Tier 2 requirements and examples - Part 2

[PrinceofPein]

As usual, I nearly completely trust DontTalk's sense of judgement, but can somebody please remind me about what he would like to do here exactly before we apply them? I have been preparing extensively for my trip abroad for the last 10 days.

Forgot about this, DT already did all he needs to, all that is left is the page been applied

 

[Theglassman12]

Like I said I’m fine with the more explanatory version of the universe page, so we can just use that.

 

[Antvasima]

As usual, I nearly completely trust DontTalk's sense of judgement, but can somebody please remind me about what he would like to do here exactly before we apply them? I have been preparing extensively for my trip abroad for the last 10 days.

Forgot about this, DT already did all he needs to, all that is left is the page been applied

@DontTalkDT

Are you willing to help out here please?

 

[KLOL506]

Bump

@DontTalkDT

 

[DontTalkDT]

(I have edited the blog to Version 2 by popular preference)

As usual, I nearly completely trust DontTalk's sense of judgement, but can somebody please remind me about what he would like to do here exactly before we apply them? I have been preparing extensively for my trip abroad for the last 10 days.

I intend to apply this sandbox to this page.
It mostly extends upon what we already put in the Tiering System FAQ.

 

[PrinceofPein]

(I have edited the blog to Version 2 by popular preference)

I intend to apply this sandbox to this page.
It mostly extends upon what we already put in the Tiering System FAQ.

Looks good to me, you can go ahead

 

[KLOL506]

(I have edited the blog to Version 2 by popular preference)

I intend to apply this sandbox to this page.
It mostly extends upon what we already put in the Tiering System FAQ.

@Planck69 @Theglassman12 @GilverTheProtoAngelo This look good to you brothers?

 

[Theglassman12]

It looks fine to me.

 

[Planck69]

Looks good.

 

[GilverTheProtoAngelo]

@KLOL506
Makes sense to me

 

[KLOL506]

That's that then.

 

[ImmortalDread]

(I have edited the blog to Version 2 by popular preference)

I intend to apply this sandbox to this page.
It mostly extends upon what we already put in the Tiering System FAQ.

You are the best, I agree with the changes

 

[DontTalkDT]

I made the edit.
Any last minute topics or are we done here?

 

[Theglassman12]

That should do it imo

 

[Bobsican]

For consistency with what the Tiering System says, this

* Only acts of direct destruction or creation are considered valid for ranking purposes. Destroying the universe at the beginning of time, resulting in the subsequent fading away of timelines due to causality paradoxes, does not meet the criteria for classification. In such cases, it is important to determine that the destruction of multiple branching timelines is not achieved simply by destroying one timeline, leading to the others being erased as a consequence of their interrelated past being destroyed. This evaluation is done on an individual basis and depends on factors such as the nature and representation of the destructive actions. Additionally, for ranking creation feats, further considerations must be taken into account according to [[Creation Feats|this page]].

...should also mention this bit somewhere (and thus reworded too):

"Significantly affect" is here used as an umbrella term for feats that don't involve direct creation or destruction but are comparable to them in power, such as warping and distorting the entirety of the structure in question, sustaining its existence with one's own, merging the structure with another one, etc.

As we may remember, tier 2 feats or above aren't exclusively relegated to direct creation or destruction.

 

[PrinceofPein]

I made the edit.
Any last minute topics or are we done here?

Well the revision is done, now it remains the profiles, I have been making a little list, but it is really hard so that may take a bit longer but I will speed it up.
A few verses at a time so we can call the supporters so the thread do not turn into something that is rowdy

For consistency with what the Tiering System says, this




...should also mention this bit somewhere (and thus reworded too):



As we may remember, tier 2 feats or above aren't exclusively relegated to direct creation or destruction.

And we can also add his suggestion

 

[PrinceofPein]

Bump, so we can move to the next thing

 

[KLOL506]

For consistency with what the Tiering System says, this




...should also mention this bit somewhere (and thus reworded too):



As we may remember, tier 2 feats or above aren't exclusively relegated to direct creation or destruction.

@DontTalkDT

 

[DontTalkDT]

For consistency with what the Tiering System says, this




...should also mention this bit somewhere (and thus reworded too):



As we may remember, tier 2 feats or above aren't exclusively relegated to direct creation or destruction.

Would changing it to

Only acts of direct destruction, creation or significantly affecting (in the sense explained in the Tiering System) are considered valid for ranking purposes.

be enough?

 

[Bobsican]

That'd work.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Works for me but I would change ranking to "tiering"

 

[PrinceofPein]

Would changing it to

be enough?

yeah, I also want to ask, will you be able to help in the follow up thread?

 

[KLOL506]

Works for me but I would change ranking to "tiering"

@DontTalkDT

 

[DontTalkDT]

Alright, I adjust the sentence accordingly.

yeah, I also want to ask, will you be able to help in the follow up thread?

Which follow up thread?

 

[PrinceofPein]

Alright, I adjust the sentence accordingly.

Which follow up thread?

There are a few verses which are affected by this, so the plan is to work with the supporters to fix it

 

[Omegabronic]

There are a few verses which are affected by this, so the plan is to work with the supporters to fix it

do you have an idea of how much and which?

 

[DontTalkDT]

There are a few verses which are affected by this, so the plan is to work with the supporters to fix it

Are there so many that it requires a general thread? If it's just 2 or 3 it might be better to make a CRT for each one.

 

[Omegabronic]

I feel like it should be done one by one regardless, it will become a mess if it is various verses at once

 

[PrinceofPein]

Are there so many that it requires a general thread? If it's just 2 or 3 it might be better to make a CRT for each one.

it is a bit more than that, I will compile a list and send it next week.

 

[KLOL506]

Yeah, can't tackle it all at once. Best to do it one by one.

 

[Antvasima]

Big thanks to everybody who have helped out in this thread.

So what, if anything, is currently left to do here?

 

[PrinceofPein]

Big thanks to everybody who have helped out in this thread.

So what, if anything, is currently left to do here?

By the end of the week, I will list the verses affected by this revision, then we can see how we will go about revising them

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thank you for helping out.

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

By the end of the week, I will list the verses affected by this revision, then we can see how we will go about revising them

Bump, progress?

 

[PrinceofPein]

Bump, progress?

Bad, it is harder than it looks, I have to be absolutely sure and go through a lot of materials to be sure that the verses are actually affected so as not to bother the supporters unnecessarily, as that can be annoying, I am like 25% done

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you very much for helping out.

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

Bump.

 

[Reiner04]

Is it done as of yet?

 

[ImmortalDread]

This thread should probably be closed as the main premise of OP is concluded and applied.
Any further progress is simply optional and not subsumed by the original premise.

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

This thread should probably be closed as the main premise of OP is concluded and applied.
Any further progress is simply optional and not subsumed by the original premise.

I'll ask for closure then lol