• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I hope one day we get the rundown of how much a hero makes monthly. When Saitama was B-Rank he was still broke. (Granted the enitre series goes by so quickly he might have received like 1 B-Class pay before getting promoted. If even that, lol.)
 
HA makes a lot of bank out of them and their image, But the pay is quite mediocre considering how much they could make using their physicals anywhere else.
It's a nice estimative.
 
Question, do these wiki treat the zero punch as undodgeble without immeasurable speed?
Yes. I mean the statement and the feat is clear, no?
There was a CRT like that in the past and it got rejected. The argument was that it is just a metaphor.

Edit: The CRT.
When this fight ends, we are going to discuss the dimensional slash speed
A good odd is that it will just be whatever Void's attack speed is, meaning nothing changes much. We probably don't even get MFTL+. Though, we know it is much faster than Blast can dodge by foot.
 
The thread wanted to establish that it was immeasurable speed, which is wrong.

It is punching while travelling back in time, which I think would require immeasurable speed to evade as the attack itself comes from the future

To put it simple: Saitama starts time travelling using what Garou taught him. Then, while travelling back in time, he decides when to stop by punching. If said punch is directed to someone, then he punches from that time travelling state and hits the being. It is causality reversal because the attack was thrown when travelling back, i.e., the cause (Saitama throwing a punch) comes after the effect (the punch connecting), and is unavoidable because of that: you cannot evade something that hits you before it is even landed.

Consequently, all speeds up to infinite should not be able to evade it, as what the perceive is the consequence of the attack: them getting punched, not the cause of the attack (Saitama landing a punch). That is why it should require immeasurable speed to evade, imo
 
Unless I missed something from that thread, no

It'd be dumb not to treat an attack that is stated to be undodgeable due to causality reversal… as undodgeable due to causality reversal lol
 
"The argument was that it is just a metaphor." wait this got accepted? or it was accepted that it was undodgeable?
The thread wanted to establish that it was immeasurable speed, which is wrong.
It was rejected not accepted. It is even against the notion that you need immeasurable speed to dodge it rather than just being faster than the punch. It was like Saitama appeared next to Garou and threw the punch.
 
It was rejected not accepted. It is even against the notion that you need immeasurable speed to dodge it rather than just being faster than the punch. It was like Saitama appeared next to Garou and threw the punch.
It's not immeasurable speed but i don't remember anything about "being undodgeable" getting rejected? couldn't find a thread about it as well.
 
It's not immeasurable speed but i don't remember anything about "being undodgeable" getting rejected? couldn't find a thread about it as well.
Why do you think it's undodgeable then. What's stopping someone 100 times faster than Saitama dodging it?
 
Why do you think it's undodgeable. What's stopping someone 100 times faster than Saitama dodging it?
The fact that the punch did hit before it was landed.

Saitama was travelling back in time when he threw the punch. If we use a time graph to show it:

t=10 – Saitama starts to travel back in time
t=9 – Saitama is travelling back in time. Consequently, the time goes backwards
t=8

t=1 – Saitama throws a punch to Garou
t=0 – The punch connects to Garou

The punch connecting happens before the punch being thrown, thus reversing causality (as common causality follows cause being before effect) and being unavoidable. One being 100 times could not evade said punch, because he wouldn't perceive the punch coming, as the hit happens before the punch's throw.

You could think of it as something similar to Gae Bolg's ability from fate, in which the effect (Gae Bolg piercing someone's heart) is written before the cause of the attack.

That does, indeed, need immeasurable speed to be avoided (or be a Servant and have so high luck you just evade something that is not thrown, lmao)
 
There was a CRT like that in the past and it got rejected. The argument was that it is just a metaphor.

Edit: The CRT.

A good odd is that it will just be whatever Void's attack speed is, meaning nothing changes much. We probably don't even get MFTL+. Though, we know it is much faster than Blast can dodge by foot.
Only Saitama will scale
 
You can bump the thread and argue there. I was just pointing the arguments presented in the thread. I'm not here to argue for or against it.
The thread argued for immeasurable speed, which it isn't.

It is throwing a punch when travelling back in time. If the CRT was about arguing that "anyone a little faster than Saitama could evade being punched" then yeah, I'd definitely argue against it
 
Can't find it d:
You can probably argue in the thread. Currently, I don't think it's accepted that Saitama time travel punch is undodgeable and requires immeasurable speed to dodge rather than simply having enough speed.
 
I mean, that is how punching while travelling backward in time works, there is no need to explicitely put it in a page or state "it is accepted". If you get punched before the punch is even thrown, it doesn't matter if you try to evade the cause, as the effect has affected you already.

If I want to evade a gun shot to avoid the damage, but the bullet already pierced me before it is even shot, then dodging it when thrown is meaningless, and avoid the bullet piercing me is impossible as it has already pierced me.
 
I mean, that is how punching while travelling backward in time works, there is no need to explicitely put it in a page or state "it is accepted". If you get punched before the punch is even thrown, it doesn't matter if you try to evade the cause, as the effect has affected you already.
It definitely needs a note if Saitama ever used it in versus battles. Because people on the thread were acting like what I said earlier. They don't think it is undodgable at all.
It was like Saitama appeared next to Garou and threw the punch.
 
Something to note about zero punch

Saitama threw the punch at this moment in chapter 166
8904941-11.jpeg

But it landed at chapter 165
8904943-60.jpeg
 
Back
Top