Shinra Tensei speed of light

[Sasukesama0492]

Bump

 

[Floxy178]

Bump

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

Not every single gravity power is treated as lightspeed IIRC, and Shinra Tensei isn't necessarily gravity itself. I believe that it is just treated as attractive and repulsive force; not gravity, and not inherently lightspeed.

So I disagree with this CRT. This topic has been brought up multiple times before:

Naruto: Shinra Tensei LS?

Shinra Tensei is a Gravity Wave and Gravity Waves Travel at LS. This means that Nagato/Madara/Sasuke/Hagoromo would have Light Speed Attack Speed with Shinra Tensei only. This wouldn't change their Speed though being nobody has reacted to Shinra Tensei. The closest anyone has come was 6tk...

vsbattles.com

LS Attack Speed with Shinra Tensei

Translation: "[[Shinra-tensei (All-Nature Repulsion). Ninjutsu, Keke-genkai, offensive, defensive, close range. Users:Nagato Invisible hand of God, that repels anything in creation! Pain Tendou uses this jutsu, utilizing the generated from the users hands repulsive (gravity) force to repel...

vsbattles.com

Shinra Tensei is Light Speed (Naruto)

What the title says is true. I don't know if this has been brought up before, but Shinra Tensei is a LS attack, now whether we want to accept it as such, is a differen't story, but note prior that it scales to no one,' 'only Pain's Attack Speed with it, as nobody in the verse has been able to...

vsbattles.com

Should a discussion rule be made at this point? Or just closing this since it has been rejected.

 

[UchihaSlayer96]

Should a discussion rule be made at this point? Or just closing this since it has been rejected.

Definitely close it. Neutral on a Discussion Rule. Don't think it's awfully necessary, though.

 

[Spectra_Schiffer]

It's already proven that the attack is a wave and does initial damage, I don't think we have a reason to consider it as gravitational force

I stated that I agreed with the counter arguments on this issue. Anyway, this topic will be closed anyway as it has received enough rejections.

 

[Spectra_Schiffer]

Should a discussion rule be made at this point?

I agree with this btw. It's a topic that has been brought up many times before and always the same arguments. Repeating this in the future will be nothing but a waste of time, just like now

 

[Damage3245]

Should a discussion rule be made at this point? Or just closing this since it has been rejected.

Yes, I think so given the number of threads on it.

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

I have closed this then.

Yes, I think so given the number of threads on it.

Maybe a follow up thread can be made later to properly hash it out then.