Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not Low 1-C at all, even assuming creation is actually 2-A to begin with.How about low 1C where buddha held all of creation in his palm
OK. First, post the quotes that show these places are universal space-times. Even then, that's just a higher level of 2-A. He'd need to see it as non-existent.It is when it includes heaven , mortal realm, the inumerable and various space times which is held as a small disk in buddha's palm
Scan?He viewed it all as a page while his non-existent self existed beyond linear space time and viewed it all as a page in his palm
No, it isn't. Even the page part requires him to view the world as the written contents of that page, not the physical page itself since that's just a size difference at that point.And isn't a small disk similar to a page from a book to begin with?
A damage beyond nonexistence. It ain't that deep fam.Mind showing the damage they regenerate from? Because harming their physical bodies, souls, or any other form of thing would not work with them being nothing. You either argue its just inconsistency, or that their bodies aren't their full selves and that recovering those would be akin to an abstract recovering their avatars.
Prove they're flowery language or concede.Those absolutely reek of flowery language, so the context in which they were used is rather important.
Sand in the Ganges is actually used as a measurement of Infinity in Buddhism, specifically, the Diamond sutra uses it a lot when talking about treasures and merit."the dragon place,and worlds as vast as Ganges' sands"
so infinite=number of sand particles in the Ganges river?
Who said it was a feat? Logical conclusion can easily fulfil any requirement, if you disagree that any logical conclusion can then your argument defeats itself."Infinite power" statements actually being used as proof for High 3-A is especially sad. And again, a feat of regen or nada. No "logical extrapolation", just a feat.
that just implies that the infinity was hyperbolicSand in the Ganges is actually used as a measurement of Infinity in Buddhism, specifically, the Diamond sutra uses it a lot when talking about treasures and merit.
Saying that they will gain as much merit by reading the Diamond Sutra as there are sand in the Ganges and then later say it's an infinite or immeasurable amount of merit.