• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Should Ben's Aliens scale to Rex Salazar?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do you people always use the worst feats possible, from Skye and Kuro no less.

You can't use the black hole formula for Swampfire as you'd need to go very far to even imply that and Gravattack uses gravity hax, I don't feel confident scaling that to his regular AP.
 
Wait how do you know about that?

And no, their high-end stuff is literally trash and Kuro puts all aliens in a different tier which shows a fundamental misunderstanding of Ben 10 scaling. With my scaling at worst you call it an outlier.
 
At the moment I'm pretty sure there's 2 feats, one for Big Chill making it snow in the Null void and the other for Vilgax surviving his ship's explosion but I'm not sure what their current status is.
But isn't that an Ice Manipulation feat and not a physical feat? I assume it's required to scale the Aliens to Rex because they were punching each other. Would Upchuck's up to High 6-A Energy Manipulation count as tier 6 feat if you're going to use that Big Chill feat?
 
According to that rule mentioned above the feats of Ben's aliens need to be consistent with Rex's, meaning Ben needs 6-C feats of his own. So I disagree with cross-scaling them for now.
About this, armodrillo has a statement of being able to destroy mountains and was calculated and accepted as mountain level closer to tier 6
So by this it should be fine by you now right?
 
Disagree scaling Tier to Ben based on VBW rules

Agree with the addition to Rex
You have to or we have to remove generator Rex from the cosmology

we can’t pick and choose which parts of the verse affect the other especially when we know it’s all canon anyways
 
we can’t pick and choose which parts of the verse affect the other especially when we know it’s all canon anyways
The word "Outlier" doesn't apply to cosmology.
1079802639329534124.png
 
We make assumptions all the times in calculations, analise the context and see what would be the most likely assumptions and make ends for the ones you think are most likely
No. We make valid assumptions in calcs. Some even get away with things that they shouldn’t.
In this scenario we can’t make an assumption on what A. We have a literal distance and timeframe. B. We have NO unit attached to it. C. Fictional media can make up their own units all the time.

Be fr and tell me an out of left field assumption is a better than the obvious distance and timeframe we have right in our faces.
 
No. We make valid assumptions in calcs. Some even get away with things that they shouldn’t.
In this scenario we can’t make an assumption on what A. We have a literal distance and timeframe. B. We have NO unit attached to it. C. Fictional media can make up their own units all the time.

Be fr and tell me an out of left field assumption is a better than the obvious distance and timeframe we have right in our faces.
If it is a logical assumption then it wouldn't hurt to go with it
 
If it is a logical assumption then it wouldn't hurt to go with it
m/s because Americans are dumdums. What do you think NASA uses?
says that about an American cartoon
Pffft
Both of your arguments are pretty much “well is shoooould be X unit” without actually giving evidence.
Oh you did it better than Liger, cinematic timing vs no given unit, hmmm.
This is also incorrect as there are no cuts. It’s all one sequence.
 
Pffft
Both of your arguments are pretty much “well is shoooould be X unit” without actually giving evidence.

This is also incorrect as there are no cuts. It’s all one sequence.
If we have part of the information, then we can assume the other part with the most likely units for it, seriously we do that all the time around here
 
If we have part of the information, then we can assume the other part with the most likely units for it,
It doesn’t matter when we have something way more concrete. On screen distance and timeframe > assumptions. If there were no proper tmeframe, then I'd probably have less of an issue with it. My issue is that you're taking headcanon over something that was blatant.
seriously we do that all the time around here
Unless you show me examples, stop saying that. If it's flawed now then it's flawed when it was used before. Be logical.
 
It doesn’t matter when we have something way more concrete. On screen distance and timeframe > assumptions. If there were no proper tmeframe, then I'd probably have less of an issue with it. My issue is that you're taking headcanon over something that was blatant.
How did you got the current speed? Because if it was calculating then yours is as much of an "assumptions" then applying a logical measurament to an on screen speed meter, what will ot hurt to use a logical assumption?

Unless you show me examples, stop saying that. If it's flawed now then it's flawed when it was used before. Be logical.
Making assumptions is a pretty basic thing is it not?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top