- 11,539
- 10,954
I mean, his hair color was already yellow in one volume
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well... Saitama did use a serious punch, so it could be ridiculously energy denseIf the Low-End is accepted it will probably be at least monatanha level via the Striking Strength method. But if the High-End is accepted the result will be High 6-A, which would make it an Outlier
That and to make sure there was no collateral damage like King suggested, he learned from the meteor and didn't want to send chunks of EC flying all across the city.Saitama used a serious punch because he was extremely angry about losing to King
EC's dura?If the Low-End is accepted it will probably be at least monatanha level via the Striking Strength method. But if the High-End is accepted the result will be High 6-A, which would make it an Outlier
The AP of the attack, EC's Dura wouldn't scale because this attack completely vaporized/pulverized himEC's dura?
ah ok, I was a little confused as to whether it was dura or the serious punchThe AP of the attack, EC's Dura wouldn't scale because this attack completely vaporized/pulverized him
35177480000 joules should be High 8-C+at 8.4 tons, unless I'm missing a 0.The real result probabily is 8-B
The debris may be on the floor of the building, it's not like it's floating around.Why use a violent fragmentation end if we don't see any visible remains of the destroyed section, surely with a situation like that it's pulverization unless we have any in-verse proof of vaporization
How do you know what a reinforced concrete building is?This calculation dont work. Saitama punch a Building. Building = Concrete Reforced
Surely if all that mass was ground into recognizeable fragments, the piles would be at least a little visible from this angleThe debris may be on the floor of the building, it's not like it's floating around.
According to what can be seen in the image, the rubble was torn off and flew away, if it were pulverization the destroyed edges should be completely clean, however you can see remains of the building there, there is not even a bit of dust to support the pulverization.Surely if all that mass was ground into recognizeable fragments, the piles would be at least a little visible from this angle
If the rubble can fly away, why wouldn't the dust do the same? After all, it's lighter and it's been a good while since the feat took place.According to what can be seen in the image, the rubble was torn off and flew away, if it were pulverization the destroyed edges should be completely clean, however you can see remains of the building there, there is not even a bit of dust to support the pulverization.
Yes. ¿if it is pulverizatión why does the destroyed edge have building surfaces and is not completely clean?If the rubble can fly away, why wouldn't the dust do the same? After all, it's lighter and it's been a good while since the feat took place.
So if I read you correctly, you prefer the violent fragmentation end?
The edges don't have to be completely clean to be pulv. The building clearly took some of the brunt, it wasn't a clean cut (which makes sense, a powerful kinetic attack will produce shockwaves and do some fragmentation around the edges because blunt KE attacks realistically shouldn't be clean cuts irrespective of type) - so I see a collapse triggered by the attack, dislodged shingles.Yes. ¿if it is pulverizatión why does the destroyed edge have building surfaces and is not completely clean?
I mean, the calculation has not been accepted yetlol, I don't know how it was accepted