No. It is even said that "sometimes" it dreams of being human. There are worlds besides Minecraft and the real world.
I never denied that they sometimes dreamed of being human, and although I never said anything against that, there was nothing about that sentence to bring up worlds beside Minecraft. At this point this is reaching.
It did. But so did it create others.
... and this debunks me, how?
We assume Obsidian is night indestructable, and we literally assume Steve can fight with a bunch of arrows through his head, so that's two of the three exemples you gave being accepted. And the rest is not even an argument against what I said. Likewise, this doesn't prove that the hard and soft part referred to the game world, as opposed to any other world they could have imagined.
I assume you took this time to re-watch the final part of the game. Do you not agree they make it immensely clear that the world of Minecraft is a game, made from energy going on and off, which forms zeroes and ones, which forms the words on the screen that the player percieves to read?
We don't assume Obsidian is nigh indestructible. First of, it straight up is, only canonically destroyed with diamond pickaxes and the Wither. Second off, the Mobestiary supports how
durable obsidian is on the Wither page when referring to how powerful the boss is. The game did not have to put arrows in Steve's head when he got hit. In fact, it used to not. It was later added into the game. Idk why you use the word "assume" when it's blatantly there, not vaguely there.
The rest is exactly an argument, and nothing you've said proves otherwise.
Who told you that we do NOT address Minecraft as a game? It's literally the in AP section of the real player?
What are you arguing?
Even assuming that, that is not an argument against it. Do you agree or not, that the final portion outright states that the game is actually a game as percieved by the player?
Regardless, you either take all game mechanics or you don't take them. The only actual mechanic that is outright claimed is that death is just an inconvinience.
No one ever said it WAS NOT a game. At this point make a CRT for Doki Doki Literature Club as well. Actually no, at this point make a wiki-wide CRT thread for all game verses that have a reality and fiction in its lore of treating itself as a game. You confuse something being a game with ignoring all the feats in the game and assuming everything is game mechanics.
Y'know what's funny? Undertale canonically addresses taking turns in combat, and the way to beat Sans is literally by cheating. Undertale blatantly calls this out but you don't ever bring it up in a vs thread, I assume.
Well, I'm not looking to change the profile. It already assumes a bunch of game mechanics are canon.
If you're not looking to change the profile why is this discussion still going on? You're looking to change the idea of what is stated on Steve's page in the middle of a vs thread just so fall damage can be a factor.