Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
common Tllmbrg WThe other verses are just bad
Sun feat is wrongIgnoring the shitstorm that went by, what's the consensus here so far?
Sun feat is wrongIgnoring the shitstorm that went by, what's the consensus here so far?
What's the problem with scaling mtt to his own 5 legs?
- MTT's feat should scale to all 5 legs or just one.
The speed of lightning is not constant for sure. But. More powerful lightning doesn't necessarily mean faster speed.
- MHS+ has the minimum AP necessary to scale to real life lightning.
One leg deals moderate Damage to frisk, and of MTT's attacks follow suitWhat's the problem with scaling mtt to his own 5 legs?
We could just give mtt the Lord Boros' ship treatmentOne leg deals moderate Damage to frisk, and of MTT's attacks follow suit
It would be self-contradictory
I don't think that AP is the issue with the lightning calc.Sun feat is wrong
Mettaton EX leg feat has incorrect pixelscaling originally
What we currently need to discuss is:
- MTT's feat should scale to all 5 legs or just one.
- MHS+ has the minimum AP necessary to scale to real life lightning.
Vague cloudlike sprite? That's a very literal cloud sprite.Lightning shouldn't be considered cloud-to-ground because it has a vaguely cloud-like sprite
Real clouds don't have smiley faces.Vague cloudlike sprite? That's a very literal cloud sprite.
Undertale has an already established and accepted case where magic is accepted to mimick real life elements to perfection, though. How would you acknowledge that?I don't think that AP is the issue with the lightning calc.
I think the issue is that the cloud is half a meter across, shoots lightning for a few meters, and the "lightning" that it shoots behaves nothing at all like real lightning.
Lightning shouldn't be considered cloud-to-ground because it has a vaguely cloud-like sprite and appropriate AP.
Mimicking some things well =/= literally every single attack is exactly the same as our association with the object IRL, no matter how many aspects of it indicate otherwise.Undertale has an already established and accepted case where magic is accepted to mimick real life elements to perfection, though. How would you acknowledge that?
Mimicking some things well =/= literally every single attack is exactly the same as our association with the object IRL, no matter how many aspects of it indicate otherwise.
I don't think they all need to land in the same bucket. And if you decide that we do, then there's more cases where they don't match up (this cloud/lightning feat, the sun also discussed in this thread, the dog's bark literally being shaped as the text BARK, bombs exploding in four directions) than there are cases where they do match up (fire, bones) and for both of those it's only barely, considering that fire IRL does not come in little orbs, and both fire and bones don't disappear when you touch them..
I am not trying to remove the acceptance of the fire/bone/sound attacks. I'm just pointing out that we shouldn't group them all together as 100% matching up IRL, when things indicate otherwise.
I also think it's nonsensical to consider them matching IRL when they visually are completely different, and contextually, would make no sense acting as they do IRL. Vulkin was not making clouds 2km tall, and 4km wide underneath a mountain, in a region where water evaporates instantly.
WellI think the easier argument, with our current standards, is to say that it's at the very least not cloud-to-ground lightning.
I also think that unrealistic electricity shouldn't be given Supersonic speeds, but it seems like that isn't how our standards operate right now.
I don't think that AP is the issue with the lightning calc.
I think the issue is that the cloud is half a meter across, shoots lightning for a few meters, and the "lightning" that it shoots behaves nothing at all like real lightning.
Lightning shouldn't be considered cloud-to-ground because it has a vaguely cloud-like sprite and appropriate AP.
Mimicking some things well =/= literally every single attack is exactly the same as our association with the object IRL, no matter how many aspects of it indicate otherwise.
I don't think they all need to land in the same bucket. And if you decide that we do, then there's more cases where they don't match up (this cloud/lightning feat, the sun also discussed in this thread, the dog's bark literally being shaped as the text BARK, bombs exploding in four directions) than there are cases where they do match up (fire, bones) and for both of those it's only barely, considering that fire IRL does not come in little orbs, and both fire and bones don't disappear when you touch them..
I am not trying to remove the acceptance of the fire/bone/sound attacks. I'm just pointing out that we shouldn't group them all together as 100% matching up IRL, when things indicate otherwise.
I also think it's nonsensical to consider them matching IRL when they visually are completely different, and contextually, would make no sense acting as they do IRL. Vulkin was not making clouds 2km tall, and 4km wide underneath a mountain, in a region where water evaporates instantly.
Real clouds don't have smiley faces.
Since at least two staff agreed with each thing, can I apply this?
wdym? Another MHS+ rating? Is it also based on assuming cloud-to-ground lightning?Should we revert to the older version of the MHS+ calculations by default?
Pretty sure Content Mods cannot actually agree to CRT stuffI won't apply the changes now
They can. It's just that thread moderators hold more weight in their decisionsPretty sure Content Mods cannot actually agree to CRT stuff
No they cannot.They can. It's just that thread moderators hold more weight in their decisions
Yes. We only have...0 lolUndertale is a pretty controversial verse, no?
Think that requires 3 Staff Agreement
I won't apply the changes now
Turns out the results of MTT's thread is
crucial
to basically the entire god tier scaling. So it's best to NOT have to edit that blog twice.
ISL: (0.8932/(1.3927×10^9))^5×5.693e41 = 0.0000617727418 Joules (Below Average Human)Question, taking the AP the sun should generating in energy and converting toget the amount of energy It would generate if was the size of knight knight star would make sense?
You mean the Supersonic+/Hypersonic values right?Should we revert to the older version of the MHS+ calculations by default?
Alright I'm back.
You mean the Supersonic+/Hypersonic values right?
By the way, I calculated Frisk's speed at Supersonic+ comparing them to the meteors, still slower than Tsunderplane's calc.
2000m/s instead of 1718m/s is basically nothingShouldn't we use the ablation speeds on the Calculations page for Knight Knight's meteors? Why are we using the Mach 5 value?
2000m/s instead of 1718m/s is basically nothing
AND, the meteor isn't big enough for this to be considered. This is a meteoroid,