- 2,677
- 780
we don't know if he was going to say "sta per sparare", he could have been saying "sta per scappare", given how the guy turned around, or he could be saying something about the sleeping gas cannister the guy is holding and Dylan actually knows aboutBut wasn't Dylan about to say "Quello sta per sparare?" Why he should've said that if he didn't know that he had a gun, or at least supposed so, since he clearly had bad intentions.
The assassin is like a top tier CIA spy, it's not that far fetched to say he'd have that kind of reaction timeBut if Dylan was actually so fast to dodge the bullets, he consequently shot almost immediately, and the other guy should have had really good reactions to hide behind a wall, because the entire thing should have happened in a very short timeframe.
What ultimately sells me about my interpretation is the whole pannel dedicated just to the guy shooting right before the one in which Dylan ducks. Why show that pannel as separate if you wanted to show Dylan ducking before the gunshots? Doesn't make any sense to me.On the other points I think that the scene is open to different interpretations (and I wouldn't exclude wonky timing of the action) but previous knowledge and distance can greatly change the outcome of the feat. (granted, I consider your stance valid, since that's what happens in the scene after all).