• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

STRONGEST One-Punch Man Discussion Thread!

Oh guys, I feel bad for you

Zhoniin's last Q&A

He debunked the feat

Cope + L + ratio + not based + didn't ask + don't care + malding + stay mad + skill issue + unfollowed + blocked + you fell off + cancelled + quote tweet + cry about it + seethe + pound sand + bad take + unsubbed + disliked + cope harder + spelling error + basic + tarnished + redpilled + bluepilled + triggered + the audacity + ok and? + touch grass
 
Lightning_XXI said:
Oh guys, I feel bad for you

Zhoniin's last Q&A

He debunked the feat

Cope + L + ratio + not based + didn't ask + don't care + malding + stay mad + skill issue + unfollowed + blocked + you fell off + cancelled + quote tweet + cry about it + seethe + pound sand + bad take + unsubbed + disliked + cope harder + spelling error + basic + tarnished + redpilled + bluepilled + triggered + the audacity + ok and? + touch grass
Click to expand...
Oh no. Not Zhoniin!

800px-Yamcha_found_dead.jpg
 
Last edited:
Lightning_XXI said:
Oh guys, I feel bad for you

Zhoniin's last Q&A

He debunked the feat

Cope + L + ratio + not based + didn't ask + don't care + malding + stay mad + skill issue + unfollowed + blocked + you fell off + cancelled + quote tweet + cry about it + seethe + pound sand + bad take + unsubbed + disliked + cope harder + spelling error + basic + tarnished + redpilled + bluepilled + triggered + the audacity + ok and? + touch grass
Click to expand...
He's gonna be down bad next chapter when we see a view of it lol
 
Lightning_XXI said:
Oh guys, I feel bad for you

Zhoniin's last Q&A

He debunked the feat

Cope + L + ratio + not based + didn't ask + don't care + malding + stay mad + skill issue + unfollowed + blocked + you fell off + cancelled + quote tweet + cry about it + seethe + pound sand + bad take + unsubbed + disliked + cope harder + spelling error + basic + tarnished + redpilled + bluepilled + triggered + the audacity + ok and? + touch grass
Click to expand...
Who????
 
Lightning_XXI said:
Oh guys, I feel bad for you

Zhoniin's last Q&A

He debunked the feat

Cope + L + ratio + not based + didn't ask + don't care + malding + stay mad + skill issue + unfollowed + blocked + you fell off + cancelled + quote tweet + cry about it + seethe + pound sand + bad take + unsubbed + disliked + cope harder + spelling error + basic + tarnished + redpilled + bluepilled + triggered + the audacity + ok and? + touch grass
Click to expand...
Zhoniin never misses so I wouldn't be surprised if he is right
 
Epiccheev said:
legit question, but is it possible to make a character undisputably Tier 0 in the wiki using a statement with 20 words or less from a reliable source?
Click to expand...
Only if there's context in those 20 words that mention other previously established structures/ideas that are accepted to be well into tier 1 and stuff.

The best I can some up with atm is... something like this.

"[ ] is free from and beyond every quality, limitation, description, and any other conceivable property one might ascribe to it."

This wouldn't get you Tier 0 though unless there was further context somewhere else. But it could get you 1-A depending on how legit it really is.

Using big math used to work, but not anymore. You'd need a lot more than 20 words for it.
 
To be honest, I never understood Garou's feat with the black hole in this chapter. An explosion from a combination of gravitational brass knuckles and nuclear decay covered IO and briefly swallowed all the light? The presence of a black hole near Jupiter should have destroyed it, but even on IO there was no destruction. Or did he create this black hole somewhere very far away?

And I also wonder why they used the calculation of a black hole for a gamma-ray burst, if the term black hole never appeared there?
 
NikHelton said:
To be honest, I never understood Garou's feat with the black hole in this chapter. An explosion from a combination of gravitational brass knuckles and nuclear decay covered IO and briefly swallowed all the light? The presence of a black hole near Jupiter should have destroyed it, but even on IO there was no destruction. Or did he create this black hole somewhere very far away?

And I also wonder why they used the calculation of a black hole for a gamma-ray burst, if the term black hole never appeared there?
Click to expand...
Because Black Holes are involved with Gamme Ray Bursts.
 
NikHelton said:
I may have misunderstood something, but haven't the recent images of the James Webb Telescope captured countless galaxies in the observable cosmos.

I don't want it to look like a wank, but can we use it?
Click to expand...
Probably not, because that is an infrared not visible light capture
 
Uh, slightly off topic, but should large size type 0 be added to Fuhrer Ugly's profile? He already looks twice the height of a normal human being before mutating and growing larger.
 
NikHelton said:
To be honest, I never understood Garou's feat with the black hole in this chapter. An explosion from a combination of gravitational brass knuckles and nuclear decay covered IO and briefly swallowed all the light? The presence of a black hole near Jupiter should have destroyed it, but even on IO there was no destruction. Or did he create this black hole somewhere very far away?

And I also wonder why they used the calculation of a black hole for a gamma-ray burst, if the term black hole never appeared there?
Click to expand...
Assuming that this is a black hole, I calced it and got 30.2060466 ninatons/Dwarf Star level..
 
NikHelton said:
To be honest, I never understood Garou's feat with the black hole in this chapter. An explosion from a combination of gravitational brass knuckles and nuclear decay covered IO and briefly swallowed all the light?
Click to expand...
Was someone talking about a black hole in this chapter? This kind of seems like it's coming out of nowhere but you're talking like it's a forgone conclusion that we've discussed before :unsure:
NikHelton said:
The presence of a black hole near Jupiter should have destroyed it, but even on IO there was no destruction. Or did he create this black hole somewhere very far away?
Click to expand...
Bringing enough geothermal energy to warp the plates should have been enough to do more damage to the planet than what was seen there. A gamma ray burst so close should have been more than enough to destroy the planet even if it didn't directly hit it. This is a common thing in fiction and thus these kinds of arguments ignore attack potency for destruction capacity which results in a type of fallacy in the argument.
NikHelton said:
And I also wonder why they used the calculation of a black hole for a gamma-ray burst, if the term black hole never appeared there?
Click to expand...
It works on the assumption that Gamma ray bursts that are formed by evaporating black holes are being copied by Garou as evidenced by onscreen suctions of the surroundings surrounding the sphere. I honestly don't like it either.

To be fair, there was a calc for the actual gamma ray burst but the calculation member deleted it for unknown (and probably stupid tbh) reasons.
 
ZillertheBucko said:
Need a list of every series 3-B garou solos
this is very important
Click to expand...
Coming back to this for a sec.

He solos almost any non-action series out there, obviously.

He could probably solo most mainstream anime. Demon Slayer shouldn't be mentioned, MHA would get obliterated, One Piece is a hard W for Garou, probably Fairy Tale but I've never seen it (I've just heard enough to say that they probably stand 0 chance), he should have enough hax in addition to the raw physical stat gap to solo the Naruto verse (I'd even say comfortably). Bleach, JoJo's, and JJK are too haxed, although an argument could still be made for Garou in regards to JJK, but only with verse equalization of course. Naturally, he shitstomps AoT, Death Note, and other fodder verses anywhere around those tiers. He could reasonably take most of DB out, stopping only around DBS in all likelihood.

With the exception of Dormammu, he probably solos the MCU, hard to say. Could likely solo any animated DC or Marvel series.

Naturally, he also solos all the verses you mentioned, such as The Boys and Invincible, and could do so easily.

At this point I'd place Garou as a mid-tier in fictional powerscaling, even without putting him as high as 3-B, albeit fairly on the low-end of mid-tier.
 
Emirp sumitpo said:
Alioth is from the Loki TV show. Basically a mindless 2-A beast but who's slow as **** (MHS+ lmao). And Arishem is the stongest Celestial from Eternals.
Click to expand...
Oh pog a Celestial actually shows up in Eternals? Is it a flashback thing or an actual active character? Cause I remember a Celestial planet wiping in GOTG but they never really got brought up after that iirc. The Living Tribunal also got referenced once in Doctor Strange. The MCU still has so much unexplored stuff to cover based on the source material, they've barely tapped into what Marvel has produced over the many years.

And yeah makes sense I missed those two. I haven't watched either show yet. I've mainly focused on the movies. The MCU movies have been great but I kinda lost faith in comic-book adapted reality shows, I only ever paid attention to the animated ones.
 
RinneItachi said:
Oh pog a Celestial actually shows up in Eternals? Is it a flashback thing or an actual active character? Cause I remember a Celestial planet wiping in GOTG but they never really got brought up after that iirc. The Living Tribunal also got referenced once in Doctor Strange. The MCU still has so much unexplored stuff to cover based on the source material, they've barely tapped into what Marvel has produced over the many years.
Click to expand...
Actual active character. He shows up in intro and at the end of the movie.

The one in GOTG is being revised currently. But normal MCU celestials are 4-C. I think Eternity is in Thor Love and Thunder but is featless afaik.
 
Pepsiman25th said:
Anything think the chapter will come out by Wednesday?
Click to expand...
Probably. Nothing has suggested otherwise and Murata is popping off even more than usual lately. So not only will it probably be Wednesday again (Thursday for Murata), but it's probably gonna be an even bigger chapter than the regular ones.
 
I was re-reading manga Garou vs Saitama and man, Saitama really is just ******* with him before Cosmic Garou.

He sees that Garou wanted to be a hero but instead of dissecting his ideology and giving him a reality check he just teases and makes fun of Garou further aggravating him. Saitama ends up being counterproductive with his lazy and careless approach.

This then results in God being able to trick Garou and Saitama only realizes his mistake when it's too late.

I actually really like it, the webcomic fight was about Garou but this one is about both, which doesn't mean the wc fight is any lesser mind you. I think next chapter might be the finale of the fight itself? Murata has done like 70+ pages already...
 
Lightning_XXI said:
Oh guys, I feel bad for you

Zhoniin's last Q&A

He debunked the feat

Cope + L + ratio + not based + didn't ask + don't care + malding + stay mad + skill issue + unfollowed + blocked + you fell off + cancelled + quote tweet + cry about it + seethe + pound sand + bad take + unsubbed + disliked + cope harder + spelling error + basic + tarnished + redpilled + bluepilled + triggered + the audacity + ok and? + touch grass
Click to expand...
Saitama and garous punch just bent the light. The irrefutable bobsican argument
 
Nehz_XZX said:
You are repeating yourself and there is no point in being repetitive if the person you are talking to can still recall the first time you've said it just fine. The fact that I can see the first time you've said these almost exactly identical words just by scrolling up a little bit makes this even more redundant.

These are obviously rather extreme examples and show a certain degree stubbornness and a willingness to simply stretch logic to suit their purposes. People like that would most likely get their threads closed and if they display toxic behavior in their efforts to prove their opinions, get banned. I don't see any of that as a reason to make a joke and I feel like as if the only reason why you would make one in this situation would be to mock them. At the very least it's the only reason that I could personally think of and it makes me think that it would be a really obnoxious thing to do that would sour future interactions.
Click to expand...
I did it with a rimuru fan now he is a good friend of mine not always they will your debating with will feel bad about their Statment is just being mock that has nothing to do with them it's just they think thier character win but mocking them will not harm them in anyway cause thier is nothing toxic in mocking their if they don't understand when you tell them about scaling and tiering just mock thier Statment thier is nothing bad about mocking someone Statment
 
Nehz_XZX said:
You are repeating yourself and there is no point in being repetitive if the person you are talking to can still recall the first time you've said it just fine. The fact that I can see the first time you've said these almost exactly identical words just by scrolling up a little bit makes this even more redundant.

These are obviously rather extreme examples and show a certain degree stubbornness and a willingness to simply stretch logic to suit their purposes. People like that would most likely get their threads closed and if they display toxic behavior in their efforts to prove their opinions, get banned. I don't see any of that as a reason to make a joke and I feel like as if the only reason why you would make one in this situation would be to mock them. At the very least it's the only reason that I could personally think of and it makes me think that it would be a really obnoxious thing to do that would sour future interactions.
Click to expand...
I am not saying you mock his Statment right at the moment he said something wrong I said after explaining to him several times still didn't want to understand . Then just mock his statement and then give exaple if he said that Statment was wrong means if someone said tanjiro can win against Saitama for example ok and you explained to him several times about scaling then just say a normal human solos tanjiro if he said he can't then say then how can you think tanjiro can defeat Saitama with no feat just example ok.
 
Hajun said:
I am not saying you mock his Statment right at the moment he said something wrong I said after explaining to him several times still didn't want to understand . Then just mock his statement and then give exaple if he said that Statment was wrong means if someone said tanjiro can win against Saitama for example ok and you explained to him several times about scaling then just say a normal human solos tanjiro if he said he can't then say then how can you think tanjiro can defeat Saitama with no feat just example ok.
Click to expand...
Retype this bro 💀
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TyranoDoom30
OPM profiles possible renaming
Replies
5
Views
3K
Recon1511
Recon1511
Kachon123
One-Punch Man: Genos Profile Rework
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
WizardPowers101
Kachon123
One-Punch Man: Adding Willpower to Some Profiles
Replies
12
Views
2K
Kachon123
Kachon123
Phoenks
  • Locked
"Possibly" 3-C Saitama
2 3 4
Replies
149
Views
17K
Phoenks
Phoenks
Marvel_Champion_07
Low 7-B Puri-Puri Prisoner
Replies
23
Views
2K
Marvel_Champion_07
Marvel_Champion_07
Back
Top