- 7,003
- 1,871
Second key: “stronger than before”
How has this completely obvious lie manage to stay on the profile for so long, especially since it was used to justify Link being a ridiculously higher tier. The game straight up says the exact opposite: (12:45)
Zelda says you haven’t regained your full power. This line plays even if you have done everything you can do in the game, Zelda always says you are still weaker.
I also have problems with Link scaling to Calamity Ganon at all. I’ll grab the scan for one of things tomorrow, but for everything else:
You shot ganon in the back 4 times before the fight even begins with weapons designed to kill ganon, with these weapons stated to be stealing ganons strength beforehand (which I have a scan for but its on my switch and it’s late where I am) so the weapons both weakened him and shot him while amped, you then stab him with a sword specifically designed to kill him, then none of that mattered anyways because Ganon then flexs his might on you and Zelda says Link straight up can’t hurt him and needs the bow of light to ignore his durability to win. And even with that Link achieved literally nothing and Ganon was going to kill him until Zelda stepped in and sealed him away, which as revealed by BotW 2, also achieved nothing. Ganon can also instantly kill Link in a single hit even with max health, plus fully upgraded armor, while blocking.
So Link’s profile needs to be vastly reworded. Instead of being at least 6-C he’ll be at most 6-C with the new justification pointing out he can barely wield the master sword without it killing him and him being weaker than before (the master sword is more support for him being weaker and not scaling to calamity Ganon since even trying to wield the master sword practically killed him). Adding even more onto that guardians are repeatedly stated to be immensely dangerous for Link to fight and single ones can constantly stomp link throughout the entire game. Link in the past killed so many an entire field was covered in their corpses and this was when he only had a sword and shield vs post calamity were he has time stop and dozens of other different tools.
I don’t see anyway people can justify calamity link is somehow stronger than pre calamity link when the game actively tells us he is weaker and he can’t even pick up his main weapon without nearly dying.
Edit: Probably shouldn’t have posted this while going to bed, but the biggest part of the revision, link being stronger, is impossible to disprove the game says clear as day that is false: so I can sleep easy. For the Ganon stuff I know people will probably disagree, but I just don’t see Link scaling. Again the boss fight starts with Ganon being shot in the back four times, that in and of itself makes me think he shouldn’t scale.
Edit 2: I misremembered how much health you can get in the game. So change the sword killing Link to hurting link. Still good support for him being weaker, but not as bad as before.
after some discuss the at least before 6-C is definitely going, but at most probably won’t be added. The justification just needs to be cleanly reworded.
How has this completely obvious lie manage to stay on the profile for so long, especially since it was used to justify Link being a ridiculously higher tier. The game straight up says the exact opposite: (12:45)
Zelda says you haven’t regained your full power. This line plays even if you have done everything you can do in the game, Zelda always says you are still weaker.
I also have problems with Link scaling to Calamity Ganon at all. I’ll grab the scan for one of things tomorrow, but for everything else:
You shot ganon in the back 4 times before the fight even begins with weapons designed to kill ganon, with these weapons stated to be stealing ganons strength beforehand (which I have a scan for but its on my switch and it’s late where I am) so the weapons both weakened him and shot him while amped, you then stab him with a sword specifically designed to kill him, then none of that mattered anyways because Ganon then flexs his might on you and Zelda says Link straight up can’t hurt him and needs the bow of light to ignore his durability to win. And even with that Link achieved literally nothing and Ganon was going to kill him until Zelda stepped in and sealed him away, which as revealed by BotW 2, also achieved nothing. Ganon can also instantly kill Link in a single hit even with max health, plus fully upgraded armor, while blocking.
So Link’s profile needs to be vastly reworded. Instead of being at least 6-C he’ll be at most 6-C with the new justification pointing out he can barely wield the master sword without it killing him and him being weaker than before (the master sword is more support for him being weaker and not scaling to calamity Ganon since even trying to wield the master sword practically killed him). Adding even more onto that guardians are repeatedly stated to be immensely dangerous for Link to fight and single ones can constantly stomp link throughout the entire game. Link in the past killed so many an entire field was covered in their corpses and this was when he only had a sword and shield vs post calamity were he has time stop and dozens of other different tools.
I don’t see anyway people can justify calamity link is somehow stronger than pre calamity link when the game actively tells us he is weaker and he can’t even pick up his main weapon without nearly dying.
Edit: Probably shouldn’t have posted this while going to bed, but the biggest part of the revision, link being stronger, is impossible to disprove the game says clear as day that is false: so I can sleep easy. For the Ganon stuff I know people will probably disagree, but I just don’t see Link scaling. Again the boss fight starts with Ganon being shot in the back four times, that in and of itself makes me think he shouldn’t scale.
Edit 2: I misremembered how much health you can get in the game. So change the sword killing Link to hurting link. Still good support for him being weaker, but not as bad as before.
after some discuss the at least before 6-C is definitely going, but at most probably won’t be added. The justification just needs to be cleanly reworded.
Last edited: