Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I could do that.Hmmm... if I may suggest a little reformulation: Instead of "bomb" we should probably use something like "explosion source", since explosions in fictions could also be caused by spells and stuff.
I did some more minor edits. I hope you don't mind them.I could do that.
If it's point-blank by our current definition, then still that way. If it isn't then in the way the page specifies for not point-blank explosions.How would one go about calculating for our previous description of "point-blank"?
Basically if the explosion happens inside of you, or you cover it with your body fully, or you just so manage to end up having it explode in your face, right under your feet or where you are sitting/crouching and the bomb isn't the size of a big nuke (As in, smaller than your body, like say, the size of a small gunpowder barrel or a grenade or somesuch, if it's like, as big as IRL nukes then the shelling might put the real explosive a bit farther than your body), then you scale to the full yield. You'd need to be at least 0.23-ish meters away from the bomb to scale to its full yield.How would one go about calculating for our previous description of "point-blank"?
Thank you.I did some more minor edits. I hope you don't mind them.
That'd prolly break the inverse square law formula assuming you go with 0.68 m^2 average human cross-sectional area. Max limit for the formula to work is 23.26232201 cm (That's the distance I found where one would scale to the full yield using average human Cross-sectional area assuming that's how far they were from the bomb/explosion source). If your cross-section is bigger (And it definitely will be for a lot of characters that weigh more than 62 kg and measure well above 5ft 9in), then the explosion would need to be a tiny bit farther away from the explosion for it to remain valid before the math completely breaks down.By previous definition I mean "character is like, 20 cm away from the explosion"
Pretty much.Oh, so nothing changed
Sure, no problem, I'll ask some experts around the neighborhood.Well I know nothing about the Simpsons so I'm gonna unfollow this, however yall don't forget to check the abilities, Butters was very generous with handing them out.
Well, I've seen a few serious profiles where characters recover from getting squished. I doubt it's toon force in those cases.Getting squished can also be considered Toon Force
But usually, toon force squish has them looking like a pancake or something, while in the mill we hear bones crack and break.Getting squished can also be considered Toon Force
Yeah, Subsonic+ travel speed with Supersonic Combat Speed and Reactions should be fine.something I also want to talk about is speed supersonic should really be in reactions and subsonic + in traveling speed I'm gonna make some calcs for some of these feats
This statement just reminds me of another thing about our current Simpsons profilesYeah, Subsonic+ travel speed with Supersonic Combat Speed and Reactions should be fine.
This statement just reminds me of another thing about our current Simpsons profiles
Just the fact we're talking about a comedy show with well over 20 years of runtime as if these ratings are actually consistent across it
To quote what I believe was Jaften
"Remember the episode where Lisa broke the sound barrier and oneshot a tank?"
Of course that's going to take a bit more research than I'm willing to put in my far but, I'm just saying it's more than a matter of bad calcs.
Lisa broke the sound barrier and one-shot a tank
Around the speed of sound if crackedanyone know how fast a whip is?
That's for the loop, the tip of the whip travels twice as fast.Around the speed of sound if cracked
Can you give me the video link?aight I have a calc coming out for lenny dodging a whip might take me a bit to put it on my blog since I can't access it rn
Thanks, figured it out.I used something called pixlr on my browser and screwed with the second layer image layer and found what I wanted I forgot what it was on there
Maybe the newer Simpsons, but older-gen Simpsons had decent 9-A feats to 8-C feats for sure.Honestly even if you found 9-A and higher feats, aren't they just outliers? They're consistently approx. 9-B at best.