- 10,398
- 4,557
You can't use the black hole formula for Swampfire as you'd need to go very far to even imply that and Gravattack uses gravity hax, I don't feel confident scaling that to his regular AP.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Should Ben's Aliens scale to Rex Salazar?
- Thread starter JarvinJepe
- Start date
- Status
You can't use the black hole formula for Swampfire as you'd need to go very far to even imply that and Gravattack uses gravity hax, I don't feel confident scaling that to his regular AP.
- 10,398
- 4,557
Man I'm starting to feel more like Zamasu by the day.
- 9,929
- 6,302
Good thing you have me then...
- 512
- 284
- 512
- 284
- 10,398
- 4,557
And no, their high-end stuff is literally trash and Kuro puts all aliens in a different tier which shows a fundamental misunderstanding of Ben 10 scaling. With my scaling at worst you call it an outlier.
- 10,398
- 4,557
No, now bow
- 10,398
- 4,557
TrueGood thing you have me then...
- 9,929
- 6,302
- 50
- 35
- Thread starter
- #90
But isn't that an Ice Manipulation feat and not a physical feat? I assume it's required to scale the Aliens to Rex because they were punching each other. Would Upchuck's up to High 6-A Energy Manipulation count as tier 6 feat if you're going to use that Big Chill feat?
- 8,845
- 9,506
You’re starting to see it too huh
- 9,929
- 6,302
Zamasu is like: You know the rules and so do I 
- 10,398
- 4,557
Yeah, I hate it.
- 11,871
- 4,274
Bump
- 11,871
- 4,274
Bump
- 8,845
- 9,506
NO BUMPS FOR YOU!
- 9,929
- 6,302
- 11,871
- 4,274
About this, armodrillo has a statement of being able to destroy mountains and was calculated and accepted as mountain level closer to tier 6
So by this it should be fine by you now right?
Jason_Courne
He/Him- 1,178
- 1,298
It would probably scale to physicals because Rex could resist / fight against Big Chill's ice manip
- 9,929
- 6,302
Rex Salazar has been downgraded to High 8-C.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Rex stops a space elevator
vsbattles.fandom.com
Oliver_de_jesus
He/Him- 24,532
- 17,708
7-CRex Salazar has been downgraded to High 8-C.
Rex stops a space elevator
- 9,929
- 6,302
Why 7-C ? It should be High 8-C.
- 320
- 234
You have to or we have to remove generator Rex from the cosmology
we can’t pick and choose which parts of the verse affect the other especially when we know it’s all canon anyways
Oliver_de_jesus
He/Him- 24,532
- 17,708
I say due the blog say 7-C
- 2,127
- 1,726
- 8,845
- 9,506
Huh???
- 10,398
- 4,557
Disagree, we can assume a unit.Rex Salazar has been downgraded to High 8-C.
Rex stops a space elevator
- 10,398
- 4,557
He’s going the everybody should be tier 8 route and claims tier 7 is an outlier.
- 9,929
- 6,302
That's cool and all but.....we need to gather some calc members then ask them to recalc it again using various of other methods
- 8,845
- 9,506
Why? You have no proof of what the unit is.
- 11,871
- 4,274
We make assumptions all the times in calculations, analise the context and see what would be the most likely assumptions and make ends for the ones you think are most likely
- 8,845
- 9,506
No. We make valid assumptions in calcs. Some even get away with things that they shouldn’t.
In this scenario we can’t make an assumption on what A. We have a literal distance and timeframe. B. We have NO unit attached to it. C. Fictional media can make up their own units all the time.
Be fr and tell me an out of left field assumption is a better than the obvious distance and timeframe we have right in our faces.
- 11,871
- 4,274
If it is a logical assumption then it wouldn't hurt to go with it
- 10,398
- 4,557
m/s because Americans are dumdums. What do you think NASA uses?
- 10,398
- 4,557
Oh you did it better than Liger, cinematic timing vs no given unit, hmmm.
- 8,845
- 9,506
Pffft
Both of your arguments are pretty much “well is shoooould be X unit” without actually giving evidence.
This is also incorrect as there are no cuts. It’s all one sequence.
- 11,871
- 4,274
If we have part of the information, then we can assume the other part with the most likely units for it, seriously we do that all the time around here
- 8,845
- 9,506
It doesn’t matter when we have something way more concrete. On screen distance and timeframe > assumptions. If there were no proper tmeframe, then I'd probably have less of an issue with it. My issue is that you're taking headcanon over something that was blatant.
Unless you show me examples, stop saying that. If it's flawed now then it's flawed when it was used before. Be logical.
- 11,871
- 4,274
How did you got the current speed? Because if it was calculating then yours is as much of an "assumptions" then applying a logical measurament to an on screen speed meter, what will ot hurt to use a logical assumption?
Making assumptions is a pretty basic thing is it not?
- Status
