I just forgot how early Super Missiles and Power Bombs are obtained in SM as they’re Samus’s mightiest weapons, but tough surfaces still can be destroyed by them only if they’re weakened.
No, something tells me you're purposely twisting or leaving out vital information, you've already been called out on it multiple times and some points are extremely blatant. Power Bombs and Super Missiles
arent Samus strongest weapons, especially Power Bombs as they're explicitly so weak that Samus can canonically withstand them at ground zero with zero damage. And again, you're making that completely up, as said, I can find examples where it's stated such material is reinforced and will be destroyed none the less? Do you simply not read?
This also applies to her mimicker’s case, those other characters’ cases depend on materials’ properties, and when have her weapons been shown to be able trip through a game? Last, turn-based battles are a non-canon GM.
Except it doesn't, stop ******* lying, those character's cases depends on the material's property? Do you need me to give you a list of every time in Fusion alone? Three of the sectors by the end of the game are almost completely torn apart by various enemies like Nightmare, BOX or SA-X. You're trying to tell me the floor and ceiling that SA-X has been shown to destroy is somehow weakened? Even though in multiple cases Samus goes through those locations and the things that end up being completely ravaged are 100% no different then the rest of the level geometry? When have they shown? Gee I don't know probably one such time being the SA-X who is shown time and time again to literally rearrange a sectors geography.
I mean attacks taking advantage of materials’ properties (like bombs can do what missiles can’t and viceversa), not special attacks.
What's the difference between the Jungle sector, Ice Sector and so on's walls then? Honestly stop making shit up it's getting annoying. There is
nothing special or different about the station's walls, ceilings and so on and the examples that do get torn through like wet tissue sure as hell aren't any different then the rest of the material that makes up the same wall or room. Stop forcing your made up bullshit into things because no body is ever going to take you seriously when half of what you say is just completely made up. Hell the SA-X at one point completely ravages a giant room putting numerous holes throughout the room with a beam weapon let alone missiles and bombs so even then, and she does it onscreen.
I know those icons are only visual indicators, but they still indicate the surface is somehow weakened, and that moment occurs during gameplay but doesn’t increase or decrease challenge to be a non-canon GM.
Except they don't, I even went through a text rip of Fusion and nowhere in the game does it ever say that those materials are weakened or any different from anything else, again, it's just you assuming they are because Samus can't just vaporize a hole in any wall because it's a ******* video game.
They can withstand as well as undamaged surfaces can, so they have certain physical properties.
The **** are you even talking about here? The only physical property here is if something is simply durable or not durable unless otherwise specified.
Yeah no shit? You're just repeating yourself now, this doesn't counter anything I said. You said nothing new so I won't either.
"No, that's literally you extrapolating that the SA-X entering a sector once it notices it was unlocked and thus went there to mean it was incapable of entering without it being unlocked (even though it had no issue entering any of the other sectors even when locked)."
"You mean the link that doesn't actually say she couldnt do it without the security locks being unrestricted and is shown to be demonstrably false at multiple points in the game. All that link says is that by releasing the lock the SA-X invaded the water sector. I hope to god you aren't trying to argue that SA-X can't rip apart locks, doors, rooms and the like when all throughout the game we see the aftermath of it's trail. Even destroying pathways and the like."
“Structural weakness detected in Sandstone block.”, Multiple microscopic fractures found throughout Sandstone wall section.”… Yes, her scanner tells her if an obstacle is weakened, the same applies to the galaxy’s most durable metal, and when does she vaporize heavily armored sci-fi organisms?
I can't tell if you missed this but even in your own link, the canonical description of sandstone says "
"Sandstone is a sedimentary rock consisting usually of quartz sand held together by an adhesive agent such as calcium carbonate or silica. Sandstone stands up well to natural erosion, but it can easily be destroyed by focused energy blasts."
With zero mention of it needing to be weakened first. Does she destroy weakened ones in game? Yeah no shit. Does that mean she can't destroy non weakened sandstone? No it doesnt. How hard is this for you to comprehend? And as for the strongest metal in the universe? Same applies, made even worse because we outright do see her destroy it when completely sound without zero integral weakness or characters vastly weaker then her do the same throughout a multitude of games.
When has she done that? Have you ever played a Prime game? Certain beams can literally turn enemies into vapor and ash, including space pirates elites and shit.
Hell or the sheegoths, if hit with a strong enough beam they literally turn charcoal black, ignite and fade into thin air from the heat of the weapon yet that same weapon doesnt blow a hole in a ice wall or low melting point wall, probably because video games don't ******* work like you think they do.
I know how you feel, I couldn’t believe it when I learned that some characters are argued to be mightier than normally seen.
The only thing I can't believe is that I'm actually arguing the most basic commonsense here with you as if it was an actual controversial topic. ******* gameplay segregation exists dude and fyi stop making shit up, you did it in the OP and now you're adding tiny bits of false information into your points as if it isn't blatantly not true to anyone who has the slightest idea of what you're talking about.
