Summer Time Rendering: Possible 6-D cosmology revision

[Wikisource]

Your reasoning can have other possible interpretation without needing to rely on the existence of Hypertimeline.

What are they?

We can't just assume the highest interpretation for things

furthermore, there being a record for an erased timeline doesn't mean that the recorder is infinitely expanding. That's what you need to prove for a hyper-timeline to be valid in the first place
because it is also possible for a hyper timeline to only possess several snapshots of different timelines especially when there is nothing that proves the hypertime in this case is infinite and functions perpendicularly and like a timeline that makes it extends infinitely into the future and functions like a time and not just a recorder

Being able to travel to erased time cannot prove that alone

First, I have provided a hypertimeline base on higher dimension, which was mentioned in ch 62. If there are anything unclear, I can explain it again to you. Secondly, there are infinite timelines (was explained in blog), all of them are recorded too so at least hypertimeline can be infinity and bigger. Third, about "orthogonality", all timelines has been serviced by its own time dimension, then the overarching timeline is automatically considered orthogonal. In STR, all timelines under the higher dimension and both was recorded by it.

Is orthogonality a requirement? Yes, but not in the sense that it's required evidence. If a substantial space-time continuum under an overarching timeline is recognized as being serviced by its own time dimension, then the overarching timeline is automatically considered orthogonal: hence why the wording for the temporal dimension standards was revised compared to the citation above. A statement for the overarching timeline being orthogonal is all in all: supporting or alternative evidence, but not required evidence if a lesser space-time is already recognized as harboring a self-contained temporal dimension.

 

[Wikisource]

I will say something about "orthogonality" after wake up, now I need go to bed.

 

[Wikisource]

Bump

 

[Fallen_Angelicx]

Bump. This is sad...

 

[Wikisource]

Bump. This is sad...

 

[Wikisource]

Ahhhh, bump...

 

[Robo432343]

agree with 5-D

 

[Wikisource]

Bump

 

[Fallen_Angelicx]

Bump (Might aswell 5-D be concluded cuz no mod showing up and staying to continue)

 

[Wikisource]

Bump (Might aswell 5-D be concluded cuz no mod showing up and staying to continue)

Bump, ic

 

[Wikisource]

Bump

 

[Wikisource]

Ig this crt really cooked
Bump

 

[Sir_Ovens]

The cosmology blog makes sense to me.

 

[Wikisource]

If the manga pages accurately depict how a timeline is "destroyed," then I am leaning against the need for a hypertimeline for the different timeline travels proposed.

Sorry but can we continue?

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Looks alright.

 

[Fallen_Angelicx]

Looks alright.

Finally a mod comment!!

 

[Sir_Ovens]

Finally a mod comment!!

I guess my vote doesn't count then.

 

[Elizhaa]

The proposals look fine.

 

[Fallen_Angelicx]

I guess my vote doesn't count then.

Oopp my badd... Ovens Thanks for your help with this crt

 

[Fallen_Angelicx]

So 6-D is accepted now I'm guessing?

 

[Wikisource]

So 6-D is accepted now I'm guessing?

Yeah.

 

[Wikisource]

Change applied, this crt could be close rn.