- 11,943
- 4,289
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ian said Solaris had dimensional destroying powerWhat about Solaris consuming, the meaning of time?
alot of contradictory stuffHe also thinks Sonic doesn’t scale to Solaris’s power
I meant in the JP script which states that Solaris will destroy the very meaning of timeIan said Solaris had dimensional destroying power
He said the emeralds could wreck everything and do whatever the plot wants them to do, and he thinks Solaris was empowered by the emeralds with it was rebirthed.
Yeah no our tiering could still stay intact even with Ian's inconsistent thoughts.
I don’t see anything wrong with it. Proof is proof and it’s blatant. You can’t just dismiss something because it came from Geburah, that’s not how evaluating evidence works and it isn’t against the rules. The case being implied from you is it’s okay to dismiss proof because it came from a specific person rather than the quality of the proof itself which sets a bad example for the community. So do you have a rebuttal for the statement or do you not?a lead question from Zastando......yeah no, never will we use something that came from the shame of the sonic fandom such as Zastando here, no
That came from the JP subtitles of the game as well.I meant in the JP script which states that Solaris will destroy the very meaning of time
Can you show the rule? I still haven’t been shown the quote.No. This goes against our site rules, which specifically disallow the pestering of authors and the like to get certain scaling info out of them
I do not take Ian seriously half the time and I think he's only answering these questions for the money, but in the case for Eitaro I don't think "pestering" them is valid.Can you show the rule? I still haven’t been shown the quote.
On the "Offsite Rules" section of this page, it says as follows:Can you show the rule? I still haven’t been shown the quote.
Do not pester or harass the authors of various works on social media about versus debating or character statistics. They are often bombarded by numerous questions from fans, and thus are rarely interested in giving a serious response. In addition, the statements they give to appease users are often contradictory to the feats in the stories of the works they have written. Thus, it is frowned upon to bother them over these topics.
Leading questions areI don’t see anything wrong with it. Proof is proof and it’s blatant. You can’t just dismiss something because it came from Geburah, that’s not how evaluating evidence works and it isn’t against the rules.
The question wasn’t about versus debating or character statistics, I’m pretty sure the question was actually about Solaris’ capabilities based on lore and if you look at the reasoning for this in the same quote it states “They are often bombarded by numerous questions from fans, and thus are rarely interested in giving a serious response. In addition, the statements they give to appease users are often contradictory to the feats in the stories of the works they have written”On the "Offsite Rules" section of this page, it says as follows:
I don’t see the point you’re making, you could make a leading question but it doesn’t matter because he said yes anyway not maybe or possibly. A yes is a yes. This isn’t a court where these kinds of questions determine if someone is innocent or guilty. This is about fictional characters.Leading questions are
A leading question, as the name says, is all about leading the one being questioned to an specific answerI don’t see the point you’re making, you could make a leading question but it doesn’t matter because he said yes anyway not maybe or possibly. A yes is a yes. This isn’t a court where these kinds of questions determine if someone is innocent or guilty. This is about fictional characters.
It means you can ask a question in a specific way to get the answer you want, and then use that to change profiles. That's pretty much manipulationI don’t see the point you’re making, you could make a leading question but it doesn’t matter because he said yes anyway not maybe or possibly. A yes is a yes. This isn’t a court where these kinds of questions determine if someone is innocent or guilty. This is about fictional characters.
WellA leading question, as the name says, is all about leading the one being questioned to an specific answer
I mean not really, if what Ian says is up against the source material and it doesn’t mix then nothing happens but if it is compatible with the material then you go with it. I think if something is too goony then we leave it (obviously).It means you can ask a question in a specific way to get the answer you want, and then use that to change profiles. That's pretty much manipulation
Can you give me a scan of this? Is this said in the game? I don't remember this lineI meant in the JP script which states that Solaris will destroy the very meaning of time
That Busy Dude posted it aboveCan you give me a scan of this? Is this said in the game? I don't remember this line
It’s said in the game and I just posted itCan you give me a scan of this? Is this said in the game? I don't remember this line
It’s alright.I have no idea how I missed your postdon't call me out, @Eseseso
He may not, but i doI have no idea how I missed your postdon't call me out, @Eseseso
I have no idea how I missed your postdon't call me out, @Eseseso
I'll take you up on this please, thank youIf you want me to get a screenshot of the specific quote then I’ll do that too.
THE TYPE 1! THE TYPE 1 CONCEPTUAL MANIPULATION SOLARIS IS REAL!I'll take you up on this please, thank you
THE TYPE 1! THE TYPE 1 CONCEPTUAL MANIPULATION SOLARIS IS REAL!
Source:
Btw you’re not gonna like who I got this from.
THE TYPE 1! THE TYPE 1 CONCEPTUAL MANIPULATION SOLARIS IS REAL!
Source:
Btw you’re not gonna like who I got this from.
off course is reffering to solarisI used deepl and I got this
"時間の意味そのものを消滅させるつもりなのだ"
They intend to extinguish the very meaning of time itself.
Obviously "they" is referring to Solaris
Yeah I said thatoff course is reffering to solaris
THE TYPE 1! THE TYPE 1 CONCEPTUAL MANIPULATION SOLARIS IS REAL!
Source:
Btw you’re not gonna like who I got this from.
cof cof death battle matchups sub reddit,cof cofYeah I said that
But some people have negative reading comprehension so I unfortunately developed a tendency to say the most obvious things because some people don't find it obvious.
Geburah's negative was almost always the powerscaling, right? He's a good person in real life, right?Ahh, Geb. He might be a Sonic goon and a creep, but at least he has some useful info sometimes.
A creep? Huh. Anyways, this should be fine now.Ahh, Geb. He might be a Sonic goon and a creep, but at least he has some useful info sometimes.