5 emeralds did this, not that I don't agree with 5-B+ but it's clear that 5-B+ isn't the least they can output.
We're not scaling the Classics to their lowest feat, we're scaling them to what tier they should rightfully be. 5 Chaos Emeralds, if we assume one to be Planet level, can still perform a Country level feat. It's not like it's the peak of their power, and that feat was simply done to set an example iirc.
Also I think the low end for Supers should be high 4-C due to the star level statement from the Eclipse cannon and the Nega Wisp calc, which would scale to Mother Wisp.
The Eclipse Cannon isn't High 4-C, if you'd read the full OP you'd know that it was evaluated as 5-A.
Also, High 4-C is a supporting feat for Mother Wisp, she can still scale to the 4-A end of Super Sonic.
Stop bringing up the 6-B feat, because one emerald could also repel the Low 2-C Time Eater
Low 2-C's not a good example of AP, because it's mainly in the hax of the Chaos Emeralds to repel evil forces, and their hax are already 4D.
They vary, that's why it repealed the Time Eater.
Again, no it isn't. It's in their nature to repel dark forces. We see that when they automatically vaporize storms in Sonic Chaos, when the Master Emerald restored the entire planet by itself in Sonic Advance 3, when the Chaos Emeralds made Mephiles' shady goop disappear in Sonic 06 and when they repelled Time Eater.
Chaos Emeralds already warp space-time, which is 4D. Them using more 4D hax isn't a shocker.
The 6-B feat being a warning shot doesn't really disprove anything because that's the lowest feat. If a warning shot was that easy they could've just used 1 emerald.
The point of a warning shot is to not cause lots of damage. They had already set up the 5 Chaos Emeralds regardless, there's no point in saying they should've used one when it's already amped by 5.
By the looks of it, you're trying to disprove a variable tier, so why is 'outlier' such a big deal now?
If you don't want a variable tier, you want an exact rating, which is where the term "outlier" would be useful. This is a bad point.
Also a warning shot doesn't always mean you're making your attacks weaker. The actual meaning for warning shot is purposely misfiring your attack just to show your target what you're capable of.
This is also not true. A warning shot in this context means that "I can do worse, because this is just a fraction of what I can do." There's no solid definition of a warning shot, so you can't say it's misfiring something. Within this context, it's a fraction of capability meant to instill fear in others.
We already settled this in another thread. Stop backtracking and causing ad nauseum when there's nothing more to contribute.
True, but you'd still have to consider that the moon feat is technically A low 5-B one, due to your corrections of the feat. The moon has no relevance to Eggman so blowing it up wasn't his concern. So that's another lower feat.
Imagine that! You can have lower tier feats but still have higher power ratings? And that the authors aren't going to show off something's full potential every single time it does something? That's crazy!
Even if higher amounts caused lesser events, that in no regard contradicts a single Chaos Emerald consistently having Planetary abilities. The logical definition of "consistent" is that multiple premises can be true at the same time, and you can have lower feats and that not ruin your consistency.
