukes explode in Vaccum of space its called EMP not bomb.....cuz ots all Electromagnetic Radiations.

:v
I am not sure. It may be best to wait for DontTalk and Ultima again.
 
Should 'For example' be placed before 'via an omnidirectional explosion'?

'Cause an explosion wouldn't be the only way to destroy all the celestial bodies in the universe and there are other methods, such as the shockwaves from the clashes between two characters.
Technically there isn't such a thing as conventional explosions and shockwaves in space due to lack of air to propagate it.


Thats why when nukes explode in Vaccum of space its called EMP not bomb.....cuz ots all Electromagnetic Radiations.

:v
While technically incorrect I believe "explosion" makes it easier to understand for users than something like "Omnidirectional release of an energy wave" or something of such nature.
Maybe one could say "via an omnidirectional explosion or similar"?
 
While technically correct I believe "explosion" makes it easier to understand for users than something like "Omnidirectional release of an energy wave" or something of such nature.
Maybe one could say "via an omnidirectional explosion or similar"?
No, I just mean that it would be better for:

"(Whatever came before) For example via an omnidirectional explosion, etcetera."

Since an omnidirectional explosion would just be an example that we're placing on the description.

Edit: I'm also fine with not adding it.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for helping out DontTalk. I don't want to mess with the tiering system page on my own without input.
 
I am not sure what you want the new thread to be about, or if there is anything left to do here.
 
Please repeat yourself with a summary then.
 
I want to make a part 2 to this thread regarding the alternate dimension stuff. Just to keep things organized because I feel like things went a bit off track.
This is what i was talking about. We got the universal destruction out of the way so now it's time to talk about the alternate dimensions. This would need a new thread so more people can read it easily.
 
Okay. That is probably fine then.
 
No problem. Link to the new thread here please.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top