- 42
- 7
In general, is High 1-A (+) also a thing? I thought [+] modifier could only be added in Tier 1-A. But maybe that’s just my misunderstanding.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats probably where the revision will be able to discuss these items in length. I understand there’s a discussion in the works?The Axiom is said to be able to be surpassed and could also be perceived. Doubt tier 0 would work at all.
High 1-A+ is a thing. The highest in the system is something that contains all possibilities and concepts.In general, is High 1-A (+) also a thing? I thought [+] modifier could only be added in Tier 1-A. But maybe that’s just my misunderstanding.
Based on their current profile, they likely aren't going to have any changes from this.seriosly,where does the bakery scale?
Cause she's beyond the extension of r>f layers of the witch domain, to the point that for her there's no difference between it and the human domain.Could you elaborate on why? Also, some guy claimed Eua isn't Featherine. Any thoughts on that regard?
Based on their current profile, they likely aren't going to have any changes from this.
someone wanted to make a revision in 2022 to 1-A,the problem was,it wasBased on their current profile, they likely aren't going to have any changes from this.
yes,it is (and also it was poorly made)and current profile is extremely outdated
1-A would actually probably start earlier tbhI don't see why SMT would have any changes from this.
Seems good.Cause she's beyond the extension of r>f layers of the witch domain, to the point that for her there's no difference between it and the human domain.
Also, Eua very likely is Featherine at some point in the past. Higu Mei pretty much aludes to this based on calling her the strongest witch or the closest to omnipotence and stuff.
Yeah, but that's because of "beyond dimensions" stuff, not R > F.1-A would actually probably start earlier tbh
Yep.is it a R>F anti feat if : Beings from lower levels of existence interacts with higher levels of existence via advanced technology?
Hope everyone having a good day!
I think it fits the Ultima's definition of reality-fiction, but since it won't be used, it doesn't really matter.I don't really think that's how R>F is being treated here in conjunction with the new system vision of R>F.
So does Featherine's part count as well or do we still accept her having R>F?Yep.
Also a massive anti-feat to Reality-Fiction relationship.what about going to a real world,where it sees your world has a videogame
why?Also a massive anti-feat to Reality-Fiction relationship.
Anti-feat unless it's got some very specific context. In general, a being from the "fictional" world shouldn't be able to exert any effect on the higher world using other fictional things, and that includes their power. (Unless that power is sourced from a higher world, or is in a higher world, or something)what about going to a real world,where it sees your world has a videogame
Wouldn't this downgrade the Elder Scrolls then, since the highest level of the verse is transcending the dream and taking control of it?Any "Reality-Fiction relationship" where the "fiction" interacts with the "reality" by itself or with technology, powers, or forces from their "fictional" world; whether it be travelling to it, ascending to it, manipulating it, threatening to destroy, using it to rewrite your "fictional world", or anything else, is a massive anti-feat that almost definitely guarantees it won't be considered a true Reality-Fiction relationship.
Attaining Amaranth is moreso dissolving yourself back into the Godhead, so, less "accessing" a higher level through your own physicality (Which is the problematic part) and moreso shedding all your attributes to realize what you always were at the core.Wouldn't this downgrade the Elder Scrolls then, since the highest level of the verse is transcending the dream and taking control of it?
If he intended to veto the thread from the start, he wouldn't have called a vote.Because I am not looking forward to them just vetoing the entire thread or flat-out stalling.
Not if it's a case where they are part of the dream and what is happening is they are dissolving their illusionary fictional existence to fully become one with the dream.Wouldn't this downgrade the Elder Scrolls then, since the highest level of the verse is transcending the dream and taking control of it?
how specific?because it is not like a fictional world on itself,it is just a world that was created by the ''real world''in the cosmology of the verse,worlds are created using a trascendental programming that allows all possible things to happen according to the programming,even if they sound contradictory.Anti-feat unless it's got some very specific context. In general, a being from the "fictional" world shouldn't be able to exert any effect on the higher world using other fictional things, and that includes their power. (Unless that power is sourced from a higher world, or is in a higher world, or something)
Fair enough, but nothing says he won't stall.If he intended to veto the thread from the start, he wouldn't have called a vote.
I'll wait.Fair enough, but nothing says he won't stall.
Hello ultima I needed to ask this from youIf he intended to veto the thread from the start, he wouldn't have called a vote.
The first: No. The second: That album is 404'd.
Would need to see specific scans, but if the thing from the fictional world somehow breaks through into the real world on its own, that is in fact an anti-feat.how specific?because it is not like a fictional world on itself,it is just a world that was created by the ''real world''in the cosmology of the verse,worlds are created using a trascendental programming that allows all possible things to happen according to the programming,even if they sound contradictory.
so this real world,created the ''videogame''using that trascendental programming
Yeah. Unless there's in-verse factors remediating that. I've already talked a bit here about how ascending to higher and lower layers can be coherent depending on how the verse's cosmology works.Hello ultima I needed to ask this from you
is interaction with higher levels of existence via advanced technology considered anti feat for R>F?
okWould need to see specific scans, but if the thing from the fictional world somehow breaks through into the real world on its own, that is in fact an anti-feat.
There's also more esoteric stuff, like the first two cases here, for instance.You can only interact with reality as fiction if A) a resident of that reality or a higher reality helps, or B) the body and world is fictional but their soul/heart/true self/whatever originates from a higher reality and that is what is used. Otherwise it's an anti-feat.
Basically, fiction can't interact with reality, only reality acting under the guise of fiction can interact with reality.
The first is just Scoria talking about how Yahweh doesn't seem to care about anyone or anything other than Lucifer and Michael. Second is just Lucifer using "author/character" poetically to distinguish between "Creator/Ruler" and "Creation/Subject." Third is... nothing, really.
That's the point. Creation is like a game/book/fiction that God(position) plays with. None of it matters, affects, or changes him unless he wants to interact with them directly which can't work as he can only with aspects or lower emanations.The first is just Scoria talking about how Yahweh doesn't seem to care about anyone or anything other than Lucifer and Michael. Second is just Lucifer using "author/character" poetically to distinguish between "Creator/Ruler" and "Creation/Subject." Third is... nothing, really.
Would it still be 1-A due to superiority over Creation thus time, space, causality, and dimensions? Strictly talking about the City and not the residents other than the Primum Mobile, Lucifer, and Michael.The fourth is just saying the Silver City is outside creation and can observe the universe from that vantage point, which likewise is pretty bad evidence.