- 12,300
- 11,259
I'm cool with that.Would my earlier suggestion of ‘7-B, possibly 7-A+’ work for Elder Centipede?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm cool with that.Would my earlier suggestion of ‘7-B, possibly 7-A+’ work for Elder Centipede?
Maybe. I'd lean towards more to all of them having possibly higher, as stated prior, but this could workWould my earlier suggestion of ‘7-B, possibly 7-A+’ work for Elder Centipede?
Seems alright.Would my earlier suggestion of ‘7-B, possibly 7-A+’ work for Elder Centipede?
I have no idea.Isn't beefcake getting a revision? I heard he was getting some re-calcs iirc
Either that or "possibly higher".Would my earlier suggestion of ‘7-B, possibly 7-A+’ work for Elder Centipede?
Mkay. I think ‘possibly 7-A+‘ would make more sense since either way, it would be scaling above Gouketsu. I feel like leaving it to ‘possibly higher’ would just make people question why he isn’t 7-A+.Either that or "possibly higher".
He should probably be upgraded.sliiides ‘Tank Top Master speed upgrade?’ here again
Bruh. You want these best girl upgrades bad lolWhat if next chapter, Tatsumaki throws the spear so hard that she pierces through the entire Earth?!
What if next chapter, Tatsumaki throws the spear so hard that she pierces through the entire Earth?!
Bruh. You want these best girl upgrades bad lol
Or even better, she just casually drops a 5-B statement
2nd best girl
Who did you say was 1st again?
She just throws the Moon at someone.
There's an argument to be had about what is meant by "powerful". EC and Rover aren't the most offensively powerful high dragons but they have very impressive durability. I would recommend upgrading EC's and Rover's durability to 7-A, but having their overall tier be: "7-B, possibly higher", since their durability is their best aspect and what would most likely scale to Gouketsu. Unless Fuhrer Ugly or Gums surprises us with a 7-A feat, of course.The issue is that besides Orochi no one shows a comparable feat to Goketsu. Based on hype and showings the only one that might scale is EC. The rest are demonstrably worse or with Rover would only maybe scale in one area.
There is a statement that there are multiple monsters in the MA are just as strong as he is.The only confirmed scaling we have to Goketsu is Orochi. The only other people that could be valid (Rover and Elder Centipede) have no evidence of actually scaling to Goketsu and in Rover's case has a decent chunk of AP anti-feats to suggest he doesn't scale at all.
Well, we know that there are monsters as strong as Gouketsu in the MA, just not who those monsters are. If any monsters do get 7-A feats that do not surpass Gouketsu's, I think it will be fair to scale them to him. That of course is speculative and may not happen. I do think that his statement justifies a "possibly higher" for the strongest MA cadres though.I still don't think we should be scaling anyone besides Orochi to Gouketsu.
It is too speculative.
There is a statement that there are multiple monsters in the MA are just as strong as he is.
No it's in the Season 2 Compus Guide. It states that there are many monsters "just as strong as Gouketsu" in the Monster Association.Is this the statement you mean?
Here's a link to the reddit thread for the guide book:
That's referencing the exact page I posted, no?.Here, it's this statement on page 38:
"He (Gouketsu) declared that there are more monsters within the association that are easily as strong as him"
Answer this, plsI've already said my opinion on who best girl is, and I think @ZoroNotZolo and @LordTracer have as well, so I want to know who everyone else thinks is best girl.
No, it wouldn't seem that way. The manga statement is talking about the existence of multiple monsters stronger than Bakuzan, this statement is claiming that there are "more monsters as strong as Gouketsu"- it must be referencing the anime or just adding a new statement in there.That's referencing the exact page I posted, no?.
If it is referencing something potentially non-canon then it becomes a lot more questionable to scaling the monsters based on that.No, it wouldn't seem that way. The manga statement is talking about the existence of multiple monsters stronger than Bakuzan, this statement is claiming that there are "more monsters as strong as Gouketsu"- it must be referencing the anime or just adding a new statement in there.
It was said earlier in the thread that the stuff in the anime guidebooks was said and approved by ONE and Murata, so I think it should be taken as canon especially since the anime and OVA's were looked over and approved by ONE and Murata (which was also shown earlier in the thread).If it is referencing something potentially non-canon then it becomes a lot more questionable to scaling the monsters based on that.
They did go to the trouble of interviewing ONE for the guidebook and they've included the original sketches ONE made for the OVAs as well, making these guidebooks canon in part. Did they say ONE had approved all the statements within the guidebook?It was said earlier in the thread that the stuff in the anime guidebooks was said and approved by ONE and Murata, so I think it should be taken as canon especially since the anime and OVA's were looked over and approved by ONE and Murata (which was also shown earlier in the thread).
I thought that was the case. I could be wrong.They did go to the trouble of interviewing ONE for the guidebook and they've included the original sketches ONE made for the OVAs as well, making these guidebooks canon in part. Did they say ONE had approved all the statements within the guidebook?