a) You have provided neither so i dont see how this helps your case at all
b) Its literally part of the current standard profile format
When there are multiple versions of a character that are distinct enough to be split into several profiles, whether it is due to the length and complexity of the page or versions from different mediums, then the multiple pages that are created as a result of this have to be linked by a tabber...
vsbattles.fandom.com
And? The standard format has no reason to say anything different, as that's what we are using for all future profiles. The rules still are clear about the fact that old profiles are fine. That's what the thread and the official decision said. (and what the actual editing rules indirectly indicate by mentioning that only new profiles without references are up for deletion) It's also what was the spirit of the rule and the decision of the debate.
So yeah, your stance is wrong. Our wikis official stance is different.
Without scans proving that they are correct the only thing anyone has to go on is your word, which means very little in regards to an obscure verse that very few people have even heard of or can get access to.
Which would be a valid reason for deletion if I weren't around to give evidence. Luckily, I am. So it is an entirely moot point. Again, the profiles are within our standards.
Youre effectively designing your profiles to be debated on the basis of 'The profile is correct because i said its correct and youre not able to prove otherwise because you dont have the scans'.
If it were just possible to ask for scans form someone able to provide them... oh wait, it is!
Aight smartass lemme explain something to you, alot of those profiles come from different verses, verses which i am in fact in the process of cleaning up, but unlike you who just makes massive edits to profiles with no repercussions (Ive seen how often you just add random shit to pages like Vandalieu without CRTs)
? I think I added more explanations some time ago. Don't believe I'm in the habit of adding stats or abilities without a CRT.
I follow the rules of the wiki and make CRTs. And also unlike you, I acknowledge that my profiles are out of date and need updating and am currently working on updating all of them. Maybe if you put as much effort into maintaining your profiles as you did explaining why you dont need to maintain your profiles, we wouldnt be having these issues.
I make CRTs.
Make giant blogs with countless of quotes just for them. Sadly, I also have staff duties as well. Literally have 68 requests right now to evaluate side rules and verses I don't care about. I would also much rather work on my own verses, but the priorities are (for the most part) staff duties > making profiles correct > references and other stuff.
I have literally dozens of upgrades on the backburner. I have quote blogs on my PC I regularly update in case I someday get the time to actually make a CRT out of them. Do you really think I wouldn't be doing those if I had freetime to handle such stuff?
So yeah, if you are managing cleaning up your old profiles faster than me, congratulations. You got more time for it than I do.
Neither does it change the fact that the site standards allow the profiles in their current states nor that it's hypocritical to call me out while having so many unsourced profiles. (it's not like you called me out about adding references slower than you...)
Also, I acknowledge that the profiles should get references (although not necessarily scans). I just don't acknowledge that it is our standard or that I have any obligation to do it now or anytime in the very near future for that matter. I.e. I don't consider your complains about me not having done so yet valid and find them, quite frankly, rude.
Cool, thats like saying the Hunter has BFR into another plane of reality because he can theoretically use the tonsil stone to lure an opponent into an Amygdala's portal trap
Yeah, that analogy is completely lost on me.
